Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹 Go

GHSA-j443-wcqq-xprh

CRITICAL

Terraform Provider for SendGrid: TLS Session Resumption Bypasses Certificate Authority Trust Store Modifications in Go

Also known asGO-2026-4673
Published
Mar 11, 2026
Updated
Mar 23, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
None yet
Exploits
None indexed

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected
🐹github.com/arslanbekov/terraform-provider-sendgrid

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

A critical vulnerability has been identified at https://security.snyk.io/package/linux/chainguard:latest/terraform-provider-sendgrid, associated with the underlying Go version.

If the server's TLS configuration is mutated between connections — for example, a CA is removed from the trusted list via Config.Clone() combined with modification or GetConfigForClient — the resumed handshake still succeeds using the cached session. The certificate is not re-checked against the updated CA list.

As a result, a client whose CA was revoked or removed between the first and second connection could still establish a connection on the resumed session.

Details

If the server's TLS configuration is mutated between connections — for example, a CA is removed from the trusted list via Config.Clone() combined with modification or GetConfigForClient — the resumed handshake still succeeds using the cached session. The certificate is not re-checked against the updated CA list.

Consequently, a client whose CA was revoked or removed between the first and second connection could still establish a connection on the resumed session.

Affected Packages

1 total
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/arslanbekov/terraform-provider-sendgridall versionsNo fix

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/arslanbekov/terraform-provider-sendgrid. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Remediation status

    No patched version of github.com/arslanbekov/terraform-provider-sendgrid has shipped for GHSA-j443-wcqq-xprh yet. Where your build allows, override or pin the dependency away from the vulnerable range, and apply any maintainer-recommended mitigation.

  3. Mitigate without a patch

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-j443-wcqq-xprh is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-j443-wcqq-xprh. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary A critical vulnerability has been identified at https://security.snyk.io/package/linux/chainguard:latest/terraform-provider-sendgrid, associated with the underlying Go version. If the server's TLS configuration is mutated between connections — for example, a CA is removed from the trusted list via `Config.Clone()` combined with modification or `GetConfigForClient` — the resumed handshake still succeeds using the cached session. The certificate is not re-checked against the updated CA list. As a result, a client whose CA was revoked or removed between the first and second connect
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-j443-wcqq-xprh in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-j443-wcqq-xprh across Go dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.