How severe is GHSA-gmh7-3g9r-mjh5?

No CVSS score has been assigned to GHSA-gmh7-3g9r-mjh5 yet. Review the advisory details and affected package list to assess your exposure.

Which packages are affected by GHSA-gmh7-3g9r-mjh5?

GHSA-gmh7-3g9r-mjh5 affects the following packages: pypdf (PyPI). Ecosystems affected: PyPI.

How do I fix GHSA-gmh7-3g9r-mjh5?

Update pypdf to 6.21.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-gmh7-3g9r-mjh5 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

How do I detect GHSA-gmh7-3g9r-mjh5 in my PyPI dependencies?

Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for pypdf, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

How do I mitigate GHSA-gmh7-3g9r-mjh5 if there is no patch (or I can't update yet)?

If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

Is GHSA-gmh7-3g9r-mjh5 actively exploited in the wild?

No public exploit code has been indexed for GHSA-gmh7-3g9r-mjh5 yet. This does not mean the vulnerability cannot be exploited — absence of public exploits does not imply safety. Apply the recommended fix and use O3 Security to monitor your exposure.

What is the EPSS score for GHSA-gmh7-3g9r-mjh5?

GHSA-gmh7-3g9r-mjh5 has an EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) score of 0.5%, placing it in the 44th percentile of all CVEs. EPSS is maintained by FIRST.org and estimates the probability that a vulnerability will be exploited in the wild within the next 30 days. This score indicates relatively lower exploitation probability, though the CVSS severity should still guide your patching priority.

What type of vulnerability is GHSA-gmh7-3g9r-mjh5?

GHSA-gmh7-3g9r-mjh5 is classified as CWE-834 (CWE-834). This weakness type describe the underlying flaw category, which helps determine the potential impact and the right class of mitigation.

When was GHSA-gmh7-3g9r-mjh5 published, and has it been updated?

GHSA-gmh7-3g9r-mjh5 was published on October 23, 2026 and was last updated on October 23, 2026. Advisory data evolves as severity scores, affected ranges, and exploit intelligence are revised — always check the latest version of the advisory before acting.

🐍 PyPI

Not in CISA KEV

pypdf: Possible long runtimes for large xref table header limitsGHSA-gmh7-3g9r-mjh5

Fix: py-pdf/pypdf#4239

GHSA-gmh7-3g9r-mjh5 is a CWE-834 vulnerability in pypdf. A fix is available for pypdf — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Also known asCVE-2026-115580

Published

Oct 23, 2026

Updated

Oct 23, 2026

Affected

1 pkg

Patched

1 / 1

Exploits

None indexed

Exploitation data as of Oct 24, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗

0.5%probability of exploitation in next 30 days

Lower Risk0.00%

Lower risk than most CVEs44th percentile — riskier than 44% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected

🐍pypdf

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

An attacker who uses this vulnerability can craft a PDF which leads to long runtimes. This requires opening a file with large/wrong upper limits in the xref table.

Patches

This has been fixed in pypdf==6.21.2.

Workarounds

If you cannot upgrade yet, consider applying the changes from PR #4239.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed

Ecosystem	Package	Vulnerable range	Fix
🐍PyPI	`pypdf`	all versions	6.21.2`pip install --upgrade 'pypdf==6.21.2'`

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency

Detect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for pypdf, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update pypdf to 6.21.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-gmh7-3g9r-mjh5 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact An attacker who uses this vulnerability can craft a PDF which leads to long runtimes. This requires opening a file with large/wrong upper limits in the xref table. ### Patches This has been fixed in [pypdf==6.21.2](https://github.com/py-pdf/pypdf/releases/tag/6.21.2). ### Workarounds If you cannot upgrade yet, consider applying the changes from PR [#4239](https://github.com/py-pdf/pypdf/pull/4239).

O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-gmh7-3g9r-mjh5 in your dependencies?

Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.

Scan my dependencies How O3 SCA works