GHSA-q2jf-h9jm-m7p4 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) CWE-770 vulnerability in django. EPSS puts its 30-day exploitation probability at 47.4% (99th percentile). A fix is available for django — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Django contains Uncontrolled Resource Consumption via cached header
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-q2jf-h9jm-m7p4.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-q2jf-h9jm-m7p4 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 377,333 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the 10–50% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
django🐍django🐍djangoReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
In Django 3.2 before 3.2.17, 4.0 before 4.0.9, and 4.1 before 4.1.6, the parsed values of Accept-Language headers are cached in order to avoid repetitive parsing. This leads to a potential denial-of-service vector via excessive memory usage if the raw value of Accept-Language headers is very large.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | django | ≥ 3.2a1&&< 3.2.17 | 3.2.17pip install --upgrade 'django==3.2.17' |
| 🐍PyPI | django | ≥ 4.0a1&&< 4.0.9 | 4.0.9pip install --upgrade 'django==4.0.9' |
| 🐍PyPI | django | ≥ 4.1a1&&< 4.1.6 | 4.1.6pip install --upgrade 'django==4.1.6' |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for django, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update django to 3.2.17 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-q2jf-h9jm-m7p4 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-q2jf-h9jm-m7p4 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to GHSA-q2jf-h9jm-m7p4. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
| Product | Fixed in | Advisory |
|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Satellite 6.13 for RHEL 8 | python-django-0:3.2.18-1.el8pc | RHSA-2023:2097 |
| RHUI 4 for RHEL 8 | python-django-0:3.2.18-1.0.1.el8ui | RHSA-2023:2101 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-q2jf-h9jm-m7p4 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds GHSA-q2jf-h9jm-m7p4 across PyPI dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.