Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
LOW severity

GHSA-gmfw-g93r-vg53

LOWFix: open-webui/open-webui#25946

GHSA-gmfw-g93r-vg53 is a low-severity (CVSS 3.1) Missing Authentication vulnerability in open-webui. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-gmfw-g93r-vg53 is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

Open WebUI: Unauthenticated WebSocket Access to Collaborative Document Handlers (ydoc:awareness:update, ydoc:document:leave)

Also known asCVE-2026-59715PYSEC-2026-3599
Published
Jul 24, 2026
Updated
Aug 4, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Aug 24, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-gmfw-g93r-vg53.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs13th percentile — riskier than 13% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-gmfw-g93r-vg53 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 370,894 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍open-webui

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

The Socket.IO server is configured with always_connect=True (lines 78, 91 in backend/open_webui/socket/main.py) and the connect handler (line 329) never rejects unauthenticated connections. Two Ydoc event handlers have zero authentication checks, allowing unauthenticated clients to interact with collaborative document sessions.

Vulnerable Code

ydoc:awareness:update (line 741) — No auth check at all

@sio.on('ydoc:awareness:update')
async def yjs_awareness_update(sid, data):
    document_id = data['document_id']
    user_id = data.get('user_id', sid)
    update = data['update']
    # No SESSION_POOL check, no room membership check
    await sio.emit(
        'ydoc:awareness:update',
        {'document_id': document_id, 'user_id': user_id, 'update': update},
        room=f'doc_{document_id}',
        skip_sid=sid,
    )

ydoc:document:leave (line 711) — No auth check at all

@sio.on('ydoc:document:leave')
async def yjs_document_leave(sid, data):
    document_id = data['document_id']
    user_id = data.get('user_id', sid)
    # No auth check
    await YDOC_MANAGER.remove_user(document_id=document_id, user_id=sid)
    await sio.emit('ydoc:user:left',
        {'document_id': document_id, 'user_id': user_id},
        room=f'doc_{document_id}')

Root Cause: always_connect=True (line 78)

sio = socketio.AsyncServer(
    always_connect=True,   # Never rejects connections
    ...
)

The connect handler (line 329) adds authenticated users to SESSION_POOL but never returns False or raises an exception for unauthenticated connections.

Exploitation

  1. An unauthenticated attacker connects via Socket.IO (no token needed)
  2. The attacker emits ydoc:awareness:update with:
    • document_id: a known/guessed note UUID (format: note:{uuid})
    • user_id: spoofed to impersonate any user
    • update: arbitrary awareness data (fake cursor positions, selections)
  3. The fake awareness data is broadcast to all legitimate users in the document room
  4. The attacker can also emit ydoc:document:leave with spoofed user_id to broadcast fake ydoc:user:left events

Impact

  • UI disruption: Fake cursor positions and user presence in collaborative editing sessions
  • User impersonation: Attacker can spoof any user_id in awareness updates
  • Resource exhaustion: Unlimited unauthenticated WebSocket connections maintained by the server

Note: Other Ydoc handlers (ydoc:document:join, ydoc:document:update, ydoc:document:state) correctly check SESSION_POOL membership.

Suggested Fix

  1. Set always_connect=False or reject unauthenticated connections in the connect handler
  2. Add SESSION_POOL checks to ydoc:awareness:update and ydoc:document:leave
  3. Add room membership verification before broadcasting to document rooms

AI Disclosure (per Rule 11): AI (Claude) was used to assist with source code review, identifying potential vulnerability patterns, and drafting this report. The researcher directed the analysis, selected focus areas, and independently verified all findings against a running v0.8.12 Docker instance using real HTTP requests with two test accounts. The PoCs included are reproducible and were confirmed live before submission.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIopen-webui0.6.16&&< 0.10.00.10.0

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for open-webui. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update open-webui to 0.10.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-gmfw-g93r-vg53 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-gmfw-g93r-vg53 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-gmfw-g93r-vg53. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary The Socket.IO server is configured with `always_connect=True` (lines 78, 91 in `backend/open_webui/socket/main.py`) and the `connect` handler (line 329) never rejects unauthenticated connections. Two Ydoc event handlers have zero authentication checks, allowing unauthenticated clients to interact with collaborative document sessions. ## Vulnerable Code ### `ydoc:awareness:update` (line 741) — No auth check at all ```python @sio.on('ydoc:awareness:update') async def yjs_awareness_update(sid, data): document_id = data['document_id'] user_id = data.get('user_id', sid) up
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-gmfw-g93r-vg53 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-gmfw-g93r-vg53 across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.

GHSA-gmfw-g93r-vg53: open-webui Denial of… | O3 Security