GHSA-hq84-x37p-j6q5 is a medium-severity (CVSS 4.5) remote code execution vulnerability in winter/wn-backend-module. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-hq84-x37p-j6q5 is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.
Winter: Reflected XSS through the search query parameter in the backend Table widget
Real-World Exposure
winter/wn-backend-moduleReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Impact
Affected versions of Winter CMS render the search query parameter without HTML encoding inside a <script type="text/template"> block in the backend Table widget partial (modules/backend/widgets/table/partials/_table.php):
value="<?= get('search') ?>"
<script> is an HTML raw-text context, so the surrounding value="…" attribute quoting is not a parser boundary. A literal </script> in the query string terminates the template element early, and everything after it is parsed as ordinary markup in the backend document.
Any backend page rendering a Table or DataTable widget is a sink. The value is read from the global request through the get() helper, which — unlike post() — is not restricted by HTTP method, so a plain top-level GET navigation is sufficient. The template is also emitted unconditionally by the partial, so widgets using the default searching: false configuration are equally affected.
In Winter core the reachable route is the Editor Settings form (/backend/system/settings/update/winter/backend/editor), which renders six datatable fields and is gated by backend.manage_editor — assigned by default to the built-in Developer role. Third-party plugins using the datatable form widget, or the Table widget directly, expose the same sink on their own pages.
An attacker who induces a signed-in backend user to follow a crafted link executes script in that user's authenticated backend origin. The injected script can read the CSRF token published in the backend layout's <meta name="csrf-token"> element and issue credentialed requests as the victim, bounded only by that user's permissions. Because the core sink requires backend.manage_editor, the practical victim is a Developer-role user or superuser — who can edit CMS templates, so script running in that session can chain to server-side code execution.
This is not a permission bypass: the victim must already be authorised for the page, and the attacker gains no permission the victim does not hold.
To actively exploit this issue, an attacker needs no account of their own, but does need an authenticated backend user with access to a page rendering a Table or DataTable widget to follow an attacker-supplied link.
Patches
The search value is now HTML-encoded on output, matching every other value rendered by the same partial and the equivalent handling in the backend Search widget (modules/backend/widgets/search/partials/_search.php):
value="<?= e(get('search')); ?>"
This removes the raw-text terminator: the browser can no longer encounter an attacker-supplied literal </script> while tokenising the document. The template is subsequently parsed once by jQuery when the toolbar is built, so an encoded payload resolves to an inert attribute string rather than markup.
Regression coverage was added in modules/backend/tests/widgets/TableSearchEscapingTest.php, covering plain, mixed-case (</ScRiPt>) and whitespace-bearing (</script >) terminators, both searching states, and preservation of ordinary and Unicode search text.
This security issue has been fixed in v1.2.14.
Workarounds
If you cannot upgrade, apply https://github.com/wintercms/winter/commit/1b6397654124fb44a6abf6f3782b6a1d746cef14 manually — in modules/backend/widgets/table/partials/_table.php, change:
value="<?= get('search') ?>"
to:
value="<?= e(get('search')); ?>"
A restrictive Content Security Policy served at the web server or reverse proxy can reduce practical exploitability, but it is not a substitute for the fix: Winter's backend ships inline scripts, so a policy permissive enough to run the backend may still permit an injected execution primitive.
References
Credit to Awwader (@NRAwwad) for reporting the issue.
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:
- Email us at [email protected]
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐘Packagist | winter/wn-backend-module | ≥ 1.0.420&&< 1.2.14 | 1.2.14 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for winter/wn-backend-module. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update winter/wn-backend-module to 1.2.14 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-hq84-x37p-j6q5 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-hq84-x37p-j6q5 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-hq84-x37p-j6q5. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-hq84-x37p-j6q5 in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-hq84-x37p-j6q5 across Packagist dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.