GHSA-m3pm-rpgg-5wj6 is a high-severity (CVSS 7) CWE-940 vulnerability in homeassistant. A fix is available for homeassistant — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Home Assistant does not correctly validate SSL for outgoing requests in core and used libs
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-m3pm-rpgg-5wj6 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 379,145 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
homeassistantReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
Problem: Potential man-in-the-middle attacks due to missing SSL certificate verification in the project codebase and used third-party libraries.
Details
In the past, aiohttp-session/request had the parameter verify_ssl to control SSL certificate verification. This was a boolean value. In aiohttp 3.0, this parameter was deprecated in favor of the ssl parameter. Only when ssl is set to None or provided with a correct configured SSL context the standard SSL certificate verification will happen.
When migrating integrations in Home Assistant and libraries used by Home Assistant, in some cases the verify_ssl parameter value was just moved to the new ssl parameter. This resulted in these integrations and 3rd party libraries using request.ssl = True, which unintentionally turned off SSL certificate verification and opened up a man-in-the-middle attack vector.
When you scan the libraries used by the integrations in Home Assistant, you will find more issues like this.
The general handling in Home Assistant looks good, as homeassistant.helpers.aoihttp_client._async_get_connector handles it correctly.
PoC
- Check that expired.badssl.com:443 gives an SSL error in when connecting with curl or browser.
- Add the integration adguard with the setting
host=expired.badssl.com,port=443,use-ssl=true,verify-ssl=true. - Check the logs - you get a HTTP 403 response.
Expected behavior:
- The integration log shows an
ssl.SSLCertVerificationError.
The following code shows the problem with ssl=True. No exception is raised when ssl=True (Python 3.11.6).
import asyncio
from ssl import SSLCertVerificationError
import aiohttp
BAD_URL = "https://expired.badssl.com/"
async def run_request(verify_ssl, result_placeholder: str):
async with aiohttp.ClientSession() as session:
exception_fired: bool = False
try:
await session.request("OPTIONS", BAD_URL, ssl=verify_ssl)
except SSLCertVerificationError:
exception_fired = True
except Exception as error:
print(error)
else:
exception_fired = False
print(result_placeholder.format(exception_result=exception_fired))
# Case 1: ssl=False --> expected result: No exception
asyncio.run(run_request(False, "Test case 1: expected result: False - result: {exception_result}"))
# Case 2: ssl=None --> expected result: Exception
asyncio.run(run_request(None, "Test case 2: expected result: True - result: {exception_result}"))
# Case 3: ssl=True --> expected result: No Exception
asyncio.run(run_request(True, "Test case 3: expected result: False - result: {exception_result}"))
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | homeassistant | all versions | 2024.1.6pip install --upgrade 'homeassistant==2024.1.6' |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for homeassistant, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update homeassistant to 2024.1.6 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-m3pm-rpgg-5wj6 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-m3pm-rpgg-5wj6 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to GHSA-m3pm-rpgg-5wj6. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-m3pm-rpgg-5wj6 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds GHSA-m3pm-rpgg-5wj6 across PyPI dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.