Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
Maven

GHSA-q4q2-93pw-qwgf

HIGH

Issuer validation regression in Spring Cloud SSO Connector

Also known asCVE-2018-1256
Published
May 13, 2022
Updated
Mar 4, 2024
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
1.6%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk72th percentile+1.28%
0.00%0.70%1.39%2.09%0.4%1.6%Dec 25Apr 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected
io.pivotal.spring.cloud:spring-cloud-sso-connector

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Maven packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Spring Cloud SSO Connector, version 2.1.2, contains a regression which disables issuer validation in resource servers that are not bound to the SSO service. In PCF deployments with multiple SSO service plans, a remote attacker can authenticate to unbound resource servers which use this version of the SSO Connector with tokens generated from another service plan.

Mitigation

Users of affected versions should apply the following mitigation:

  • Releases that have fixed this issue include:</p><ul><li>Spring Cloud SSO Connector: 2.1.3</li></ul>
  • Alternatively, you can perform <u>one</u> of the following workarounds:</p><ul><li>Bind your resource server to the SSO service plan via a service instance binding</li><li>Set “sso.connector.cloud.available=true” within your Spring application properties</li></ul>

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
Mavenio.pivotal.spring.cloud:spring-cloud-sso-connector2.1.2.RELEASE&&< 2.1.3.RELEASE2.1.3.RELEASE

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for io.pivotal.spring.cloud:spring-cloud-sso-connector. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update io.pivotal.spring.cloud:spring-cloud-sso-connector to 2.1.3.RELEASE or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-q4q2-93pw-qwgf is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-q4q2-93pw-qwgf is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-q4q2-93pw-qwgf. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

Spring Cloud SSO Connector, version 2.1.2, contains a regression which disables issuer validation in resource servers that are not bound to the SSO service. In PCF deployments with multiple SSO service plans, a remote attacker can authenticate to unbound resource servers which use this version of the SSO Connector with tokens generated from another service plan. ### Mitigation Users of affected versions should apply the following mitigation: * Releases that have fixed this issue include:</p><ul><li>Spring Cloud SSO Connector: 2.1.3</li></ul> * Alternatively, you can perform <u>one</u> of the
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-q4q2-93pw-qwgf in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-q4q2-93pw-qwgf across Maven dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.