Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹 Go

GHSA-grjv-gjgr-66g2

LOW

SpiceDB exclusions can result in no permission returned when permission expected

Also known asCVE-2024-38361GO-2024-2939
Published
Jun 20, 2024
Updated
Feb 4, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.4%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk31th percentile+0.21%
0.00%0.30%0.60%0.90%0.2%0.4%Dec 25Apr 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected
🐹github.com/authzed/spicedb

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Background

Use of an exclusion under an arrow that has multiple resources may resolve to NO_PERMISSION when permission is expected.

For example, given this schema:

definition user {}

definition folder {
  relation member: user
  relation banned: user
  permission view = member - banned
}

definition resource {
  relation folder: folder
  permission view = folder->view
}

If the resource exists under multiple folders and the user has access to view more than a single folder, SpiceDB may report the user does not have access due to a failure in the exclusion dispatcher to request that all the folders in which the user is a member be returned

Impact

Permission is returned as NO_PERMISSION when PERMISSION is expected on the CheckPermission API.

Workarounds

None

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/authzed/spicedball versions1.33.1

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/authzed/spicedb. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update github.com/authzed/spicedb to 1.33.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-grjv-gjgr-66g2 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-grjv-gjgr-66g2 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-grjv-gjgr-66g2. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Background Use of an exclusion under an arrow that has multiple resources may resolve to `NO_PERMISSION` when permission is expected. For example, given this schema: ```zed definition user {} definition folder { relation member: user relation banned: user permission view = member - banned } definition resource { relation folder: folder permission view = folder->view } ``` If the resource exists under *multiple* folders and the user has access to view more than a single folder, SpiceDB may report the user does not have access due to a failure in the exclusion dispatcher to r
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-grjv-gjgr-66g2 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-grjv-gjgr-66g2 across Go dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.