Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹 Go

GHSA-jc7w-c686-c4v9

MEDIUM

github.com/ulikunitz/xz leaks memory when decoding a corrupted multiple LZMA archives

Also known asCVE-2025-58058GO-2025-3922
Published
Aug 28, 2025
Updated
Feb 4, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.4%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk30th percentile+0.36%
0.00%0.29%0.59%0.89%0.1%0.4%Dec 25Apr 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected
🐹github.com/ulikunitz/xz

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

It is possible to put data in front of an LZMA-encoded byte stream without detecting the situation while reading the header. This can lead to increased memory consumption because the current implementation allocates the full decoding buffer directly after reading the header. The LZMA header doesn't include a magic number or has a checksum to detect such an issue according to the specification.

Note that the code recognizes the issue later while reading the stream, but at this time the memory allocation has already been done.

Mitigations

The release v0.5.15 includes following mitigations:

  • The ReaderConfig DictCap field is now interpreted as a limit for the dictionary size.
  • The default is 2 Gigabytes - 1 byte (2^31-1 bytes).
  • Users can check with the [Reader.Header] method what the actual values are in their LZMA files and set a smaller limit using ReaderConfig.
  • The dictionary size will not exceed the larger of the file size and the minimum dictionary size. This is another measure to prevent huge memory allocations for the dictionary.
  • The code supports stream sizes only up to a pebibyte (1024^5).

Note that the original v0.5.14 version had a compiler error for 32 bit platforms, which has been fixed by v0.5.15.

Methods affected

Only software that uses lzma.NewReader or lzma.ReaderConfig.NewReader is affected. There is no issue for software using the xz functionality.

I thank @GregoryBuligin for his report, which is provided below.

Summary

When unpacking a large number of LZMA archives, even in a single goroutine, if the first byte of the archive file is 0 (a zero byte added to the beginning), an error writeMatch: distance out of range occurs. Memory consumption spikes sharply, and the GC clearly cannot handle this situation.

Details

Judging by the error writeMatch: distance out of range, the problems occur in the code around this function. https://github.com/ulikunitz/xz/blob/c8314b8f21e9c5e25b52da07544cac14db277e89/lzma/decoderdict.go#L81

PoC

Run a function similar to this one in 1 or several goroutines on a multitude of LZMA archives that have a 0 (a zero byte) added to the beginning.

const ProjectLocalPath = "some/path"
const TmpDir = "tmp"

func UnpackLZMA(lzmaFile string) error {
	file, err := os.Open(lzmaFile)
	if err != nil {
		return err
	}
	defer file.Close()

	reader, err := lzma.NewReader(bufio.NewReader(file))
	if err != nil {
		return err
	}

	tmpFile, err := os.CreateTemp(TmpDir, TmpLZMAPrefix)
	if err != nil {
		return err
	}
	defer func() {
		tmpFile.Close()
		_ = os.Remove(tmpFile.Name())
	}()

	sha256Hasher := sha256.New()
	multiWriter := io.MultiWriter(tmpFile, sha256Hasher)

	if _, err = io.Copy(multiWriter, reader); err != nil {
		return err
	}

	unpackHash := hex.EncodeToString(sha256Hasher.Sum(nil))
	unpackDir := filepath.Join(
		ProjectLocalPath, unpackHash[:2],
	)
	_ = os.MkdirAll(unpackDir, DirPerm)

	unpackPath := filepath.Join(unpackDir, unpackHash)

	return os.Rename(tmpFile.Name(), unpackPath)
}

Impact

Servers with a small amount of RAM that download and unpack a large number of unverified LZMA archives

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/ulikunitz/xzall versions0.5.15

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/ulikunitz/xz. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update github.com/ulikunitz/xz to 0.5.15 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-jc7w-c686-c4v9 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-jc7w-c686-c4v9 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-jc7w-c686-c4v9. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary It is possible to put data in front of an LZMA-encoded byte stream without detecting the situation while reading the header. This can lead to increased memory consumption because the current implementation allocates the full decoding buffer directly after reading the header. The LZMA header doesn't include a magic number or has a checksum to detect such an issue according to the [specification](https://github.com/jljusten/LZMA-SDK/blob/master/DOC/lzma-specification.txt). Note that the code recognizes the issue later while reading the stream, but at this time the memory allocatio
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-jc7w-c686-c4v9 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-jc7w-c686-c4v9 across Go dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.