zlib-rs stack overflow during decompression with malicious inputGHSA-j3px-q95c-9683
MEDIUMGHSA-j3px-q95c-9683 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.3) remote code execution vulnerability in zlib-rs. A fix is available for zlib-rs — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Real-World Exposure
zlib-rs🦀libz-rs-sys🦀libz-rs-sys-cdylibReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects crates.io packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
A denial of service vulnerability was found in zlib-rs, triggered by specially constructed input. This input causes a stack overflow, resulting in the process using zlib-rs to crash.
Impact
Due to the way LLVM handles the zlib-rs codebase, tail calls were not guaranteed. This caused certain input patterns to result in a large number of stack frames being required, quickly resulting in a stack overflow. These are unlikely to occur in practice, but a dedicated attacker can construct malicious input files.
After stack overflows were found by @inahga with a fuzzer, we dove into the assembly, and found some cases where the stack grew
.LBB109_326:
mov rdi, rbx
call zlib_rs::inflate::State::type_do
jmp .LBB109_311
.LBB109_311:
lea rsp, [rbp - 40]
pop rbx
pop r12
pop r13
pop r14
pop r15
pop rbp
.cfi_def_cfa rsp, 8
ret
LLVM wants to centralize the cleanup before the return (many other blocks jump to LBB109_311), thereby invalidating a tail call to type_do. We were not able to get rid of this call without introducing one elsewhere: we just don't currently have the power to tell LLVM what we want it to do.
So, we switch back to loop+match waiting for changes to rust to make a more efficient implementation possible. Performance-wise, the damage is relatively minimal: we're just slower in cases where we already were slower than C. We are faster in cases where the relevant code is barely touched (in these cases the logic quickly moves into a hot inner loop and just spends most of its time there).
Patches
Version 0.4.0 patches the problem and is no longer vulnerable.
Workarounds
Users of zlib-rs should upgrade to the latest version. Users could alternatively run zlib-rs in a separate process to prevent a stack overflow crashing the entire program. In some situations a signal handler can be used to catch a stack overflow happening.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🦀crates.io | zlib-rs | all versions | 0.4.0cargo update -p zlib-rs --precise 0.4.0 |
| 🦀crates.io | libz-rs-sys | all versions | 0.4.0cargo update -p libz-rs-sys --precise 0.4.0 |
| 🦀crates.io | libz-rs-sys-cdylib | all versions | 0.4.0cargo update -p libz-rs-sys-cdylib --precise 0.4.0 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for zlib-rs, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update zlib-rs to 0.4.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-j3px-q95c-9683 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Constrain what reaches the vulnerable code: limit the size and shape of untrusted input, isolate the affected component in a sandboxed or least-privileged process, and enable the platform's memory-safety mitigations (ASLR, stack protector, hardened allocator) so an out-of-bounds access is more likely to fail closed than to be exploitable.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-j3px-q95c-9683 in your dependencies?
Find it across crates.io, including transitive dependencies.