How severe is GHSA-gcqf-5x9f-hq7f?

GHSA-gcqf-5x9f-hq7f has a CVSS score of 6.5/10, rated MEDIUM. Review your exposure and patch according to your risk tolerance.

Which packages are affected by GHSA-gcqf-5x9f-hq7f?

GHSA-gcqf-5x9f-hq7f affects the following packages: statamic/cms (Packagist), statamic/cms (Packagist). Ecosystems affected: Packagist.

How do I fix GHSA-gcqf-5x9f-hq7f?

Update statamic/cms to 5.73.16 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-gcqf-5x9f-hq7f is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

How do I detect GHSA-gcqf-5x9f-hq7f in my Packagist dependencies?

Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for statamic/cms. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

How do I mitigate GHSA-gcqf-5x9f-hq7f if there is no patch (or I can't update yet)?

If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

How does O3 Security protect against GHSA-gcqf-5x9f-hq7f?

O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-gcqf-5x9f-hq7f is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Is GHSA-gcqf-5x9f-hq7f actively exploited in the wild?

No public exploit code has been indexed for GHSA-gcqf-5x9f-hq7f yet. This does not mean the vulnerability cannot be exploited — absence of public exploits does not imply safety. Apply the recommended fix and use O3 Security to monitor your exposure.

What is the EPSS score for GHSA-gcqf-5x9f-hq7f?

GHSA-gcqf-5x9f-hq7f has an EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) score of 0.2%, placing it in the 13th percentile of all CVEs. EPSS is maintained by FIRST.org and estimates the probability that a vulnerability will be exploited in the wild within the next 30 days. This score indicates relatively lower exploitation probability, though the CVSS severity should still guide your patching priority.

What type of vulnerability is GHSA-gcqf-5x9f-hq7f?

GHSA-gcqf-5x9f-hq7f is classified as Information Exposure (CWE-200). This weakness type describe the underlying flaw category, which helps determine the potential impact and the right class of mitigation.

When was GHSA-gcqf-5x9f-hq7f published, and has it been updated?

GHSA-gcqf-5x9f-hq7f was published on March 26, 2026 and was last updated on March 27, 2026. Advisory data evolves as severity scores, affected ranges, and exploit intelligence are revised — always check the latest version of the advisory before acting.

🐘 Packagist

GHSA-gcqf-5x9f-hq7f

MEDIUM

Statamic's sensitive configuration values are exposed to content editors via Antlers-enabled fields

Also known asCVE-2026-33886

Published

Mar 26, 2026

Updated

Mar 27, 2026

Affected

2 pkgs

Patched

2 / 2

Exploits

None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗

0.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days

Lower Risk13th percentile+0.16%

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

2 pkgs affected

🐘statamic/cms🐘statamic/cms

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

A control panel user with access to Antlers-enabled fields could access sensitive application configuration values by inserting config variables into their content.

Patches

This has been fixed in 5.73.16 and 6.7.2.

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed

Ecosystem	Package	Vulnerable range	Fix
🐘Packagist	`statamic/cms`	≥ 5.73.12&&< 5.73.16	5.73.16
🐘Packagist	`statamic/cms`	≥ 6.5.0&&< 6.7.2	6.7.2

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency

Detect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for statamic/cms. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update statamic/cms to 5.73.16 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-gcqf-5x9f-hq7f is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-gcqf-5x9f-hq7f is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-gcqf-5x9f-hq7f. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact A control panel user with access to Antlers-enabled fields could access sensitive application configuration values by inserting config variables into their content. ### Patches This has been fixed in 5.73.16 and 6.7.2.

O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-gcqf-5x9f-hq7f in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-gcqf-5x9f-hq7f across Packagist dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.

Scan my dependencies How O3 SCA works