Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐘 Packagist

GHSA-p8gp-899c-jvq9

MEDIUM

Wallabag user can reset data unintentionally

Also known asCVE-2023-4454
Published
Aug 21, 2023
Updated
Feb 16, 2024
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
1 known

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk14th percentile+0.09%
0.00%0.24%0.49%0.73%0.2%0.2%Dec 25Apr 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected
🐘wallabag/wallabag

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Description

wallabag was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) which allows attackers to arbitrarily reset annotations, entries and tags, by the GET request to /reset/annotations, /reset/entries, /reset/tags, /reset/archived.

This vulnerability has a CVSSv3.1 score of 4.3.

You should immediately patch your instance to version 2.6.3 or higher if you have more than one user and/or having open registration.

Resolution

These actions are now doable only via POST method, which ensures that we can't do them via a 3rd-party website.

Credits

We would like to thank @zpbrent for reporting this issue through huntr.dev.

Reference: https://huntr.dev/bounties/4ee0ef74-e4d4-46e7-a05c-076bce522299/

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐘Packagistwallabag/wallabag2.0.0-alpha.1&&< 2.6.32.6.3
Exploits & PoCs
1

Research use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for wallabag/wallabag. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update wallabag/wallabag to 2.6.3 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-p8gp-899c-jvq9 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-p8gp-899c-jvq9 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-p8gp-899c-jvq9. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

# Description wallabag was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) which allows attackers to arbitrarily reset annotations, entries and tags, by the GET request to `/reset/annotations`, `/reset/entries`, `/reset/tags`, `/reset/archived`. This vulnerability has a CVSSv3.1 score of 4.3. **You should immediately patch your instance to version 2.6.3 or higher if you have more than one user and/or having open registration**. # Resolution These actions are now doable only via POST method, which ensures that we can't do them via a 3rd-party website. # Credits We would like
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-p8gp-899c-jvq9 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-p8gp-899c-jvq9 across Packagist dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.