Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹 Go
Not in CISA KEV

GHSA-hffm-g8v7-wrv7 v2

Fix: caddyserver/caddy@d42d39b

GHSA-hffm-g8v7-wrv7 is a CWE-755 vulnerability in github.com/caddyserver/caddy/v2. A fix is available for github.com/caddyserver/caddy/v2 — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Caddy: mTLS client authentication silently fails open when CA certificate file is missing or malformed

Also known asCVE-2026-27586GO-2026-4539
Published
Feb 24, 2026
Updated
Feb 27, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 19, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-hffm-g8v7-wrv7.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs19th percentile — riskier than 19% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐹github.com/caddyserver/caddy/v2

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

Two swallowed errors in ClientAuthentication.provision() cause mTLS client certificate authentication to silently fail open when a CA certificate file is missing, unreadable, or malformed. The server starts without error but accepts any client certificate signed by any system-trusted CA, completely bypassing the intended private CA trust boundary.

Details

In modules/caddytls/connpolicy.go, the provision() method has two return nil statements that should be return err:

Bug #1 — line 787:

ders, err := convertPEMFilesToDER(fpath)
if err != nil {
    return nil  // BUG: should be "return err"
}

Bug #2 — line 800:

err := caPool.Provision(ctx)
if err != nil {
    return nil  // BUG: should be "return err"
}

Compare with line 811 which correctly returns the error:

caRaw, err := ctx.LoadModule(clientauth, "CARaw")
if err != nil {
    return err  // CORRECT
}

When the error is swallowed on line 787, the chain is:

  1. TrustedCACerts remains empty (no DER data appended from the file)
  2. The len(clientauth.TrustedCACerts) > 0 guard on line 794 is false — skipped
  3. clientauth.CARaw is nil — line 806 returns nil
  4. clientauth.ca remains nil — no CA pool was created
  5. provision() returns nil — caller thinks provisioning succeeded

Then in ConfigureTLSConfig():

  1. Active() returns true because TrustedCACertPEMFiles is non-empty
  2. Default mode is set to RequireAndVerifyClientCert (line 860)
  3. But clientauth.ca is nil, so cfg.ClientCAs is never set (line 867 skipped)
  4. Go's crypto/tls with RequireAndVerifyClientCert + nil ClientCAs verifies client certs against the system root pool instead of the intended CA

The fix is changing return nil to return err on lines 787 and 800.

PoC

  1. Configure Caddy with mTLS pointing to a nonexistent CA file:
{
    "apps": {
        "http": {
            "servers": {
                "srv0": {
                    "listen": [":443"],
                    "tls_connection_policies": [{
                        "client_authentication": {
                            "trusted_ca_certs_pem_files": ["/nonexistent/ca.pem"]
                        }
                    }]
                }
            }
        }
    }
}
  1. Start Caddy — it starts without any error or warning.

  2. Connect with any client certificate (even self-signed):

openssl s_client -connect localhost:443 -cert client.pem -key client-key.pem
  1. The TLS handshake succeeds despite the certificate not being signed by the intended CA.

A full Go test that proves the bug end-to-end (including a successful TLS handshake with a random self-signed client cert) is here: https://gist.github.com/moscowchill/9566c79c76c0b64c57f8bd0716f97c48

Test output:

=== RUN   TestSwallowedErrorMTLSFailOpen
    BUG CONFIRMED: provision() swallowed the error from a nonexistent CA file.
    tls.Config has RequireAndVerifyClientCert but ClientCAs is nil.
    CRITICAL: TLS handshake succeeded with a self-signed client cert!
    The server accepted a client certificate NOT signed by the intended CA.
--- PASS: TestSwallowedErrorMTLSFailOpen (0.03s)

Impact

Any deployment using trusted_ca_cert_file or trusted_ca_certs_pem_files for mTLS will silently degrade to accepting any system-trusted client certificate if the CA file becomes unavailable. This can happen due to a typo in the path, file rotation, corruption, or permission changes. The server gives no indication that mTLS is misconfigured.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/caddyserver/caddy/v2all versions2.11.1go get github.com/caddyserver/caddy/v2@v2.11.1

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/caddyserver/caddy/v2, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update github.com/caddyserver/caddy/v2 to 2.11.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-hffm-g8v7-wrv7 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-hffm-g8v7-wrv7 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-hffm-g8v7-wrv7. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary Two swallowed errors in `ClientAuthentication.provision()` cause mTLS client certificate authentication to silently fail open when a CA certificate file is missing, unreadable, or malformed. The server starts without error but accepts any client certificate signed by any system-trusted CA, completely bypassing the intended private CA trust boundary. ### Details In `modules/caddytls/connpolicy.go`, the `provision()` method has two `return nil` statements that should be `return err`: **Bug #1 — line 787:** ```go ders, err := convertPEMFilesToDER(fpath) if err != nil { return
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-hffm-g8v7-wrv7 in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-hffm-g8v7-wrv7 across Go dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-hffm-g8v7-wrv7: v2 | O3 Security