PraisonAI: AgentMail webhook lacks signature verification, allowing unauthenticated message injection and sender spoofingGHSA-qj9c-59p6-8cgx
HIGHGHSA-qj9c-59p6-8cgx is a high-severity (CVSS 7.3) CWE-290 vulnerability in praisonai. A fix is available for praisonai — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-qj9c-59p6-8cgx.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-qj9c-59p6-8cgx by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 394,803 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
praisonaiReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
PraisonAI's AgentMail bot, when run in webhook (or hybrid) mode, starts an aiohttp webhook server bound to 0.0.0.0 and processes inbound message.received events without verifying any signature/HMAC and without authentication. The sender address and message body are taken directly from the attacker-controlled request body, so any network peer can inject messages into the agent with a spoofed sender (bypassing sender allow/block lists) and have the agent process the content and reply to an attacker-chosen address. Sibling bots (linear.py, whatsapp.py) fail closed when no secret is configured; AgentMail omits the check entirely. Runtime-confirmed; severity Medium.
Details
Affected component
- Package:
praisonai4.6.63. File:src/praisonai/praisonai/bots/agentmail.py(AgentMailBot, webhook/hybrid mode).
Vulnerable code / root cause
Path:
src/praisonai/praisonai/bots/agentmail.py
Function:
_start_webhook_mode / _handle_email_webhook / _handle_message
Snippet:
# _start_webhook_mode: binds all interfaces
self._webhook_site = web.TCPSite(self._webhook_runner, "0.0.0.0", self._webhook_port)
# _handle_email_webhook: no signature/HMAC check, no auth
body = await request.json()
if body.get("type") != "message.received":
return web.Response(status=200, text="OK")
asyncio.create_task(self._process_webhook_payload(body)) # dispatch attacker body
return web.Response(status=200, text="OK")
# _handle_message: agent processes content, replies to attacker-controlled sender
response = await self._session.chat(self._agent, sender_id, body, ...)
await self.send_message(channel_id=sender_id, ...)
Issue: attacker-controlled input is the raw webhook JSON (from, extracted_text, subject). The guard that should exist is provider signature verification — there is none here (no svix/HMAC, no webhooks_require_verification() call). The sink is self._session.chat(self._agent, ...) (agent invocation) and send_message(channel_id=sender_id, ...) (reply to the spoofed sender). Sibling handlers src/praisonai/praisonai/bots/linear.py and bots/whatsapp.py call webhooks_require_verification() and reject when no secret is set — AgentMail does not, so it fails open.
Attack flow
- Operator runs the AgentMail bot in webhook/hybrid mode (documented; binds
0.0.0.0, default path/webhook, default port 8080). - Attacker POSTs a crafted
message.receivedevent with a spoofedfromand arbitraryextracted_text. - The agent processes the content; any reply is sent to the attacker-chosen
sender_id.
Why existing protection is bypassed
There is no protection on this handler: no signature verification, no webhooks_require_verification() gate, no auth. Sender allow/block lists are bypassed because from is attacker-controlled.
Security boundary
Unauthenticated network peer → agent message pipeline + reply destination. Crosses the bot's inbound trust boundary (provider webhooks are expected to be signed/authenticated).
Proof of Concept
Environment
Real AgentMailBot._handle_email_webhook mounted in a local runtime (127.0.0.1:18080); the agent layer is a canary recorder (/webhook-log). No real email is sent. Runnable assets: PraisonAI-Runtime-Repro\runtime-files\.
Steps to reproduce
PRAI-03-01-Webhook-Spoofed-Sender:
POST /webhook HTTP/1.1
Host: 127.0.0.1:18080
Content-Type: application/json
{"type":"message.received","data":{"from":"[email protected]","extracted_text":"PRAISONAI_WEBHOOK_INJECT_CANARY_7f3a91 ...","subject":"hello","headers":{}}}
PRAI-03-02-Agent-Reached-Response:GET /webhook-log.
Expected result
The webhook should reject unsigned/unauthenticated events; spoofed senders should not reach the agent.
Actual result
POST /webhook→200 OK(no auth/signature).GET /webhook-log→{"reached_agent":[{"sender":"[email protected]","content":"...PRAISONAI_WEBHOOK_INJECT_CANARY_7f3a91...","source":"webhook"}],"count":1}.
Impact
Unauthenticated message injection into the agent; sender spoofing (access-control bypass); agent reply/exfiltration to an attacker-chosen address; prompt-injection surface; LLM cost abuse. If the agent has dangerous tools, escalation via prompt injection is possible.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | praisonai | all versions | 4.6.78pip install --upgrade 'praisonai==4.6.78' |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for praisonai, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update praisonai to 4.6.78 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-qj9c-59p6-8cgx is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-qj9c-59p6-8cgx in your dependencies?
Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.