Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍 PyPI

GHSA-jfjg-vc52-wqvf

HIGH

BentoML has Dockerfile Command Injection via system_packages in bentofile.yaml

Also known asCVE-2026-33744PYSEC-2026-157
Published
Mar 26, 2026
Updated
Jun 8, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk17th percentile+0.25%
0.00%0.25%0.50%0.76%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.3%Apr 26Jun 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected
🐍bentoml

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

The docker.system_packages field in bentofile.yaml accepts arbitrary strings that are interpolated directly into Dockerfile RUN commands without sanitization. Since system_packages is semantically a list of OS package names (data), users do not expect values to be interpreted as shell commands. A malicious bentofile.yaml achieves arbitrary command execution during bentoml containerize / docker build.

Affected Component

  • src/_bentoml_sdk/images.py:85-89.format(packages=" ".join(packages)) into shell command
  • src/bentoml/_internal/container/frontend/dockerfile/templates/base_debian.j2:13{{ __options__system_packages | join(' ') }}
  • src/bentoml/_internal/bento/build_config.py:174 — No validation on system_packages
  • All distro install commands in src/bentoml/_internal/container/frontend/dockerfile/__init__.py

Affected Versions

All versions supporting docker.system_packages in bentofile.yaml, confirmed on 1.4.36.

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Create a project directory with:

service.py:

import bentoml

@bentoml.service
class MyService:
    @bentoml.api
    def predict(self) -> str:
        return "hello"

bentofile.yaml:

service: "service:MyService"
docker:
  system_packages:
    - "curl && id > /tmp/bentoml-pwned #"
  1. Run:
bentoml build
  1. Examine the generated Dockerfile at ~/bentoml/bentos/my_service/<tag>/env/docker/Dockerfile. Line 41 will contain:
RUN apt-get install -q -y -o Dpkg::Options::=--force-confdef curl && id > /tmp/bentoml-pwned #
  1. Running bentoml containerize my_service:<tag> will execute id > /tmp/bentoml-pwned as root during the Docker build.

Root Cause

The system_packages field values are treated as package names (data) by the user but are string-formatted directly into shell commands in the Dockerfile:

# images.py:85-89
self.commands.append(
    CONTAINER_METADATA[self.distro]["install_command"].format(
        packages=" ".join(packages)  # No escaping
    )
)

Where install_command is "apt-get install -q -y -o Dpkg::Options::=--force-confdef {packages}".

A bash_quote filter (wrapping shlex.quote) exists in the codebase and is registered in both Jinja2 environments, but it is only applied to environment variable values, never to system_packages.

Impact

  1. Malicious repositories: An attacker publishes an ML project with a crafted bentofile.yaml. Anyone who clones and builds it gets arbitrary code execution during docker build.
  2. CI/CD compromise: Automated pipelines running bentoml containerize on PRs that modify bentofile.yaml are vulnerable.
  3. BentoCloud: If BentoCloud builds images from user-supplied bentofile.yaml, this could achieve RCE on cloud infrastructure.
  4. Supply chain: Shared bentos or model repos in the BentoML ecosystem can contain malicious configs.

Suggested Fix

Option 1: Input validation (recommended)

Add a regex validator to system_packages in build_config.py:

import re

VALID_PACKAGE_NAME = re.compile(r'^[a-zA-Z0-9][a-zA-Z0-9.+\-_:]*$')

def _validate_system_packages(instance, attribute, value):
    if value is None:
        return
    for pkg in value:
        if not VALID_PACKAGE_NAME.match(pkg):
            raise BentoMLException(
                f"Invalid system package name: {pkg!r}. "
                "Package names may only contain alphanumeric characters, "
                "dots, plus signs, hyphens, underscores, and colons."
            )

system_packages: t.Optional[t.List[str]] = attr.field(
    default=None, validator=_validate_system_packages
)

Option 2: Output escaping

Apply shlex.quote() to each package name before interpolation in images.py:system_packages() and apply the bash_quote Jinja2 filter in base_debian.j2.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIbentomlall versions1.4.37

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for bentoml. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update bentoml to 1.4.37 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-jfjg-vc52-wqvf is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-jfjg-vc52-wqvf is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-jfjg-vc52-wqvf. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary The `docker.system_packages` field in `bentofile.yaml` accepts arbitrary strings that are interpolated directly into Dockerfile `RUN` commands without sanitization. Since `system_packages` is semantically a list of OS package names (data), users do not expect values to be interpreted as shell commands. A malicious `bentofile.yaml` achieves arbitrary command execution during `bentoml containerize` / `docker build`. ## Affected Component - `src/_bentoml_sdk/images.py:85-89` — `.format(packages=" ".join(packages))` into shell command - `src/bentoml/_internal/container/frontend/docke
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-jfjg-vc52-wqvf in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-jfjg-vc52-wqvf across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.