GHSA-j563-grx4-pjpv — xstream
HIGHGHSA-j563-grx4-pjpv is a high-severity (CVSS 8.2) remote code execution vulnerability in com.thoughtworks.xstream:xstream. 3 public exploit references exist, so weaponization risk is real. A fix is available for com.thoughtworks.xstream:xstream — see the affected versions and patch details below.
XStream can cause Denial of Service via stack overflow
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-j563-grx4-pjpv.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-j563-grx4-pjpv plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 378,567 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
com.thoughtworks.xstream:xstreamReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Maven packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Impact
The vulnerability may allow a remote attacker to terminate the application with a stack overflow error resulting in a denial of service only by manipulating the processed input stream.
Patches
XStream 1.4.20 handles the stack overflow and raises an InputManipulationException instead.
Workarounds
The attack uses the hash code implementation for collections and maps to force recursive hash calculation causing a stack overflow. Following types of the Java runtime are affected:
- java.util.HashMap
- java.util.HashSet
- java.util.Hashtable
- java.util.LinkedHashMap
- java.util.LinkedHashSet
- Other third party collection implementations that use their element's hash code may also be affected
A simple solution is to catch the StackOverflowError in the client code calling XStream.
If your object graph does not use referenced elements at all, you may simply set the NO_REFERENCE mode:
XStream xstream = new XStream();
xstream.setMode(XStream.NO_REFERENCES);
If your object graph contains neither a Hashtable, HashMap nor a HashSet (or one of the linked variants of it) then you can use the security framework to deny the usage of these types:
XStream xstream = new XStream();
xstream.denyTypes(new Class[]{
java.util.HashMap.class, java.util.HashSet.class, java.util.Hashtable.class, java.util.LinkedHashMap.class, java.util.LinkedHashSet.class
});
Unfortunately these types are very common. If you only use HashMap or HashSet and your XML refers these only as default map or set, you may additionally change the default implementation of java.util.Map and java.util.Set at unmarshalling time::
xstream.addDefaultImplementation(java.util.TreeMap.class, java.util.Map.class);
xstream.addDefaultImplementation(java.util.TreeSet.class, java.util.Set.class);
However, this implies that your application does not care about the implementation of the map and all elements are comparable.
References
See full information about the nature of the vulnerability and the steps to reproduce it in XStream's documentation for CVE-2022-41966.
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:
- Open an issue in XStream
- Contact us at XStream Google Group
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| ☕Maven | com.thoughtworks.xstream:xstream | all versions | 1.4.20com.thoughtworks.xstream:xstream:1.4.20 |
Research use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for com.thoughtworks.xstream:xstream, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update com.thoughtworks.xstream:xstream to 1.4.20 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-j563-grx4-pjpv is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-j563-grx4-pjpv can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to GHSA-j563-grx4-pjpv. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
Red Hat Fuse 7 ships an affected version of XStream. No endpoint in any flavor of Fuse is accepting by default an unverified input stream passed directly to XStream unmarshaller. Documentation always recommend all the endpoints (TCP/UDP/HTTP(S)/other listeners) to have at least one layer of…
| Product | Fixed in | Advisory |
|---|---|---|
| Migration Toolkit for Runtimes 1 on RHEL 8 | mtr/mtr-web-container-rhel8:1.0-22 | RHSA-2023:1286 |
| MTA-6.1-RHEL-8 | mta/mta-windup-addon-rhel8:6.1.0-11 | RHSA-2023:2041 |
| OpenShift Developer Tools and Services for OCP 4.11 | jenkins-0:2.401.1.1686831596-3.el8 | RHSA-2023:3663 |
| Red Hat build of Quarkus 2.7.7 | see advisory | RHSA-2023:1006 |
| Red Hat Fuse 7.12 | xstream | RHSA-2023:3954 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.10 | jenkins-0:2.401.1.1685677065-1.el8 | RHSA-2023:3625 |
| RHINT Camel-Q 2.7-1 | see advisory | RHSA-2023:1177 |
| RHINT Camel-Springboot 3.20.1 | xstream | RHSA-2023:2100 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-j563-grx4-pjpv in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds GHSA-j563-grx4-pjpv across Maven dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.