How severe is GHSA-p9x3-w98f-7j3q?

No CVSS score has been assigned to GHSA-p9x3-w98f-7j3q yet. Review the advisory details and affected package list to assess your exposure.

Which packages are affected by GHSA-p9x3-w98f-7j3q?

GHSA-p9x3-w98f-7j3q affects the following packages: nocodb (npm). Ecosystems affected: npm.

How do I fix GHSA-p9x3-w98f-7j3q?

Update nocodb to 0.301.3 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-p9x3-w98f-7j3q is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

How do I detect GHSA-p9x3-w98f-7j3q in my npm dependencies?

Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for nocodb, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

How do I mitigate GHSA-p9x3-w98f-7j3q if there is no patch (or I can't update yet)?

Cap what an attacker can consume: apply request size, rate and timeout limits in front of the affected component, and run it with memory and CPU limits so exhaustion degrades one worker rather than the whole service.

Is GHSA-p9x3-w98f-7j3q actively exploited in the wild?

No public exploit code has been indexed for GHSA-p9x3-w98f-7j3q yet. This does not mean the vulnerability cannot be exploited — absence of public exploits does not imply safety. Apply the recommended fix and use O3 Security to monitor your exposure.

What is the EPSS score for GHSA-p9x3-w98f-7j3q?

GHSA-p9x3-w98f-7j3q has an EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) score of 0.2%, placing it in the 8th percentile of all CVEs. EPSS is maintained by FIRST.org and estimates the probability that a vulnerability will be exploited in the wild within the next 30 days. This score indicates relatively lower exploitation probability, though the CVSS severity should still guide your patching priority.

What type of vulnerability is GHSA-p9x3-w98f-7j3q?

GHSA-p9x3-w98f-7j3q is classified as CWE-639 (CWE-639). This weakness type describe the underlying flaw category, which helps determine the potential impact and the right class of mitigation.

When was GHSA-p9x3-w98f-7j3q published, and has it been updated?

GHSA-p9x3-w98f-7j3q was published on March 2, 2026 and was last updated on March 4, 2026. Advisory data evolves as severity scores, affected ranges, and exploit intelligence are revised — always check the latest version of the advisory before acting.

📦 npm

Not in CISA KEV

NocoDB Missing Ownership Validation in MCP Token OperationsGHSA-p9x3-w98f-7j3q

GHSA-p9x3-w98f-7j3q is a CWE-639 vulnerability in nocodb. A fix is available for nocodb — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Also known asCVE-2026-28361

Published

Mar 2, 2026

Updated

Mar 4, 2026

Affected

1 pkg

Patched

1 / 1

Exploits

None indexed

Exploitation data as of Nov 8, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-p9x3-w98f-7j3q.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗

0.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days

Lower Risk0.00%

Lower risk than most CVEs8th percentile — riskier than 8% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

0other npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream

nocodbnpm

14Kdownloads / week

Description

Summary

The MCP token service did not validate token ownership, allowing a Creator within the same base to read, regenerate, or delete another user's MCP tokens if the token ID was known.

Details

McpTokenService.get(), regenerateToken(), and delete() did not filter by fk_user_id. The analogous ApiTokensService correctly enforced ownership.

Impact

Limited — requires Creator role and knowledge of target token ID. Primary risk is denial of service (invalidating tokens) and scoped token disclosure.

Credit

This issue was reported by @bugbunny-research (bugbunny.ai).

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed

Ecosystem	Package	Vulnerable range	Fix
📦npm	`nocodb`	all versions	0.301.3`npm install nocodb@0.301.3`

Affected Products

1 product · 1 configurations

Application

nocodbnocodb

< 0.301.3

range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency

Detect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for nocodb, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update nocodb to 0.301.3 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-p9x3-w98f-7j3q is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Cap what an attacker can consume: apply request size, rate and timeout limits in front of the affected component, and run it with memory and CPU limits so exhaustion degrades one worker rather than the whole service.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary The MCP token service did not validate token ownership, allowing a Creator within the same base to read, regenerate, or delete another user's MCP tokens if the token ID was known. ### Details `McpTokenService.get()`, `regenerateToken()`, and `delete()` did not filter by `fk_user_id`. The analogous `ApiTokensService` correctly enforced ownership. ### Impact Limited — requires Creator role and knowledge of target token ID. Primary risk is denial of service (invalidating tokens) and scoped token disclosure. ### Credit This issue was reported by [@bugbunny-research](https://github.c

O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-p9x3-w98f-7j3q in your dependencies?

Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.

Scan my dependencies How O3 SCA works