Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹
🐹 Go
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

GHSA-hw28-333w-qxp3 harbor

MEDIUM

GHSA-hw28-333w-qxp3 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.5) Improper Privilege Management vulnerability in github.com/goharbor/harbor. A fix is available for github.com/goharbor/harbor — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Harbor fails to validate the user permissions when updating project configurations

Also known asBIT-harbor-2024-22278CVE-2024-22278GO-2024-3013
Published
Jul 31, 2024
Updated
Nov 18, 2024
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
2 / 2
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 20, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-hw28-333w-qxp3.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.4%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs31th percentile — riskier than 31% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-hw28-333w-qxp3 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 377,333 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

2 pkgs affected
🐹github.com/goharbor/harbor🐹github.com/goharbor/harbor

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

Harbor fails to validate the maintainer role permissions when creating/updating/deleting project configurations - API call:

  • PUT /projects/{project_name_or_id}/metadatas/{meta_name}
  • POST /projects/{project_name_or_id}/metadatas/{meta_name}
  • DELETE /projects/{project_name_or_id}/metadatas/{meta_name}

By sending a request to create/update/delete a metadata with an name that belongs to a project that the currently authenticated and granted to the maintainer role user doesn’t have access to, the attacker could modify configurations in the current project.

BTW: the maintainer role in Harbor was intended for individuals who closely support the project admin in maintaining the project but lack configuration management permissions. However, the maintainer role can utilize the metadata API to circumvent this limitation. It's important to note that any potential attacker must be authenticated and granted a specific project maintainer role to modify configurations, limiting their scope to only that project.

Patches

Will be fixed in v2.9.5, v2.10.3 and v2.11.0

Workarounds

There are no workarounds available.

Credit

Thanks to Ravid Mazon([email protected]), Jay Chen ([email protected]) Palo Alto Networks for reporting this issue.

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/goharbor/harborall versions2.9.5go get github.com/goharbor/harbor@v2.9.5
🐹Gogithub.com/goharbor/harbor2.10.0&&< 2.10.32.10.3go get github.com/goharbor/harbor@v2.10.3

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/goharbor/harbor, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update github.com/goharbor/harbor to 2.9.5 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-hw28-333w-qxp3 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-hw28-333w-qxp3 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-hw28-333w-qxp3. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact Harbor fails to validate the maintainer role permissions when creating/updating/deleting project configurations - API call: - PUT /projects/{project_name_or_id}/metadatas/{meta_name} - POST /projects/{project_name_or_id}/metadatas/{meta_name} - DELETE /projects/{project_name_or_id}/metadatas/{meta_name} By sending a request to create/update/delete a metadata with an name that belongs to a project that the currently authenticated and granted to the maintainer role user doesn’t have access to, the attacker could modify configurations in the current project. BTW: the maintainer role
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-hw28-333w-qxp3 in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-hw28-333w-qxp3 across Go dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-hw28-333w-qxp3: harbor (Medium 5.5) | O3 Security