LangGraph: BaseCache Deserialization of Untrusted Data may lead to Remote Code ExecutionGHSA-mhr3-j7m5-c7c9
MEDIUMFix: langchain-ai/langgraph#6677GHSA-mhr3-j7m5-c7c9 is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.6) Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in langgraph-checkpoint. A fix is available for langgraph-checkpoint — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-mhr3-j7m5-c7c9.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
Where this sits among everything scored
Real-World Exposure
langgraph-checkpointReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Context
A Remote Code Execution vulnerability exists in LangGraph's caching layer when applications enable cache backends that inherit from BaseCache and opt nodes into caching via CachePolicy. Prior to langgraph-checkpoint 4.0.0, BaseCache defaults to JsonPlusSerializer(pickle_fallback=True). When msgpack serialization fails, cached values can be deserialized via pickle.loads(...).
Who is affected?
Caching is not enabled by default. Applications are affected only when:
- The application explicitly enables a cache backend (for example by passing
cache=...toStateGraph.compile(...)or otherwise configuring aBaseCacheimplementation) - One or more nodes opt into caching via
CachePolicy - The attacker can write to the cache backend (for example a network-accessible Redis instance with weak/no auth, shared cache infrastructure reachable by other tenants/services, or a writable SQLite cache file)
Example (enabling a cache backend and opting a node into caching):
from langgraph.cache.memory import InMemoryCache
from langgraph.graph import StateGraph
from langgraph.types import CachePolicy
def my_node(state: dict) -> dict:
return {"value": state.get("value", 0) + 1}
builder = StateGraph(dict)
builder.add_node("my_node", my_node, cache_policy=CachePolicy(ttl=120))
builder.set_entry_point("my_node")
graph = builder.compile(cache=InMemoryCache())
result = graph.invoke({"value": 1})
With pickle_fallback=True, when msgpack serialization fails, JsonPlusSerializer can fall back to storing values as a ("pickle", <bytes>) tuple and later deserialize them via pickle.loads(...). If an attacker can place a malicious pickle payload into the cache backend such that the LangGraph process reads and deserializes it, this can lead to arbitrary code execution.
Exploitation requires attacker write access to the cache backend. The serializer is not exposed as a network-facing API.
This is fixed in langgraph-checkpoint>=4.0.0 by disabling pickle fallback by default (pickle_fallback=False).
Impact
Arbitrary code execution in the LangGraph process when attacker-controlled cache entries are deserialized.
Root Cause
-
BaseCachedefault serializer configuration inherited by cache implementations (InMemoryCache,RedisCache,SqliteCache):libs/checkpoint/langgraph/cache/base/__init__.py(pre-fix default:JsonPlusSerializer(pickle_fallback=True))
-
JsonPlusSerializerdeserialization sink:libs/checkpoint/langgraph/checkpoint/serde/jsonplus.pyloads_typed(...)callspickle.loads(data_)whentype_ == "pickle"and pickle fallback is enabled
Attack preconditions
An attacker must be able to write attacker-controlled bytes into the cache backend such that the LangGraph process later reads and deserializes them.
This typically requires write access to a networked cache (for example a network-accessible Redis instance with weak/no auth or shared cache infrastructure reachable by other tenants/services) or write access to local cache storage (for example a writable SQLite cache file via permissive file permissions or a shared writable volume).
Because exploitation requires write access to the cache storage layer, this is a post-compromise / post-access escalation vector.
Remediation
- Upgrade to
langgraph-checkpoint>=4.0.0.
Resources
- ZDI-CAN-28385
- Patch: https://github.com/langchain-ai/langgraph/pull/6677
- Patch diff: https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/langchain-ai/langgraph/pull/6677.patch
- Credit: Peter Girnus (@gothburz), Demeng Chen, and Brandon Niemczyk (Trend Micro Zero Day Initiative)
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | langgraph-checkpoint | all versions | 4.0.0pip install --upgrade 'langgraph-checkpoint==4.0.0' |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for langgraph-checkpoint, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update langgraph-checkpoint to 4.0.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-mhr3-j7m5-c7c9 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Do not deserialise data from untrusted sources: where the format allows it, restrict deserialisation to an explicit allowlist of expected types, and prefer a data-only format (JSON, Protobuf) over one that can reconstruct arbitrary objects until you can upgrade.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-mhr3-j7m5-c7c9 in your dependencies?
Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.