NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹 Go
Not in CISA KEV

Canonical LXD Project Existence Determination Through Error Handling in Image Export FunctionGHSA-p3x5-mvmp-5f35

GHSA-p3x5-mvmp-5f35 is a Information Exposure vulnerability in github.com/canonical/lxd. A fix is available for github.com/canonical/lxd — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Also known asCVE-2025-54290GO-2025-4002
Published
Updated
Affected
3 pkgs
Patched
3 / 3
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Nov 6, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-p3x5-mvmp-5f35.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs27th percentile — riskier than 27% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.28%0.56%0.84%0.1%0.3%May 26Sep 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

Real-World Exposure

3 pkgs affected
🐹github.com/canonical/lxd🐹github.com/canonical/lxd🐹github.com/canonical/lxd

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

In LXD's images export API (/1.0/images/{fingerprint}/export), implementation differences in error handling allow determining project existence without authentication.

Specifically, in the following code, errors when multiple images match are directly returned to users as API responses:

https://github.com/canonical/lxd/blob/43d5189564d27f6161b430ed258c8b56603c2759/lxd/db/images.go#L239-L246

While fingerprints generally don't duplicate, this functionality uses fingerprints with LIKE clauses, allowing prefix specification. Therefore, using LIKE wildcards such as % will match multiple images if multiple images exist in the project.

https://github.com/canonical/lxd/blob/43d5189564d27f6161b430ed258c8b56603c2759/lxd/db/images.go#L277-L286

In the above implementation, multiple matches result in a 500 error, but if the project itself doesn't exist, there are 0 matches and a 404 is returned.

  1. When project exists and multiple images match: HTTP 500 error "More than one image matches"
  2. When project doesn't exist: HTTP 404 error "not found"

This behavioural difference allows attackers to confirm project existence without authentication.

Reproduction Steps

  1. Send a request with a pattern matching multiple entries to an existing project (default):
curl -k 'https://lxd-host:8443/1.0/images/%25/export?project=default&secret=x'

Response:

{"type":"error","status":"","status_code":0,"operation":"","error_code":500,"error":"More than one image matches","metadata":null}
  1. Send a same request to a non-existent project (not-exist):
curl -k 'https://lxd-host:8443/1.0/images/%25/export?project=not-exist&secret=x'

Response:

{"type":"error","status":"","status_code":0,"operation":"","error_code":404,"error":"not found","metadata":null}

This difference allows enumerating existing projects in the system by brute-forcing(dictionary attack) project names.

Note that %25 is the URL encoding of %, which works as a wildcard matching all characters in SQL LIKE clauses. This is used to intentionally create requests matching multiple images to trigger a 500 error.

Additionally, the secret parameter is added to include non-public images in the search, increasing the possibility of multiple matches.

https://github.com/canonical/lxd/blob/43d5189564d27f6161b430ed258c8b56603c2759/lxd/images.go#L4211-L4230

Risk

The attack requires only network access to the LXD API endpoint, with no authentication needed.

The attack allows confirming the existence of projects within the LXD system by exploiting differences in HTTP status codes. This could potentially increase the exploitability of other vulnerabilities. Additionally, since project IDs often use meaningful names set by users, this could lead to leakage of unpublished product information.

However, resource information within projects cannot be obtained, limiting the impact to existence confirmation only.

Countermeasures

It is recommended to modify error handling in the images export API (/1.0/images/{fingerprint}/export) to return consistent responses regardless of project existence.

Specifically, return 404 even when errors occur during project existence verification. This ensures the same error response is returned for both existing and non-existing projects, preventing determination of project existence.

Additionally, if there are no specification(compatibility) issues, allowing only exact fingerprint matches in unauthenticated states and disabling prefix matching can prevent unexpected errors from occurring.

Patches

LXD SeriesStatus
6Fixed in LXD 6.5
5.21Fixed in LXD 5.21.4
5.0Ignored - Not critical
4.0Ignored - EOL and not critical

References

Reported by GMO Flatt Security Inc.

Affected Packages

3 total 3 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/canonical/lxd≥ 4.0&&< 5.21.45.21.4go get github.com/canonical/lxd@v5.21.4
🐹Gogithub.com/canonical/lxd≥ 6.0&&< 6.56.5go get github.com/canonical/lxd@v6.5
🐹Gogithub.com/canonical/lxd≥ 0.0.0-20200331193331-03aab09f5b5c&&< 0.0.0-20250827065555-0494f5d47e410.0.0-20250827065555-0494f5d47e41go get github.com/canonical/lxd@v0.0.0-20250827065555-0494f5d47e41

Affected Products

1 product · 2 configurations
Application
lxdcanonical
≥ 6.1 && < 6.5
range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/canonical/lxd, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update github.com/canonical/lxd to 5.21.4 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-p3x5-mvmp-5f35 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Assume what was exposed is already known: rotate any credential, token or key that the affected component could return, restrict the endpoint to callers that genuinely need it, and strip sensitive fields from responses and error output at the boundary rather than relying on the client not to read them.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact In LXD's images export API (`/1.0/images/{fingerprint}/export`), implementation differences in error handling allow determining project existence without authentication. Specifically, in the following code, errors when multiple images match are directly returned to users as API responses: https://github.com/canonical/lxd/blob/43d5189564d27f6161b430ed258c8b56603c2759/lxd/db/images.go#L239-L246 While fingerprints generally don't duplicate, this functionality uses fingerprints with LIKE clauses, allowing prefix specification. Therefore, using LIKE wildcards such as % will match mult
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-p3x5-mvmp-5f35 in your dependencies?

Find it across Go, including transitive dependencies.

Canonical LXD Project Existence Determination Through…