GHSA-mj7r-x3h3-7rmr
LOWGHSA-mj7r-x3h3-7rmr is a low-severity (CVSS 3.7) CWE-208 vulnerability in apostrophe. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-mj7r-x3h3-7rmr is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.
ApostropheCMS: User Enumeration via Timing Side Channel in Password Reset Endpoint
Blast Radius
Weekly download volume for affected packages — a proxy for how broadly this vulnerability is deployed.
apostrophenpmDescription
Summary
The password reset endpoint (/api/v1/@apostrophecms/login/reset-request) exhibits a measurable timing side channel that allows unauthenticated attackers to enumerate valid usernames and email addresses. When a user is not found, the handler returns after a fixed 2-second artificial delay, but when a valid user is found, it performs database writes and SMTP operations with no equivalent delay normalization, producing a distinguishable timing profile.
Details
The resetRequest handler in modules/@apostrophecms/login/index.js attempts to obscure the user-not-found path with an artificial delay, but fails to normalize the timing of the user-found path:
User not found — fixed 2000ms delay (index.js:309-314):
if (!user) {
await wait(); // wait = (t = 2000) => Promise.delay(t)
self.apos.util.error(
`Reset password request error - the user ${email} doesn\`t exist.`
);
return;
}
User found — variable-duration DB + SMTP operations, no artificial delay (index.js:323-355):
const reset = self.apos.util.generateId();
user.passwordReset = reset;
user.passwordResetAt = new Date();
await self.apos.user.update(req, user, { permissions: false });
// ... URL construction ...
await self.email(req, 'passwordResetEmail', {
user,
url: parsed.toString(),
site
}, {
to: user.email,
subject: req.t('apostrophe:passwordResetRequest', { site })
});
The user-found path includes a MongoDB update() call and an SMTP email() send, which together produce response times that differ measurably from the fixed 2000ms delay. Depending on SMTP server latency, responses for valid users will either be noticeably faster (local/fast SMTP) or slower (remote SMTP) than the constant 2-second delay for invalid users.
Additionally, the getPasswordResetUser method (index.js:664-666) accepts both username and email via an $or query, enabling enumeration of both identifiers:
const criteriaOr = [
{ username: email },
{ email }
];
There is no rate limiting on the reset endpoint. The checkLoginAttempts throttle (index.js:978) is only applied to the login flow, allowing unlimited rapid probing of the reset endpoint.
PoC
Prerequisites: An Apostrophe instance with passwordReset: true enabled in @apostrophecms/login configuration.
Step 1 — Baseline invalid user timing:
for i in $(seq 1 10); do
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{time_total}\n" \
-X POST http://localhost:3000/api/v1/@apostrophecms/login/reset-request \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"email": "nonexistent-user-'$i'@example.com"}'
done
# Expected: all responses cluster tightly around 2.0xx seconds
Step 2 — Test known valid user:
for i in $(seq 1 10); do
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{time_total}\n" \
-X POST http://localhost:3000/api/v1/@apostrophecms/login/reset-request \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"email": "admin"}'
done
# Expected: response times differ from 2.0s baseline (faster with local SMTP, slower with remote SMTP)
Step 3 — Statistical comparison: The two distributions will show a measurable divergence. With a local mail server, valid-user responses typically complete in <500ms. With a remote SMTP server, valid-user responses may take 3-5+ seconds. Either way, the timing is distinguishable from the fixed 2000ms invalid-user delay.
Impact
- Account enumeration: An unauthenticated attacker can determine whether a given username or email address has an account in the Apostrophe instance.
- Credential stuffing preparation: Confirmed valid accounts can be targeted with credential stuffing attacks using breached password databases.
- Phishing targeting: Knowledge of valid accounts enables targeted phishing campaigns against confirmed users.
- No rate limiting: The absence of throttling on the reset endpoint allows high-speed automated enumeration.
- Mitigating factor: The
passwordResetoption defaults tofalse(index.js:62), so only instances that explicitly enable password reset are affected.
Recommended Fix
Normalize all code paths to a constant minimum duration, ensuring the response time does not leak whether a user was found:
async resetRequest(req) {
const MIN_RESPONSE_TIME = 2000;
const startTime = Date.now();
const site = (req.headers.host || '').replace(/:\d+$/, '');
const email = self.apos.launder.string(req.body.email);
if (!email.length) {
throw self.apos.error('invalid', req.t('apostrophe:loginResetEmailRequired'));
}
let user;
try {
user = await self.getPasswordResetUser(req.body.email);
} catch (e) {
self.apos.util.error(e);
}
if (!user) {
self.apos.util.error(
`Reset password request error - the user ${email} doesn\`t exist.`
);
} else if (!user.email) {
self.apos.util.error(
`Reset password request error - the user ${user.username} doesn\`t have an email.`
);
} else {
const reset = self.apos.util.generateId();
user.passwordReset = reset;
user.passwordResetAt = new Date();
await self.apos.user.update(req, user, { permissions: false });
let port = (req.headers.host || '').split(':')[1];
if (!port || [ '80', '443' ].includes(port)) {
port = '';
} else {
port = `:${port}`;
}
const parsed = new URL(
req.absoluteUrl,
self.apos.baseUrl
? undefined
: `${req.protocol}://${req.hostname}${port}`
);
parsed.pathname = self.login();
parsed.search = '?';
parsed.searchParams.append('reset', reset);
parsed.searchParams.append('email', user.email);
try {
await self.email(req, 'passwordResetEmail', {
user,
url: parsed.toString(),
site
}, {
to: user.email,
subject: req.t('apostrophe:passwordResetRequest', { site })
});
} catch (err) {
self.apos.util.error(`Error while sending email to ${user.email}`, err);
}
}
// Pad all paths to a constant minimum duration
const elapsed = Date.now() - startTime;
if (elapsed < MIN_RESPONSE_TIME) {
await Promise.delay(MIN_RESPONSE_TIME - elapsed);
}
},
Additionally, consider applying rate limiting to the reset-request endpoint to prevent high-speed enumeration attempts.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | apostrophe | all versions | 4.29.0 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for apostrophe. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update apostrophe to 4.29.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-mj7r-x3h3-7rmr is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-mj7r-x3h3-7rmr is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-mj7r-x3h3-7rmr. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-mj7r-x3h3-7rmr in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-mj7r-x3h3-7rmr across npm dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.