GHSA-h3hw-29fv-2x75 — @envelop/graphql-modules
Fix: graphql-hive/envelop@ab49fa2GHSA-h3hw-29fv-2x75 is a security vulnerability in @envelop/graphql-modules. A fix is available for @envelop/graphql-modules — see the affected versions and patch details below.
@envelop/graphql-modules has a Race Condition vulnerability
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
@envelop/graphql-modulesnpmDescription
Summary
Context race condition when using useGraphQLModules plugin
Details
Related to: https://github.com/graphql-hive/graphql-modules/security/advisories/GHSA-53wg-r69p-v3r7
When 2 or more parallel requests are made which trigger the same service, the context of the requests is mixed up in the service when the context is injected via @ExecutionContext() and graphql-modules are used in Yoga with useGraphQLModules(application). This issue was fixed in graphql-modules in 2.4.1 and 3.1.1 but using useGraphQLModules will bypass the async_hooks fix that was implemented.
PoC
Create the following package.json and run npm i
{
"name": "poc",
"scripts": {
"compile": "tsc",
"start": "npm run compile && node ./dist/src/index.js",
"test": "npm run compile && node ./dist/test/bleedtest.js"
},
"dependencies": {
"@envelop/graphql-modules": "^9.0.0",
"graphql-yoga": "^5.0.0",
"graphql": "^16.10.0",
"graphql-modules": "3.1.1",
"reflect-metadata": "0.2.1",
"axios": "^1.8.4"
},
"devDependencies": {
"@types/node": "^22.14.1",
"typescript": "^5.8.3"
}
}
Define the app entrypoint: src/index.ts
import { module } from "./module.js";
import { useGraphQLModules } from '@envelop/graphql-modules'
import { createApplication } from "graphql-modules";
import { createServer } from 'node:http'
import { randomUUID } from "node:crypto";
import { createYoga } from 'graphql-yoga';
const application = createApplication({
modules: [module]
})
const yoga = createYoga({
schema: application.schema,
plugins: [useGraphQLModules(application)],
context() {
return {
requestId: randomUUID(),
}
}
})
const server = createServer(yoga)
server.listen(4001, '127.0.0.1', undefined, () => {
console.info(
`[Server] Running on http://localhost:4001/graphql`
)
})
Create the test module: src/module.ts
import { createModule, gql } from "graphql-modules";
import Service from "./service.js";
const typeDefs = gql`
type Book {
id1: String
id2: String
}
type Query {
books: [Book]
}
`;
export const module = createModule({
id: 'book-module',
typeDefs: [typeDefs],
providers: [Service],
resolvers: {
Query: {
// return one empty book
books: () => [{}],
},
Book: {
// return the requestId from the context
id1: async (_root, _args, { injector } ) => {
return injector.get(Service).get();
},
// return the requestId from the context of the service 100 ms later
id2: async (_root, _args, { injector } ) => {
await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 100));
return injector.get(Service).get()
},
}
}
})
Add the Service that's to be injected src/service.ts
import { ExecutionContext, Injectable } from 'graphql-modules';
import 'reflect-metadata';
@Injectable()
export default class Service {
@ExecutionContext()
private context: ExecutionContext;
get() {
return this.context.requestId;
}
}
Add the test case test/bleedtest.js
import axios from 'axios';
const url = 'http://localhost:4001/graphql';
const query = `query { books { id1 id2 } }`;
const makeGraphQLRequest = async () => {
const response = await axios.post(url, { query });
const book = response.data.data.books[0]
if (book.id1 !== book.id2) {
throw new Error(`wrong response with ids ${(book.id1)} and ${(book.id2)}`)
}
}
const numberOfRequests = 2;
await Promise.all(Array.from(
{ length: numberOfRequests },
makeGraphQLRequest,
));
Then run the server with npm run start in one terminal and the testcase in another with npm run test.
The returned IDs should be identical as they are both read from the context within the same request.
However, there is a mismatch:
❯ npm run test
> [email protected] test
> npm run compile && node ./dist/test/bleedtest.js
> [email protected] compile
> tsc
file://<redacted>/dist/test/bleedtest.js:8
throw new Error(`wrong response with ids ${(book.id1)} and ${(book.id2)}`);
^
Error: wrong response with ids c2d83151-0922-4f25-a3e9-2f03acc1376a and e16c7335-0eaa-4386-b415-869ee4b05315
at makeGraphQLRequest (file://<redacted>/dist/test/bleedtest.js:8:15)
at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:95:5)
at async Promise.all (index 0)
at async file://<redacted>/dist/test/bleedtest.js:12:1
Impact
Any application that uses useGraphQLModules from @envelop/graphql-modules along with services that inject the context using @ExecutionContext() from a singleton provider are at risk. The more traffic an application has, the higher the chance for parallel requests, the higher the risk.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | @envelop/graphql-modules | all versions | 9.1.0npm install @envelop/graphql-modules@9.1.0 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for @envelop/graphql-modules, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update @envelop/graphql-modules to 9.1.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-h3hw-29fv-2x75 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-h3hw-29fv-2x75 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to GHSA-h3hw-29fv-2x75. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-h3hw-29fv-2x75 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds GHSA-h3hw-29fv-2x75 across npm dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.