Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹 Go
Not in CISA KEV

GHSA-m468-xcm6-fxg4 Nginx-UI

GHSA-m468-xcm6-fxg4 is a CWE-362 vulnerability in github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI. A fix is available for github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI — see the affected versions and patch details below.

nginx-ui has Race Condition that Leads to Persistent Data Corruption and Service Collapse

Also known asCVE-2026-33028GO-2026-4906
Published
Mar 30, 2026
Updated
Sep 10, 2026
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
1 / 2
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 18, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-m468-xcm6-fxg4.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.5%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs44th percentile — riskier than 44% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Real-World Exposure

2 pkgs affected
🐹github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI🐹github.com/uozi-tech/cosy

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

The nginx-ui application is vulnerable to a Race Condition. Due to the complete absence of synchronization mechanisms (Mutex) and non-atomic file writes, concurrent requests lead to the severe corruption of the primary configuration file (app.ini). This vulnerability results in a persistent Denial of Service (DoS) and introduces a non-deterministic path for Remote Code Execution (RCE) through configuration cross-contamination.

Details

The vulnerability exists because the settings update pipeline does not implement any synchronization primitives. When multiple requests reach the handler simultaneously:

  1. Memory Corruption: ProtectedFill() modifies shared global singleton pointers without thread-safety, leading to inconsistent states in memory.
  2. File Corruption: The underlying library (gopkg.in/ini.v1) performs direct overwrites. Concurrent write operations interleave at the OS level, resulting in app.ini files with empty leading lines, truncated fields, or partially overwritten configuration keys.
  3. State Persistent Failure: Depending on which bytes are corrupted, the application either fails its "is-installed" check (redirecting to /install) or encounters a fatal error during boot/runtime that prevents the process from responding to any further requests.

Environment:

  • OS: Kali Linux 6.17.10-1kali1 (6.17.10+kali-amd64)
  • Application Version: nginx-ui v2.3.3 (513) e5da6dd (go1.26.0)
  • Deployment: Docker Container

PoC

  1. Check original app.ini file valid state:

    <img width="524" height="367" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d9688f76-7fe7-46ea-9eb9-c55bf40918a6" />
  2. Log in to the nginx-ui dashboard.

  3. Navigate to Preferences and update settings. Capture a POST /api/settings request and send it to Burp Suite Intruder.

  4. Configure the attack with Null payloads (to test basic concurrency) or a Fuzzing list (to test data-driven corruption).

  5. Set the Resource Pool to 20-50 concurrent requests.

    <img width="1188" height="776" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/403eef43-2bc6-4651-8802-15ddcb4f7631" />
  6. Observation (In-flight corruption): Monitor the app.ini file. You will observe the file being written with empty leading lines or incomplete key-value pairs.

  • <img width="1316" height="390" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d99553f7-d253-4525-9b45-f59994e69180" />

  • <img width="1368" height="709" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7522ba29-39f1-4c22-88f2-8e859cdb1984" />
  1. Observation (Recovery Failure): If the service redirects to /install, attempting to complete the setup again often fails because the underlying configuration state is too corrupted to be reconciled by the installer logic.
  2. Observation (Total Service Collapse): When the corruption in app.ini becomes so severe, the Go runtime or the INI parser encounters a fatal error, causing the Nginx-UI service to stop responding entirely (Hard DoS).
<img width="1344" height="542" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/da4b99dc-ddce-4b79-b0bb-2d634bdd3bf7" />
  1. Observation (Cross-Section Contamination): During testing, it was observed that sometimes INI sections become interleaved. For example, fields belonging to the [nginx] section (like ConfigDir or ReloadCmd) were erroneously written under the [webauthn] section.

    Example of corrupted output observed:

[webauthn]
RPDisplayName  = 
RPID           = 
RPOrigins      = 
gDirWhiteList  = 
ConfigDir      = /etc/nginx
ConfigPath     = 
PIDPath        = /run/nginx.pid
SbinPath       = 
TestConfigCmd  = 
ReloadCmd      = nginx -s reload
RestartCmd     = nginx -s stop
StubStatusPort = 51820
ContainerName  = 

Impact

This is a High security risk (CWE-362: Race Condition).

  • Integrity: Permanent corruption of application settings and system-level configuration.
  • Availability: High. The attack results in a persistent Denial of Service that cannot be recovered via the web UI.
  • Remote Code Execution (RCE) Risk: Since the application allows updating certain fields (like Node Name) and uses others as shell commands (like ReloadCmd or RestartCmd), the observed "cross-contamination" of INI values means an attacker could potentially force a user-controlled string into a command execution field. If ReloadCmd is overwritten with a malicious payload provided in another field, the next nginx reload will execute that payload. While highly impactful, this specific exploit path is non-deterministic and depends on the precise interleaving of thread execution, making targeted exploitation difficult.

Recommended Mitigation

  1. Implement Mutex Locking: Wrap the ProtectedFill and settings.Save() calls in a sync.Mutex to serialize access to global settings.
  2. Atomic File Writes: Implement a "write-then-rename" strategy. Write the new configuration to app.ini.tmp and use os.Rename() to replace the original file atomically, ensuring the configuration file is always in a valid state.

A patched version of nginx-ui is available at https://github.com/0xJacky/nginx-ui/releases/tag/v2.3.4.

Affected Packages

2 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UIall versionsNo fix
🐹Gogithub.com/uozi-tech/cosyall versions1.30.1go get github.com/uozi-tech/cosy@v1.30.1

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    No patched version of github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI has shipped for GHSA-m468-xcm6-fxg4 yet. Where your build allows, override or pin the dependency away from the vulnerable range, and apply any maintainer-recommended mitigation.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-m468-xcm6-fxg4 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-m468-xcm6-fxg4. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary The `nginx-ui` application is vulnerable to a **Race Condition**. Due to the complete absence of synchronization mechanisms (Mutex) and non-atomic file writes, concurrent requests lead to the severe corruption of the primary configuration file (`app.ini`). This vulnerability results in a persistent Denial of Service (DoS) and introduces a non-deterministic path for **Remote Code Execution (RCE)** through configuration cross-contamination. ### Details The vulnerability exists because the settings update pipeline does not implement any synchronization primitives. When multiple reque
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-m468-xcm6-fxg4 in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-m468-xcm6-fxg4 across Go dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-m468-xcm6-fxg4: Nginx-UI RCE | O3 Security