GHSA-gfrh-gwqc-63cv — sulu/sulu
Fix: sulu/sulu@570c781GHSA-gfrh-gwqc-63cv is a security vulnerability in sulu/sulu. A fix is available for sulu/sulu — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Sulu HTML Injection via Autocomplete Suggestion
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-gfrh-gwqc-63cv.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
Real-World Exposure
sulu/sulu🐘sulu/suluReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Impact
It is an issue when input HTML into the Tag name. The HTML is execute when the tag name is listed in the auto complete form. Only admin users are affected and only admin users can create tags.
Patches
Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?
The problem is patched with Version 2.4.16 and 2.5.12.
Workarounds
Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?
Create a custom mutation observer
References
Are there any links users can visit to find out more?
Currently not.
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:
- Open an issue in sulu/sulu repository
- Email us at [email protected]
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐘Packagist | sulu/sulu | ≥ 2.0.0&&< 2.4.16 | 2.4.16composer require sulu/sulu:^2.4.16 |
| 🐘Packagist | sulu/sulu | ≥ 2.5.0&&< 2.5.12 | 2.5.12composer require sulu/sulu:^2.5.12 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for sulu/sulu, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update sulu/sulu to 2.4.16 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-gfrh-gwqc-63cv is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-gfrh-gwqc-63cv can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to GHSA-gfrh-gwqc-63cv. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-gfrh-gwqc-63cv in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds GHSA-gfrh-gwqc-63cv across Packagist dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.