GHSA-qgj4-rc8m-44mq is a high-severity (CVSS 8) Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in org.jenkins-ci.main:jenkins-core. A fix is available for org.jenkins-ci.main:jenkins-core — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Stored XSS vulnerability in Jenkins job build time trend
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-qgj4-rc8m-44mq plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 379,145 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
org.jenkins-ci.main:jenkins-core☕org.jenkins-ci.main:jenkins-coreReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Maven packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Jenkins 2.244 and earlier, LTS 2.235.1 and earlier does not escape the agent name in the build time trend page, resulting in a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability.
Jenkins 2.245, LTS 2.235.2 escapes the agent name.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| ☕Maven | org.jenkins-ci.main:jenkins-core | all versions | 2.235.2org.jenkins-ci.main:jenkins-core:2.235.2 |
| ☕Maven | org.jenkins-ci.main:jenkins-core | ≥ 2.236&&< 2.245 | 2.245org.jenkins-ci.main:jenkins-core:2.245 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for org.jenkins-ci.main:jenkins-core, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update org.jenkins-ci.main:jenkins-core to 2.235.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-qgj4-rc8m-44mq is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Escape or sanitise the affected output on the server side rather than relying on client-side filtering, and add a Content-Security-Policy that blocks inline script execution so injected markup cannot run even if it reaches the page.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-qgj4-rc8m-44mq can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to GHSA-qgj4-rc8m-44mq. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
| Product | Fixed in | Advisory |
|---|---|---|
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.11 | jenkins-0:2.235.2.1597220898-1.el7 | RHSA-2020:3541 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.3 | jenkins-0:2.235.5.1600415514-1.el7 | RHSA-2020:3808 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.4 | jenkins-0:2.235.2.1597312065-1.el7 | RHBA-2020:3441 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.4 | openshift-0:4.4.0-202008250319.p0.git.0.d653415.el7 | RHSA-2020:3579 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.5 | jenkins-0:2.235.2.1597312414-1.el7 | RHSA-2020:3519 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-qgj4-rc8m-44mq in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds GHSA-qgj4-rc8m-44mq across Maven dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.