Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🦀 crates.io

GHSA-m2gf-x3f6-8hq3

HIGH

Deno is Vulnerable to Command Injection on Windows During Batch File Execution

Also known asCVE-2025-61787
Published
Oct 8, 2025
Updated
Oct 8, 2025
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
2.1%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk79th percentile+1.94%
0.00%0.90%1.81%2.71%0.5%2.1%Dec 25Apr 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected
🦀deno

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects crates.io packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

Deno versions up to 2.5.1 are vulnerable to Command Line Injection attacks on Windows when batch files are executed.

Details

In Windows, CreateProcess() always implicitly spawns cmd.exe if a batch file (.bat, .cmd, etc.) is being executed even if the application does not specify it via the command line. This makes Deno vulnerable to a command injection attack on Windows as demonstrated by the two proves-of-concept below.

PoC

Using node:child_process (with the env and run permissions):

const { spawn } = require('node:child_process');
const child = spawn('./test.bat', ['&calc.exe']);

Using Deno.Command.spawn() (with the run permission):

const command = new Deno.Command('./test.bat', {
  args: ['&calc.exe'],
});
const child = command.spawn();

Impact

Both of these scripts result in opening calc.exe on Windows, thus allowing a Command Line Injection attack when user-provided arguments are passed if the script being executed by the child process is a batch script.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🦀crates.iodenoall versions2.5.2

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for deno. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update deno to 2.5.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-m2gf-x3f6-8hq3 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-m2gf-x3f6-8hq3 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-m2gf-x3f6-8hq3. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary Deno versions up to 2.5.1 are vulnerable to Command Line Injection attacks on Windows when batch files are executed. ### Details In Windows, ``CreateProcess()`` always implicitly spawns ``cmd.exe`` if a batch file (.bat, .cmd, etc.) is being executed even if the application does not specify it via the command line. This makes Deno vulnerable to a command injection attack on Windows as demonstrated by the two proves-of-concept below. ### PoC Using `node:child_process` (with the `env` and `run` permissions): ```JS const { spawn } = require('node:child_process'); const child = spawn
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-m2gf-x3f6-8hq3 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-m2gf-x3f6-8hq3 across crates.io dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.