Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹 Go

GHSA-q8m4-xhhv-38mg

etcd: Authorization bypasses in multiple APIs

Also known asBIT-etcd-2026-33413CVE-2026-33413GO-2026-4806
Published
Mar 20, 2026
Updated
Apr 10, 2026
Affected
4 pkgs
Patched
3 / 4
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk16th percentile+0.22%
0.00%0.25%0.50%0.75%0.0%0.1%0.0%0.2%Apr 26Jun 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

4 pkgs affected
🐹go.etcd.io/etcd/v3🐹go.etcd.io/etcd/v3🐹go.etcd.io/etcd/v3🐹go.etcd.io/etcd

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?

Multiple vulnerabilities allow unauthorized users to bypass authentication or authorization checks and call certain etcd functions in clusters that expose the gRPC API to untrusted or partially trusted clients.

In unpatched etcd clusters with etcd auth enabled, unauthorized users are able to:

  • call MemberList and learn cluster topology, including member IDs and advertised endpoints
  • call Alarm, which can be abused for operational disruption or denial of service
  • use Lease APIs, interfering with TTL-based keys and lease ownership
  • trigger compaction, permanently removing historical revisions and disrupting watch, audit, and recovery workflows

Kubernetes does not rely on etcd’s built-in authentication and authorization. Instead, the API server handles authentication and authorization itself, so typical Kubernetes deployments are not affected.

Patches

Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?

These vulnerabilities are patched in the following versions:

  • etcd 3.6.9
  • etcd 3.5.28
  • etcd 3.4.42

Workarounds

Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?

If upgrading is not immediately possible, reduce exposure by treating the affected RPCs as unauthenticated in practice.

  • restrict network access to etcd server ports so only trusted components can connect
  • require strong client identity at the transport layer, such as mTLS with tightly scoped client certificate distribution

Reporters

Community efforts help keep etcd secure

The etcd community thanks Isaac David, bugbunny.ai, Asim Viladi Oglu Manizada, Alex Schapiro & Ahmed Allam from Strix security, Luke Francis, and @OLU-DEVX for reporting these vulnerabilities.

Dependency Between Reported Issues

These issues all originate from the same underlying flaw in the gRPC API layer.

They affect the same API surface and share a common root cause. In practice, the fix is implemented as a single, unified change at the API layer, which resolves all issues together.

Given this, we believe these issues are best treated as a single vulnerability and should be assigned a single CVE.

Affected Packages

4 total 3 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogo.etcd.io/etcd/v33.6.0-alpha.0&&< 3.6.93.6.9
🐹Gogo.etcd.io/etcd/v33.5.0-alpha.0&&< 3.5.283.5.28
🐹Gogo.etcd.io/etcd/v3all versions3.4.42
🐹Gogo.etcd.io/etcdall versionsNo fix

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for go.etcd.io/etcd/v3. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update go.etcd.io/etcd/v3 to 3.6.9 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-q8m4-xhhv-38mg is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-q8m4-xhhv-38mg is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-q8m4-xhhv-38mg. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact _What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?_ Multiple vulnerabilities allow unauthorized users to bypass authentication or authorization checks and call certain etcd functions in clusters that expose the gRPC API to untrusted or partially trusted clients. In unpatched etcd clusters with etcd auth enabled, unauthorized users are able to: - call MemberList and learn cluster topology, including member IDs and advertised endpoints - call Alarm, which can be abused for operational disruption or denial of service - use Lease APIs, interfering with TTL-based keys and lease
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-q8m4-xhhv-38mg in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-q8m4-xhhv-38mg across Go dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.

GHSA-q8m4-xhhv-38mg: etcd: Authorization bypasses in multiple A… | O3 Security