Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🦀 crates.io

GHSA-h4hq-rgvh-wh27

HIGH

Vaultwarden's Collection Management Operations Allowed Without `manage` Verification for Manager Role

Also known asCVE-2026-27803
Published
Mar 4, 2026
Updated
Mar 4, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk20th percentile+0.23%
0.00%0.26%0.52%0.79%0.0%0.1%0.1%0.3%Apr 26Jun 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected
🦀vaultwarden

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects crates.io packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

Testing confirmed that even when a Manager has manage=false for a given collection, they can still perform the following management operations as long as they have access to the collection:

  • PUT /api/organizations/<org_id>/collections/<col_id> succeeds (HTTP 200)
  • PUT /api/organizations/<org_id>/collections/<col_id>/users succeeds (HTTP 200)
  • DELETE /api/organizations/<org_id>/collections/<col_id> succeeds (HTTP 200)

Description

  • The Manager guard checks only whether the user can access the collection, not whether they have manage privileges. This check is directly applied to management endpoints. src/auth.rs:816

    
    if !Collection::can_access_collection(&headers.membership, &col_id, &conn).await {
        err_handler!("The current user isn't a manager for this collection")
    }
    
  • The can_access_collection function does not evaluate the manage flag. src/db/models/collection.rs:140

    
    pub async fn can_access_collection(member: &Membership, col_id: &CollectionId, conn: &DbConn) -> bool {
        member.has_status(MembershipStatus::Confirmed)
            && (member.has_full_access()
                || CollectionUser::has_access_to_collection_by_user(col_id, &member.user_uuid, conn).await
                || ...
    
  • A separate management-permission check exists and includes manage validation, but it is not used during authorization for the affected endpoints. src/db/models/collection.rs:516

    
    pub async fn is_manageable_by_user(&self, user_uuid: &UserId, conn: &DbConn) -> bool {
        let Some(member) = Membership::find_confirmed_by_user_and_org(user_uuid, &self.org_uuid, conn).await else {
            return false;
        };
        if member.has_full_access() {
            return true;
        }
        ...
    
  • The actual update and deletion endpoints only accept ManagerHeaders and do not perform additional manage checks. src/api/core/organizations.rs:608

  async fn put_organization_collection_update(..., headers: ManagerHeaders, ...)

src/api/core/organizations.rs:890

  async fn put_collection_users(..., headers: ManagerHeaders, ...)

src/api/core/organizations.rs:747

  async fn delete_organization_collection(..., headers: ManagerHeaders, ...)

Preconditions

  • The attacker is a Manager within the target organization.
  • The attacker has access to the target collection (assigned=true).
  • The attacker’s permission for that collection is manage=false.
  • A valid API access token has been obtained.

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Confirm that the attacker’s current permissions for the target collection include manage=false.

    <img width="2015" height="636" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/58ddc733-e37c-4766-a980-b1ea1918ceb4" />
  2. As a control test, verify that update operations fail for collections the attacker cannot access.

    <img width="2021" height="852" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d8699442-2dfc-4d73-8940-ec10f4a175f0" />
  3. Confirm that update operations succeed for the target collection where manage=false.

    <img width="2013" height="690" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/33d9845d-d18e-456c-a58c-e780911347a9" />
  4. Use PUT /collections/{col_id}/users to set manage=true, confirming that the attacker can escalate their own privileges.

    <img width="2018" height="488" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/da8c5246-cf2a-46c2-9a25-e99d907f852d" />
  5. Verify that deletion of the collection succeeds despite the Manager lacking management rights.

    <img width="2018" height="487" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a97c8fb2-4f97-4c2a-a90b-9d95dbde84fd" />

Required Minimum Privileges

  • Organization Manager role (Owner/Admin privileges are not required)
  • Works even with access_all=false
  • Only access rights to the target collection are required (manage privilege is not required)

Attack Scenario

A restricted Manager (intended for read/use-only access) directly invokes the API to update collection settings, elevate their own privileges to manage=true, and even delete the collection.

This allows the user to bypass operational access restrictions and effectively gain administrator-equivalent control over the collection.

Potential Impact

  • Confidentiality: Expansion of access scope through unauthorized privilege escalation and configuration changes.
  • Integrity: Unauthorized modification of collection settings and assignments; potential disabling of access controls.
  • Availability: Deletion of collections may disrupt business operations.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🦀crates.iovaultwardenall versions1.35.4

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for vaultwarden. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update vaultwarden to 1.35.4 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-h4hq-rgvh-wh27 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-h4hq-rgvh-wh27 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-h4hq-rgvh-wh27. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary Testing confirmed that even when a Manager has `manage=false` for a given collection, they can still perform the following management operations as long as they have access to the collection: * `PUT /api/organizations/<org_id>/collections/<col_id>` succeeds (HTTP 200) * `PUT /api/organizations/<org_id>/collections/<col_id>/users` succeeds (HTTP 200) * `DELETE /api/organizations/<org_id>/collections/<col_id>` succeeds (HTTP 200) ## Description * The Manager guard checks only whether the user **can access the collection**, not whether they have `manage` privileges. This check is
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-h4hq-rgvh-wh27 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-h4hq-rgvh-wh27 across crates.io dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.