GHSA-prq8-7wvh-44qh is a high-severity (CVSS 7.2) Information Exposure vulnerability in oauth. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-prq8-7wvh-44qh is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.
OAuth: Cross-origin token-request redirects can expose signed request metadata
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-prq8-7wvh-44qh.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-prq8-7wvh-44qh plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 0 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
oauthReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects RubyGems packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Cross-origin OAuth token-request redirects can expose signed request metadata
Summary
When an application uses OAuth::Consumer to request OAuth 1.0 request tokens or
access tokens, the token request helper follows 300..399 redirects returned by
the OAuth server. In affected versions, OAuth::Consumer#token_request parses the
raw Location header, follows the redirect recursively, and can mutate the
consumer's configured site when the redirect points to a different host with
the same path.
The result is a cross-origin signed-request disclosure primitive: if an OAuth server token endpoint returns a redirect whose target an attacker controls, the client can re-sign the token request and send OAuth 1.0 request metadata, including the OAuth signature, nonce, timestamp, consumer key, and any request parameters included in the signature base string, to the attacker-controlled host. The same behavior can also be used as an SSRF or confused-deputy primitive because the application server follows the redirect and sends the next request from its own network position.
Affected
oauthv1.1.5 and prior versions back to and including v0.5.5.- The cross-host token redirect behavior was introduced by https://github.com/ruby-oauth/oauth/commit/d74b767f
- The behavior is documented in the v0.5.5 changelog as "Allow redirect to different host but same path".
- The vulnerable behavior is in
OAuth::Consumer#token_request, which is used by the documented request-token and access-token flows. - The issue is not specific to a Ruby engine or platform. It is caused by the gem's redirect handling and recursive token request behavior.
Patched version: oauth v1.1.6.
Impact
A consumer that calls OAuth::Consumer#get_request_token,
OAuth::Consumer#get_access_token, or lower-level token request helpers against
an OAuth server whose token endpoint redirect target can be influenced may lose
three security properties:
- Cross-origin signed-request metadata disclosure. The redirected request is
signed for the attacker-controlled endpoint. Depending on the request method,
scheme, and parameters, the attacker may receive OAuth 1.0 parameters such as
oauth_consumer_key,oauth_signature_method,oauth_timestamp,oauth_nonce,oauth_version, andoauth_signature. - SSRF from the application server. The OAuth client follows the redirect on behalf of the application, so the redirected host is contacted from the application server's network position.
- Confused-deputy behavior. A malicious or compromised token endpoint can cause an otherwise trusted application to initiate signed requests to an unintended origin.
The disclosed OAuth 1 signature is not equivalent to an OAuth 2 bearer token: it is bound to the signed request, timestamp, nonce, HTTP method, and request URL. However, it can still disclose sensitive integration metadata, may be replayable within the receiver's accepted nonce/timestamp window in some deployments, and can expose application-server reachability to attacker-selected hosts.
Vulnerable code
lib/oauth/consumer.rb
at tag v1.1.5:
def token_request(http_method, path, token = nil, request_options = {}, *arguments)
request_options[:token_request] ||= true
response = request(http_method, path, token, request_options, *arguments)
case response.code.to_i
when (200..299)
# parse token response
when (300..399)
# Parse redirect to follow
uri = URI.parse(response["location"])
our_uri = URI.parse(site)
# Guard against infinite redirects
response.error! if uri.path == path && our_uri.host == uri.host
if uri.path == path && our_uri.host != uri.host
options[:site] = "#{uri.scheme}://#{uri.host}"
@http = create_http
end
token_request(http_method, uri.path, token, request_options, arguments)
when (400..499)
raise OAuth::Unauthorized, response
else
response.error!
end
end
The vulnerable behavior has several parts:
response["location"]is trusted as the next token request target.- Redirects are followed for every
300..399response. - There is no general redirect counter or maximum redirect limit.
- Cross-host redirects with the same path can mutate
options[:site]and rebuild the underlying HTTP client. - The recursive call continues the token request flow and signs the next request for the redirected destination.
