Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹
🐹 Go
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

GHSA-j6f6-jp3p-53mw juju

MEDIUMFix: juju/juju@22cdcf6

GHSA-j6f6-jp3p-53mw is a medium-severity (CVSS 4.9) CWE-863 vulnerability in github.com/juju/juju. A fix is available for github.com/juju/juju — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Juju: Read All Controller Logs From Compromised Workload

Also known asCVE-2025-68152GO-2026-5451
Published
Apr 3, 2026
Updated
Jun 25, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 18, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-j6f6-jp3p-53mw.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.4%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs30th percentile — riskier than 30% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-j6f6-jp3p-53mw plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 377,166 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐹github.com/juju/juju

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

It is possible that a compromised workload machine under a Juju controller can read any log file for any entity in any model at any level.

There is a debug log endpoint in the API server that allows streaming of logs off of the controller. To access this endpoint you must be authentication and either be a machine agent, controller agent, controller admin or have model read permission.

The problematic is the machine agent story. The rest of the other checks have a high enough degree of safety that an attacker can not move side ways in the controller when obtaining log files.

Details

A compromised workload machine is capable of obtaining logs for both the controller and any model under the controller at any log level they wish. A bad actor can use this information as signal for further attacks or possible gain secret information leaked out in debug and trace logs. On top of this they would also be able to receive the logs from the charm itself for which we have no control over.

  • here is where the authorizer is defined for the endpoint.
  • here is where the authorizer is checked.
  • here and onwards is the amount of information the attacker can gain access to.

PoC

If an attacker compromises a workload machine, they will have access to the agent.conf file containing the credentials. This can then be used to obtain debug logs for any part of the controller.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/juju/jujuall versions0.0.0-20250623030540-c91a1f404695go get github.com/juju/juju@v0.0.0-20250623030540-c91a1f404695

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/juju/juju, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update github.com/juju/juju to 0.0.0-20250623030540-c91a1f404695 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-j6f6-jp3p-53mw is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-j6f6-jp3p-53mw can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-j6f6-jp3p-53mw. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary It is possible that a compromised workload machine under a Juju controller can read any log file for any entity in any model at any level. There is a debug log endpoint in the API server that allows streaming of logs off of the controller. To access this endpoint you must be authentication and either be a machine agent, controller agent, controller admin or have model read permission. The problematic is the machine agent story. The rest of the other checks have a high enough degree of safety that an attacker can not move side ways in the controller when obtaining log files. ###
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-j6f6-jp3p-53mw in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-j6f6-jp3p-53mw across Go dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-j6f6-jp3p-53mw: juju (Medium 4.9) | O3 Security