Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🦀 crates.io

GHSA-q7pg-9pr4-mrp2

MEDIUM

httpsig-rs: HMAC verification is vulnerable to timing attack

Also known asCVE-2025-59058
Published
Sep 12, 2025
Updated
Sep 12, 2025
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk18th percentile+0.21%
0.00%0.25%0.51%0.76%0.0%0.3%Dec 25Apr 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected
🦀httpsig

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects crates.io packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

HMAC signature comparison is not timing-safe and is vulnerable to timing attacks.

Details

SharedKey::sign() returns a Vec<u8> which has a non-constant-time equality implementation.

Hmac::finalize() returns a constant-time wrapper (CtOutput) which was discarded. Alternatively, Hmac has a constant-time verify() method.

The problem reported here is due to the following lines in SharedKey::sign() of the previous code:

let mut mac = HmacSha256::new_from_slice(key).unwrap();
mac.update(data);
Ok(mac.finalize().into_bytes().to_vec())

and the merged update changes the third line to directly verify with verify_slice.

Impact

Anyone who uses HS256 signature verification is vulnerably to Timing Attack that allows the attacker to forge a signature.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🦀crates.iohttpsigall versions0.0.19

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for httpsig. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update httpsig to 0.0.19 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-q7pg-9pr4-mrp2 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-q7pg-9pr4-mrp2 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-q7pg-9pr4-mrp2. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary HMAC signature comparison is not timing-safe and is vulnerable to timing attacks. ### Details `SharedKey::sign()` returns a `Vec<u8>` which has a non-constant-time equality implementation. `Hmac::finalize()` returns a constant-time wrapper ([`CtOutput`](https://docs.rs/digest/0.10.7/digest/struct.CtOutput.html)) which was discarded. Alternatively, `Hmac` has a constant-time `verify()` method. The problem reported here is due to the following lines in `SharedKey::sign()` of the previous code: ```rust let mut mac = HmacSha256::new_from_slice(key).unwrap(); mac.update(data); Ok(mac
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-q7pg-9pr4-mrp2 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-q7pg-9pr4-mrp2 across crates.io dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.