Reachable in production
The vulnerable path is reachable through the normal OAuth 1 token exchange:
consumer = OAuth::Consumer.new(
consumer_key,
consumer_secret,
site: "https://provider.example"
)
request_token = consumer.get_request_token
If https://provider.example/oauth/request_token returns a redirect to an
attacker-controlled host, the library follows that redirect as part of the token
request flow. A realistic trigger is an OAuth provider, gateway, or reverse proxy
that emits Location based on user-controlled or tenant-controlled input, or a
malicious tenant-controlled OAuth endpoint in a multi-tenant integration.
No application-level redirect handling is required. The redirect is followed inside the gem before the application receives the token response.
Reproduction
A vulnerable application is one that uses OAuth::Consumer to perform an OAuth
1 token exchange against a token endpoint that can be made to return a redirect
to another origin.
Example shape:
consumer = OAuth::Consumer.new(
consumer_key,
consumer_secret,
site: "https://provider.example"
)
consumer.get_request_token
If https://provider.example/oauth/request_token responds with a 30x redirect
whose Location points to https://attacker.example/..., affected versions may
follow that redirect as part of the token request flow. The redirected request is
then generated and signed by the application server for the new destination.
Depending on the configured OAuth request scheme, OAuth 1 parameters may be sent
in the Authorization header, request body, or query string.
Expected vulnerable behavior:
- the token request leaves the configured OAuth provider origin;
- the redirected host receives a signed OAuth 1 token request;
- the application does not get a chance to inspect or approve the redirect target before the redirected request is sent.
Expected patched behavior:
- same-origin redirects continue to work, subject to a redirect limit;
- cross-origin token endpoint redirects are rejected by default;
- applications that intentionally require cross-origin token redirects must opt
in explicitly with
token_request_cross_origin_redirects.
Suggested fix
Reject cross-origin token endpoint redirects by default and require explicit opt-in for integrations that intentionally depend on that behavior.
The fix released in v1.1.6 does the following:
current_uri = token_request_uri(path)
redirected_uri = token_request_redirect_uri(current_uri, response)
response.error! unless redirected_uri
redirect_count = request_options[:token_request_redirect_count].to_i + 1
response.error! if redirect_count > token_request_max_redirects(request_options)
response.error! if token_request_cross_origin?(current_uri, redirected_uri) &&
!token_request_cross_origin_redirects?(request_options)
redirect_options = request_options.merge(token_request_redirect_count: redirect_count)
token_request(http_method, token_request_redirect_path(current_uri, redirected_uri), token, redirect_options, *arguments, &block)
The fix intentionally preserves same-origin redirect compatibility while making
cross-origin token endpoint redirects an explicit choice. It also avoids placing
internal redirect state in request_options passed to OAuth signing.
Workarounds
Until a patched release is available, applications can reduce exposure by doing one or more of the following:
- Ensure configured OAuth token endpoints are fixed absolute URLs controlled by a trusted provider.
- Do not use tenant-controlled OAuth token endpoint URLs unless the tenant is trusted to receive signed OAuth token requests.
- Block outbound application-server traffic to internal metadata services and other sensitive internal addresses at the network layer.
- Place a trusted proxy in front of OAuth providers that rejects token endpoint redirects to a different origin.
These mitigations reduce exploitability but do not remove the vulnerable redirect logic from the gem.
Credit
Found during the follow-up audit for GHSA-pp92-crg2-gfv9.
Reporter/coordinator: Peter H. Boling (pboling).
References
- Related OAuth 2 advisory: https://github.com/ruby-oauth/oauth2/security/advisories/GHSA-pp92-crg2-gfv9
- Fixed version:
oauthv1.1.6 - Behavior-introducing commit: https://github.com/ruby-oauth/oauth/commit/d74b767f
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💎RubyGems | oauth | ≥ 0.5.5&&< 1.1.6 | 1.1.6 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for oauth. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update oauth to 1.1.6 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-prq8-7wvh-44qh is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-prq8-7wvh-44qh is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-prq8-7wvh-44qh. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-prq8-7wvh-44qh in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-prq8-7wvh-44qh across RubyGems dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.