Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹 Go

GHSA-m3q4-7qmj-657m

OpenFGA Authorization Bypass

Also known asCVE-2022-23542GO-2022-1179
Published
Dec 20, 2022
Updated
Aug 21, 2024
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.9%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk55th percentile+0.49%
0.00%0.47%0.94%1.41%0.0%0.9%Dec 25Apr 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected
🐹github.com/openfga/openfga

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Overview

During our internal security assessment, it was discovered that OpenFGA versions v0.3.0 is vulnerable to authorization bypass under certain conditions.

Am I Affected?

You are affected by this vulnerability if all of the following applies:

  1. You are using OpenFGA v0.3.0
  2. You created a model using modeling language v1.1 that applies a type restriction to an object e.g. define viewer: [user]
  3. You created tuples based on the aforementioned model, e.g. document:1#viewer@user:jon
  4. You updated the previous model by adding a new type and replacing the previous restriction with the newly added type e.g. define viewer: [employee]
  5. You use the tuples created against the first model (step 3) and issue checks against the updated model e.g. user=user:jon, relation=viewer, object:document:1

How to fix that?

Upgrade to version v0.3.1

Backward Compatibility

This update is backward compatible.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/openfga/openfga0.3.0&&< 0.3.10.3.1

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/openfga/openfga. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update github.com/openfga/openfga to 0.3.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-m3q4-7qmj-657m is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-m3q4-7qmj-657m is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-m3q4-7qmj-657m. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Overview During our internal security assessment, it was discovered that OpenFGA versions v0.3.0 is vulnerable to authorization bypass under certain conditions. ### Am I Affected? You are affected by this vulnerability if **all** of the following applies: 1. You are using OpenFGA v0.3.0 2. You created a model using modeling language v1.1 that applies a type restriction to an object e.g. `define viewer: [user]` 3. You created tuples based on the aforementioned model, e.g. `document:1#viewer@user:jon` 4. You updated the previous model by adding a new type and replacing the previous restri
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-m3q4-7qmj-657m in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-m3q4-7qmj-657m across Go dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.