Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹 Go

GHSA-m98w-cqp3-qcqr

Fiber Utils UUIDv4 and UUID Silent Fallback to Predictable Values

Also known asCVE-2025-66565GO-2025-4208
Published
Dec 8, 2025
Updated
Dec 15, 2025
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
2 / 2
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.4%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk32th percentile+0.32%
0.00%0.30%0.60%0.90%0.1%0.4%Jan 26Apr 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

2 pkgs affected
🐹github.com/gofiber/utils/v2🐹github.com/gofiber/utils

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

Critical security vulnerabilities exist in both the UUIDv4() and UUID() functions of the github.com/gofiber/utils package. When the system's cryptographic random number generator (crypto/rand) fails, both functions silently fall back to returning predictable UUID values, the zero UUID "00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000". This compromises the security of all Fiber applications using these functions for security-critical operations on Go versions prior to 1.24.

Both functions are vulnerable to the same root cause (crypto/rand failure):

  • UUIDv4(): Indirect vulnerability through uuid.NewRandom()crypto/rand.Read() → fallback to UUID()
  • UUID(): Direct vulnerability through crypto/rand.Read(uuidSeed[:]) → silent zero UUID return

Note: Go 1.24 and later panics on crypto/rand Read() failures, mitigating this vulnerability. Applications running on Go 1.24+ are not affected by the silent fallback behavior.


Vulnerability Details

Affected Functions

  • Package: github.com/gofiber/utils
  • Functions: UUIDv4() and UUID()
  • Return Type: string (both functions)
  • Locations: common.go:93-99 (UUIDv4), common.go:60-89 (UUID)

Technical Description

The vulnerability occurs through two related but distinct failure paths, both ultimately caused by crypto/rand.Read() failures on Go < 1.24:

Primary Path: UUIDv4() Vulnerability

  1. UUIDv4() calls google/uuid.NewRandom() which internally uses crypto/rand.Read()
  2. If uuid.NewRandom() fails, UUIDv4() falls back to the internal UUID() function
  3. No error is returned to the application - silent security failure occurs

Secondary Path: UUID() Vulnerability

  1. UUID() directly calls crypto/rand.Read(uuidSeed[:]) to seed its internal state
  2. If seeding fails, UUID() silently fails and returns the zero UUID "00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000"
  3. Applications receive predictable UUIDs with no indication of the security failure

Code Analysis

UUIDv4() Vulnerability Path

func UUIDv4() string {
	token, err := uuid.NewRandom()  // Uses crypto/rand.Read() internally
	if err != nil {
		return UUID()  // Dangerous fallback - no error returned to application
	}
	return token.String()
}

UUID() Vulnerability Path

func UUID() string {
	uuidSetup.Do(func() {
		if _, err := rand.Read(uuidSeed[:]); err != nil {  // Direct crypto/rand.Read() call
			return  // Silent failure - no seeding, uuidCounter remains 0
		}
		uuidCounter = binary.LittleEndian.Uint64(uuidSeed[:8])
	})
	if atomic.LoadUint64(&uuidCounter) <= 0 {
		return "00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000"  // Zero UUID returned silently
	}
	// ... generate UUID from counter
}

Root Cause: Both vulnerabilities stem from crypto/rand.Read() failures, occurring through different code paths with the same dangerous silent fallback behavior.


Security Impact

Severity: CRITICAL

This issue is especially severe because many Fiber middleware packages (session, CSRF, auth, rate-limit, request-ID, etc.) default to utils.UUIDv4() for generating security-sensitive identifiers. A failure in crypto/rand would cause every generated identifier across the entire application to collapse to a single predictable value (the zero UUID), resulting in:

  • Session fixation / universal session hijack
  • CSRF token predictability and bypass
  • Authentication token replay
  • Global identifier collisions leading to severe application breakage
  • Potential application-wide DoS due to every request using the same “unique” key, causing cache overwrites, session stomping, corrupted internal maps, and loss of isolation across all users

Attack Scenario

While entropy exhaustion is extremely rare on modern Linux systems, RNG access failures (e.g., restricted /dev/random or /dev/urandom access, broken container environments, sandbox restrictions, misconfigured VMs, or FIPS-mode RNG failures) are realistic. In these scenarios on Go < 1.24, crypto/rand may return errors immediately — triggering the vulnerable fallback paths.

On Go 1.24+, crypto/rand Read() panics on failure, mitigating the silent-zero fallback issue.


Proof of Concept

  1. uuid.NewRandom() fails (indirect crypto/rand.Read() failure)
  2. UUIDv4() calls UUID() as fallback with no error returned
  3. UUID() seeding fails directly via crypto/rand.Read(uuidSeed[:])
  4. Zero UUID "00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" is returned silently
  5. No error is propagated to the application from either function

Affected Versions

  • All versions of github.com/gofiber/utils containing the UUIDv4() or UUID() functions
  • Applications using Fiber middleware that depend on UUIDv4() or UUID for security
  • Only applicable to Go < 1.24; Go 1.24+ panics/block on crypto/rand Read() failures and is not affected

Mitigation

Immediate Workaround

Replace usage of utils.UUIDv4() with uuid.New() or wait for fix:

sessionID := uuid.New()

Recommended Fix

Modify utils.UUIDv4() and utils.UUID() to fail explicitly when cryptographic randomness is unavailable:

func UUIDv4() string {
	token, err := uuid.NewRandom()
	if err != nil {
		panic(fmt.Sprintf("utils: failed to generate secure UUID: %v", err))
	}
	return token.String()
}

func UUID() string {
    uuidSetup.Do(func() {
        if _, err := rand.Read(uuidSeed[:]); err != nil {
            panic(fmt.Sprintf("utils: failed to seed UUID generator: %v", err))
        }
        uuidCounter = binary.LittleEndian.Uint64(uuidSeed[:8])
    })
    if atomic.LoadUint64(&uuidCounter) <= 0 {
        panic("utils: UUID generator not properly seeded")
    }
    // ... generate UUID from counter
}

Detection

Applications can detect if they're affected by:

  1. Checking if they use github.com/gofiber/utils
  2. Searching for UUIDv4() and UUID() usage in security-critical code paths
  3. Reviewing Fiber middleware configurations that rely on defaults of UUIDv4() for security identifiers

References


Contact

Reported by: @sixcolors


Classification

  • OWASP: A02:2021 - Cryptographic Failures
  • Impact: Complete compromise of application security model on Go < 1.24
  • Exploitability: Medium (requires entropy failure)
  • Scope: All Fiber applications using affected middleware on Go < 1.24

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/gofiber/utils/v2all versions2.0.0-rc.4
🐹Gogithub.com/gofiber/utilsall versions1.2.0

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/gofiber/utils/v2. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update github.com/gofiber/utils/v2 to 2.0.0-rc.4 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-m98w-cqp3-qcqr is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-m98w-cqp3-qcqr is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-m98w-cqp3-qcqr. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary Critical security vulnerabilities exist in both the `UUIDv4()` and `UUID()` functions of the `github.com/gofiber/utils` package. When the system's cryptographic random number generator (`crypto/rand`) fails, both functions silently fall back to returning predictable UUID values, the zero UUID `"00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000"`. This compromises the security of all Fiber applications using these functions for security-critical operations on **Go versions prior to 1.24**. **Both functions are vulnerable to the same root cause (`crypto/rand` failure):** * `UUIDv4()`: Indirect
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-m98w-cqp3-qcqr in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-m98w-cqp3-qcqr across Go dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.

GHSA-m98w-cqp3-qcqr: v2 Cross-Site Request Forgery | O3 Security