How severe is GHSA-gfrh-gwqc-63cv?

No CVSS score has been assigned to GHSA-gfrh-gwqc-63cv yet. Review the advisory details and affected package list to assess your exposure.

Which packages are affected by GHSA-gfrh-gwqc-63cv?

GHSA-gfrh-gwqc-63cv affects the following packages: sulu/sulu (Packagist), sulu/sulu (Packagist). Ecosystems affected: Packagist.

How do I fix GHSA-gfrh-gwqc-63cv?

Update sulu/sulu to 2.4.16 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-gfrh-gwqc-63cv is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

How do I detect GHSA-gfrh-gwqc-63cv in my Packagist dependencies?

Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for sulu/sulu, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

How do I mitigate GHSA-gfrh-gwqc-63cv if there is no patch (or I can't update yet)?

Escape or sanitise the affected output on the server side rather than relying on client-side filtering, and add a Content-Security-Policy that blocks inline script execution so injected markup cannot run even if it reaches the page.

Is GHSA-gfrh-gwqc-63cv actively exploited in the wild?

No public exploit code has been indexed for GHSA-gfrh-gwqc-63cv yet. This does not mean the vulnerability cannot be exploited — absence of public exploits does not imply safety. Apply the recommended fix and use O3 Security to monitor your exposure.

What is the EPSS score for GHSA-gfrh-gwqc-63cv?

GHSA-gfrh-gwqc-63cv has an EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) score of 0.5%, placing it in the 44th percentile of all CVEs. EPSS is maintained by FIRST.org and estimates the probability that a vulnerability will be exploited in the wild within the next 30 days. This score indicates relatively lower exploitation probability, though the CVSS severity should still guide your patching priority.

What type of vulnerability is GHSA-gfrh-gwqc-63cv?

GHSA-gfrh-gwqc-63cv is classified as CWE-80 (CWE-80), Cross-site Scripting (XSS) (CWE-79). These weakness types describe the underlying flaw category, which helps determine the potential impact and the right class of mitigation. This is a high-impact weakness class that often enables remote code execution or data exposure.

When was GHSA-gfrh-gwqc-63cv published, and has it been updated?

GHSA-gfrh-gwqc-63cv was published on February 5, 2024 and was last updated on September 10, 2026. Advisory data evolves as severity scores, affected ranges, and exploit intelligence are revised — always check the latest version of the advisory before acting.

🐘 Packagist

Not in CISA KEV

Sulu HTML Injection via Autocomplete SuggestionGHSA-gfrh-gwqc-63cv

Fix: sulu/sulu@570c781

GHSA-gfrh-gwqc-63cv is a CWE-80 vulnerability in sulu/sulu. A fix is available for sulu/sulu — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Also known asCVE-2024-24807

Published

Feb 5, 2024

Updated

Sep 10, 2026

Affected

2 pkgs

Patched

2 / 2

Exploits

None indexed

Exploitation data as of Nov 9, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-gfrh-gwqc-63cv.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗

0.5%probability of exploitation in next 30 days

Lower Risk0.00%

Lower risk than most CVEs44th percentile — riskier than 44% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

Real-World Exposure

2 pkgs affected

🐘sulu/sulu🐘sulu/sulu

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

It is an issue when input HTML into the Tag name. The HTML is execute when the tag name is listed in the auto complete form. Only admin users are affected and only admin users can create tags.

Patches

Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?

The problem is patched with Version 2.4.16 and 2.5.12.

Workarounds

Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?

Create a custom mutation observer

References

Are there any links users can visit to find out more?

Currently not.

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:

Open an issue in sulu/sulu repository
Email us at [email protected]

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed

Ecosystem	Package	Vulnerable range	Fix
🐘Packagist	`sulu/sulu`	≥ 2.0.0&&< 2.4.16	2.4.16`composer require sulu/sulu:^2.4.16`
🐘Packagist	`sulu/sulu`	≥ 2.5.0&&< 2.5.12	2.5.12`composer require sulu/sulu:^2.5.12`

Affected Products

1 product · 2 configurations

Application

sulusulu

≥ 2.5.0 && < 2.5.12

range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency

Detect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for sulu/sulu, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update sulu/sulu to 2.4.16 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-gfrh-gwqc-63cv is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Escape or sanitise the affected output on the server side rather than relying on client-side filtering, and add a Content-Security-Policy that blocks inline script execution so injected markup cannot run even if it reaches the page.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact It is an issue when input HTML into the Tag name. The HTML is execute when the tag name is listed in the auto complete form. Only admin users are affected and only admin users can create tags. ### Patches _Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?_ The problem is patched with Version 2.4.16 and 2.5.12. ### Workarounds _Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?_ Create a custom mutation observer ### References _Are there any links users can visit to find out more?_ Currently not. ### For more information _If

O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-gfrh-gwqc-63cv in your dependencies?

Find it across Packagist, including transitive dependencies.

Scan my dependencies How O3 SCA works