GHSA-q8m4-xhhv-38mg — v3
GHSA-q8m4-xhhv-38mg is a CWE-862 vulnerability in go.etcd.io/etcd/v3. A fix is available for go.etcd.io/etcd/v3 — see the affected versions and patch details below.
etcd: Authorization bypasses in multiple APIs
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-q8m4-xhhv-38mg.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
Real-World Exposure
go.etcd.io/etcd/v3🐹go.etcd.io/etcd/v3🐹go.etcd.io/etcd/v3🐹go.etcd.io/etcdReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Impact
What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?
Multiple vulnerabilities allow unauthorized users to bypass authentication or authorization checks and call certain etcd functions in clusters that expose the gRPC API to untrusted or partially trusted clients.
In unpatched etcd clusters with etcd auth enabled, unauthorized users are able to:
- call MemberList and learn cluster topology, including member IDs and advertised endpoints
- call Alarm, which can be abused for operational disruption or denial of service
- use Lease APIs, interfering with TTL-based keys and lease ownership
- trigger compaction, permanently removing historical revisions and disrupting watch, audit, and recovery workflows
Kubernetes does not rely on etcd’s built-in authentication and authorization. Instead, the API server handles authentication and authorization itself, so typical Kubernetes deployments are not affected.
Patches
Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?
These vulnerabilities are patched in the following versions:
- etcd 3.6.9
- etcd 3.5.28
- etcd 3.4.42
Workarounds
Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?
If upgrading is not immediately possible, reduce exposure by treating the affected RPCs as unauthenticated in practice.
- restrict network access to etcd server ports so only trusted components can connect
- require strong client identity at the transport layer, such as mTLS with tightly scoped client certificate distribution
Reporters
Community efforts help keep etcd secure
The etcd community thanks Isaac David, bugbunny.ai, Asim Viladi Oglu Manizada, Alex Schapiro & Ahmed Allam from Strix security, Luke Francis, and @OLU-DEVX for reporting these vulnerabilities.
Dependency Between Reported Issues
These issues all originate from the same underlying flaw in the gRPC API layer.
They affect the same API surface and share a common root cause. In practice, the fix is implemented as a single, unified change at the API layer, which resolves all issues together.
Given this, we believe these issues are best treated as a single vulnerability and should be assigned a single CVE.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | go.etcd.io/etcd/v3 | ≥ 3.6.0-alpha.0&&< 3.6.9 | 3.6.9go get go.etcd.io/etcd/v3@v3.6.9 |
| 🐹Go | go.etcd.io/etcd/v3 | ≥ 3.5.0-alpha.0&&< 3.5.28 | 3.5.28go get go.etcd.io/etcd/v3@v3.5.28 |
| 🐹Go | go.etcd.io/etcd/v3 | all versions | 3.4.42go get go.etcd.io/etcd/v3@v3.4.42 |
| 🐹Go | go.etcd.io/etcd | all versions | No fix |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for go.etcd.io/etcd/v3, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update go.etcd.io/etcd/v3 to 3.6.9 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-q8m4-xhhv-38mg is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-q8m4-xhhv-38mg can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to GHSA-q8m4-xhhv-38mg. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
This flaw in etcd allows unauthorized users to bypass authentication or authorization checks when the gRPC API is exposed to untrusted clients and etcd's built-in authentication is enabled. This can lead to information disclosure and denial of service. Typical Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform and Kubernetes…
| Product | Fixed in | Advisory |
|---|---|---|
| Red Hat OpenStack Platform 16.2 | etcd-0:3.3.23-22.el8ost | RHSA-2026:54757 |
| Red Hat OpenStack Platform 17.1 for RHEL 9 | etcd-0:3.4.26-9.5.el9ost | RHSA-2026:28047 |
| Multicluster Global Hub 1.4.5 | multicluster-globalhub/multicluster-globalhub-grafana-rhel9:1779579439 | RHSA-2026:22347 |
| Multicluster Global Hub 1.6.5 | multicluster-globalhub/multicluster-globalhub-grafana-rhel9:1780167118 | RHSA-2026:23345 |
| Red Hat multicluster global hub 1.5.3 | multicluster-globalhub/multicluster-globalhub-grafana-rhel9:1778867753 | RHSA-2026:21769 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-q8m4-xhhv-38mg in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds GHSA-q8m4-xhhv-38mg across Go dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.