Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
💧
💧 Hex
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

GHSA-hrfh-7j5f-8ccr RabbitMQ

HIGH

GHSA-hrfh-7j5f-8ccr is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in RabbitMQ. 1 public exploit reference exists, so weaponization risk is real. A fix is available for RabbitMQ — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Pivotal RabbitMQ is vulnerable to a denial of service attack

Also known asCVE-2019-11287
Published
May 24, 2022
Updated
Dec 10, 2025
Affected
4 pkgs
Patched
4 / 4
Exploits
1 known
Exploitation data as of Sep 18, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
4.4%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs91th percentile — riskier than 91% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-hrfh-7j5f-8ccr plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 377,166 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

4 pkgs affected
💧RabbitMQ💧RabbitMQ💧RabbitMQ💧RabbitMQ

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Hex packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Pivotal RabbitMQ, versions 3.7.x prior to 3.7.21 and 3.8.x prior to 3.8.1, and RabbitMQ for Pivotal Platform, 1.16.x versions prior to 1.16.7 and 1.17.x versions prior to 1.17.4, contain a web management plugin that is vulnerable to a denial of service attack. The "X-Reason" HTTP Header can be leveraged to insert a malicious Erlang format string that will expand and consume the heap, resulting in the server crashing.

Affected Packages

4 total 4 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
💧HexRabbitMQ3.7.0&&< 3.7.213.7.21mix deps.update RabbitMQ
💧HexRabbitMQ3.8.0&&< 3.8.13.8.1mix deps.update RabbitMQ
💧HexRabbitMQall versions1.16.7mix deps.update RabbitMQ
💧HexRabbitMQ1.17.0&&< 1.17.41.17.4mix deps.update RabbitMQ
Exploits & PoCs
1

Research use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for RabbitMQ, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update RabbitMQ to 3.7.21 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-hrfh-7j5f-8ccr is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-hrfh-7j5f-8ccr can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-hrfh-7j5f-8ccr. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Fixing This On Your OS

If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.

Red HatImportant

Red Hat Ansible Tower and Red Hat CloudForms are not vulnerable as they do not expose the RabbitMQ management interface by default. In Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13, the management interface was not enabled by default. So, although the flaw code was packaged, its impact for this version has been lowered to Moderate.

ProductFixed inAdvisory
Red Hat OpenStack Platform 15.0 (Stein)rabbitmq-server-0:3.7.22-1.el8ostRHSA-2020:0078

Frequently Asked Questions

Pivotal RabbitMQ, versions 3.7.x prior to 3.7.21 and 3.8.x prior to 3.8.1, and RabbitMQ for Pivotal Platform, 1.16.x versions prior to 1.16.7 and 1.17.x versions prior to 1.17.4, contain a web management plugin that is vulnerable to a denial of service attack. The "X-Reason" HTTP Header can be leveraged to insert a malicious Erlang format string that will expand and consume the heap, resulting in the server crashing.
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-hrfh-7j5f-8ccr in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-hrfh-7j5f-8ccr across Hex dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-hrfh-7j5f-8ccr: RabbitMQ (High 7.5) | O3 Security