How severe is GHSA-j8cx-j9j2-f29w?

No CVSS score has been assigned to GHSA-j8cx-j9j2-f29w yet. Review the advisory details and affected package list to assess your exposure.

Which packages are affected by GHSA-j8cx-j9j2-f29w?

GHSA-j8cx-j9j2-f29w affects the following packages: microweber/microweber (Packagist). Ecosystems affected: Packagist.

How do I fix GHSA-j8cx-j9j2-f29w?

Update microweber/microweber to 1.3 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-j8cx-j9j2-f29w is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

How do I detect GHSA-j8cx-j9j2-f29w in my Packagist dependencies?

Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for microweber/microweber, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

How do I mitigate GHSA-j8cx-j9j2-f29w if there is no patch (or I can't update yet)?

If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

Is GHSA-j8cx-j9j2-f29w actively exploited in the wild?

Yes. There are 1 known exploit references for GHSA-j8cx-j9j2-f29w, including 1 in-the-wild exploitation observed on GitHub and other sources. Treat this as actively exploitable and prioritize patching immediately. All exploit code should only be run in an isolated sandbox environment for research or authorized testing — never against production systems without explicit written authorization.

What is the EPSS score for GHSA-j8cx-j9j2-f29w?

GHSA-j8cx-j9j2-f29w has an EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) score of 1.3%, placing it in the 71th percentile of all CVEs. EPSS is maintained by FIRST.org and estimates the probability that a vulnerability will be exploited in the wild within the next 30 days. This score indicates relatively lower exploitation probability, though the CVSS severity should still guide your patching priority.

What type of vulnerability is GHSA-j8cx-j9j2-f29w?

GHSA-j8cx-j9j2-f29w is classified as CWE-922 (CWE-922). This weakness type describe the underlying flaw category, which helps determine the potential impact and the right class of mitigation.

When was GHSA-j8cx-j9j2-f29w published, and has it been updated?

GHSA-j8cx-j9j2-f29w was published on February 24, 2022 and was last updated on December 5, 2024. Advisory data evolves as severity scores, affected ranges, and exploit intelligence are revised — always check the latest version of the advisory before acting.

🐘 Packagist

Not in CISA KEV

Insecure Storage of Sensitive Information in MicroweberGHSA-j8cx-j9j2-f29w

Fix: microweber/microweber@b592c86

GHSA-j8cx-j9j2-f29w is a CWE-922 vulnerability in microweber/microweber. 1 public exploit reference exists, so weaponization risk is real. A fix is available for microweber/microweber — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Also known asCVE-2022-0724

Published

Feb 24, 2022

Updated

Dec 5, 2024

Affected

1 pkg

Patched

1 / 1

Exploits

1 known

Exploitation data as of Oct 11, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗

1.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days

Lower Risk0.00%

Lower risk than most CVEs71th percentile — riskier than 71% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected

🐘microweber/microweber

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Microweber prior to version 1.3 does not strip images of EXIF data, exposing information about users' locations, device hardware, and device software.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed

Ecosystem	Package	Vulnerable range	Fix
🐘Packagist	`microweber/microweber`	all versions	1.3`composer require microweber/microweber:^1.3`

Affected Products

1 product · 1 configurations

Application

microwebermicroweber

< 1.3

range

Exploits & PoCs

Research use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.

Insecure Storage of Sensitive Information in GitHub repository microwebe…

huntr.devNVDMar 2022

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency

Detect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for microweber/microweber, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update microweber/microweber to 1.3 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-j8cx-j9j2-f29w is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

Frequently Asked Questions

Microweber prior to version 1.3 does not strip images of EXIF data, exposing information about users' locations, device hardware, and device software.

O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-j8cx-j9j2-f29w in your dependencies?

Find it across Packagist, including transitive dependencies.

Scan my dependencies How O3 SCA works