Ascii (crate) allows out-of-bounds array indexing in safe codeGHSA-mrrw-grhq-86gf
Fix: tomprogrammer/rust-ascii#63GHSA-mrrw-grhq-86gf is a security vulnerability in ascii. A fix is available for ascii — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Real-World Exposure
asciiReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects crates.io packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Affected version of this crate had implementation of From<&mut AsciiStr> for &mut [u8] and &mut str. This can result in out-of-bounds array indexing in safe code.
The flaw was corrected in commit 8a6c779 by removing those impls.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🦀crates.io | ascii | ≥ 0.7.0&&< 0.9.3 | 0.9.3cargo update -p ascii --precise 0.9.3 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for ascii, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update ascii to 0.9.3 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-mrrw-grhq-86gf is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Constrain what reaches the vulnerable code: limit the size and shape of untrusted input, isolate the affected component in a sandboxed or least-privileged process, and enable the platform's memory-safety mitigations (ASLR, stack protector, hardened allocator) so an out-of-bounds access is more likely to fail closed than to be exploitable.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-mrrw-grhq-86gf in your dependencies?
Find it across crates.io, including transitive dependencies.