How severe is GHSA-pj95-ph4q-4qm4?

GHSA-pj95-ph4q-4qm4 has a CVSS score of 4.3/10, rated MEDIUM. Review your exposure and patch according to your risk tolerance.

Which packages are affected by GHSA-pj95-ph4q-4qm4?

GHSA-pj95-ph4q-4qm4 affects the following packages: org.jenkins-ci.main:jenkins-core (Maven), org.jenkins-ci.main:jenkins-core (Maven). Ecosystems affected: Maven.

How do I fix GHSA-pj95-ph4q-4qm4?

Update org.jenkins-ci.main:jenkins-core to 2.462.3 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-pj95-ph4q-4qm4 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

How do I detect GHSA-pj95-ph4q-4qm4 in my Maven dependencies?

Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for org.jenkins-ci.main:jenkins-core. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

How do I mitigate GHSA-pj95-ph4q-4qm4 if there is no patch (or I can't update yet)?

If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

How does O3 Security protect against GHSA-pj95-ph4q-4qm4?

O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-pj95-ph4q-4qm4 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Is GHSA-pj95-ph4q-4qm4 actively exploited in the wild?

No public exploit code has been indexed for GHSA-pj95-ph4q-4qm4 yet. This does not mean the vulnerability cannot be exploited — absence of public exploits does not imply safety. Apply the recommended fix and use O3 Security to monitor your exposure.

What is the EPSS score for GHSA-pj95-ph4q-4qm4?

GHSA-pj95-ph4q-4qm4 has an EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) score of 0.8%, placing it in the 53th percentile of all CVEs. EPSS is maintained by FIRST.org and estimates the probability that a vulnerability will be exploited in the wild within the next 30 days. This score indicates relatively lower exploitation probability, though the CVSS severity should still guide your patching priority.

When was GHSA-pj95-ph4q-4qm4 published, and has it been updated?

GHSA-pj95-ph4q-4qm4 was published on October 2, 2024 and was last updated on February 4, 2026. Advisory data evolves as severity scores, affected ranges, and exploit intelligence are revised — always check the latest version of the advisory before acting.

☕ Maven

GHSA-pj95-ph4q-4qm4

MEDIUM

Jenkins exposes multi-line secrets through error messages

Also known asBIT-jenkins-2024-47803CVE-2024-47803

Published

Oct 2, 2024

Updated

Feb 4, 2026

Affected

2 pkgs

Patched

2 / 2

Exploits

None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗

0.8%probability of exploitation in next 30 days

Lower Risk53th percentile+0.21%

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

2 pkgs affected

☕org.jenkins-ci.main:jenkins-core☕org.jenkins-ci.main:jenkins-core

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Maven packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Jenkins

Jenkins provides the secretTextarea form field for multi-line secrets.

Jenkins 2.478 and earlier, LTS 2.462.2 and earlier does not redact multi-line secret values in error messages generated for form submissions involving the secretTextarea form field.

This can result in exposure of multi-line secrets through those error messages, e.g., in the system log.

Jenkins 2.479, LTS 2.462.3 redacts multi-line secret values in error messages generated for form submissions involving the secretTextarea form field.

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed

Ecosystem	Package	Vulnerable range	Fix
☕Maven	`org.jenkins-ci.main:jenkins-core`	all versions	2.462.3
☕Maven	`org.jenkins-ci.main:jenkins-core`	≥ 2.466&&< 2.479	2.479

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency

Detect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for org.jenkins-ci.main:jenkins-core. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update org.jenkins-ci.main:jenkins-core to 2.462.3 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-pj95-ph4q-4qm4 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-pj95-ph4q-4qm4 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-pj95-ph4q-4qm4. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

Jenkins Jenkins provides the `secretTextarea` form field for multi-line secrets. Jenkins 2.478 and earlier, LTS 2.462.2 and earlier does not redact multi-line secret values in error messages generated for form submissions involving the `secretTextarea` form field. This can result in exposure of multi-line secrets through those error messages, e.g., in the system log. Jenkins 2.479, LTS 2.462.3 redacts multi-line secret values in error messages generated for form submissions involving the `secretTextarea` form field.

O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-pj95-ph4q-4qm4 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-pj95-ph4q-4qm4 across Maven dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.

Scan my dependencies How O3 SCA works