Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦
📦 npm
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

GHSA-pchc-86f6-8758 openclaw

HIGHFix: openclaw/openclaw@743f4b2

GHSA-pchc-86f6-8758 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) CWE-863 vulnerability in openclaw. A fix is available for openclaw — see the affected versions and patch details below.

OpenClaw BlueBubbles webhook auth bypass via loopback proxy trust

Also known asCVE-2026-26316
Published
Feb 17, 2026
Updated
Feb 20, 2026
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
2 / 2
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 21, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-pchc-86f6-8758.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs26th percentile — riskier than 26% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-pchc-86f6-8758 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 377,636 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

2 pkgs affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

133other npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream
openclawnpm
2.7Mdownloads / week
@openclaw/bluebubblesnpm
565downloads / week

Description

Summary

In affected versions, the optional BlueBubbles iMessage channel plugin could accept webhook requests as authenticated based only on the TCP peer address being loopback (127.0.0.1, ::1, ::ffff:127.0.0.1) even when the configured webhook secret was missing or incorrect. This does not affect the default iMessage integration unless BlueBubbles is installed and enabled.

Affected Packages / Versions

  • npm: openclaw < 2026.2.13
  • npm: @openclaw/bluebubbles < 2026.2.13

Details

If a deployment exposes the BlueBubbles webhook endpoint through a same-host reverse proxy (or an attacker can reach loopback via SSRF), an unauthenticated party may be able to inject inbound webhook events into the agent pipeline.

Fix Commit(s)

  • f836c385ffc746cb954e8ee409f99d079bfdcd2f
  • 743f4b28495cdeb0d5bf76f6ebf4af01f6a02e5a (defense-in-depth)

Mitigations

  • Set a non-empty BlueBubbles webhook password.
  • Avoid deployments where a public-facing reverse proxy forwards to a loopback-bound Gateway without strong upstream authentication.

Thanks @MegaManSec (https://joshua.hu) of AISLE Research Team for reporting.

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npmopenclawall versions2026.2.13npm install openclaw@2026.2.13
📦npm@openclaw/bluebubblesall versions2026.2.13npm install @openclaw/bluebubbles@2026.2.13

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for openclaw, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update openclaw to 2026.2.13 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-pchc-86f6-8758 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-pchc-86f6-8758 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-pchc-86f6-8758. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary In affected versions, the optional BlueBubbles iMessage channel plugin could accept webhook requests as authenticated based only on the TCP peer address being loopback (`127.0.0.1`, `::1`, `::ffff:127.0.0.1`) even when the configured webhook secret was missing or incorrect. This does not affect the default iMessage integration unless BlueBubbles is installed and enabled. ### Affected Packages / Versions - npm: `openclaw` `< 2026.2.13` - npm: `@openclaw/bluebubbles` `< 2026.2.13` ### Details If a deployment exposes the BlueBubbles webhook endpoint through a same-host reverse pr
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-pchc-86f6-8758 in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-pchc-86f6-8758 across npm dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-pchc-86f6-8758: openclaw (High 7.5) | O3 Security